Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Bahardar vs Awassa Kenema: match statistics

Bahardar crest
Bahardar
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Awassa Kenema crest
Awassa Kenema
130%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
240%(0.00)

Awassa Kenema presents significantly better form and efficiency than Bahardar. The guests occupy 2nd place in the table with a 50% win rate away, while the hosts are only in 9th position with merely 38% wins at home. Awassa Kenema has a clear advantage in chance conversion (17% vs 9%) and average goals scored away (1.13 vs 0.88 for Bahardar at home). Bahardar hasn't lost in the last 5 matches overall, but drew as many as 4 times, which evidences difficulties in scoring goals (only 2 goals in the last 5 meetings). The guests have better points form (1.6 PPG vs 1.4 PPG) and a positive goal difference away (+4). Considering Bahardar's defensive solidity (75% clean sheets at home) and tendency to draw, I expect a tight match with a slight advantage for the guests.

Bahardar vs Awassa Kenema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Bahardar played Awassa Kenema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 25 January 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Bahardar: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Awassa Kenema: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Bahardar scores 0.69 and concedes 0.63 goals per match. Awassa Kenema scores 1.13 and concedes 0.69. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Bahardar 31%, Awassa Kenema 44%. Over 2.5: Bahardar 25%, Awassa Kenema 25%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 29%.

xG, shots and style

Bahardar has higher xG: 1.17 vs 1.04. Bahardar: 8.3 shots per match, Awassa Kenema: 6.1.

Match halves

Bahardar: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.50. Awassa Kenema: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

Bahardar: 76-90+ (4 goals). Awassa Kenema: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 29%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Awassa Kenema presents significantly better form and efficiency than Bahardar. The guests occupy 2nd place in the table with a 50% win rate away, while the hosts are only in 9th position with merely 38% wins at home. Awassa Kenema has a clear advantage in chance conversion (17% vs 9%) and average goals scored away (1.13 vs 0.88 for Bahardar at home). Bahardar hasn't lost in the last 5 matches overall, but drew as many as 4 times, which evidences difficulties in scoring goals (only 2 goals in the last 5 meetings). The guests have better points form (1.6 PPG vs 1.4 PPG) and a positive goal difference away (+4). Considering Bahardar's defensive solidity (75% clean sheets at home) and tendency to draw, I expect a tight match with a slight advantage for the guests.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
BahardarAwassa Kenema
4Shots5
BahardarAwassa Kenema
1Shots on target2
BahardarAwassa Kenema
0.86xG1.02
BahardarAwassa Kenema
2Corners4
BahardarAwassa Kenema
72Dangerous attacks77
BahardarAwassa Kenema
15Fouls17
BahardarAwassa Kenema
0Cards0
BahardarAwassa Kenema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

BahardarAwassa Kenema
0.69Goals scored / match1.13
BahardarAwassa Kenema
0.63Goals conceded / match0.69
BahardarAwassa Kenema
51%Average possession48%
BahardarAwassa Kenema
2.5Shots on target / match2.63
BahardarAwassa Kenema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.25Shots per match6.13
BahardarAwassa Kenema
2.5Shots on target2.63
BahardarAwassa Kenema
8.3%Shot conversion18.4%
BahardarAwassa Kenema
51%Possession48%
BahardarAwassa Kenema
1.17xG for1.04
BahardarAwassa Kenema
1.18xG against1.27
BahardarAwassa Kenema

Shooting quality

Bahardar: BalancedAwassa Kenema: Efficient finishing
BahardarAwassa Kenema
Accuracy (shots on target)30%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Awassa Kenema is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Bahardar · 1.6 pts / match - Awassa Kenema

Bahardar
DDWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
25% W56% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-9-3
1.31 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-1
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
WWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 0.93Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Awassa Kenema
LDWDW
Season result split
50% W25% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-4
1.75 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WLWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 0.82Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Awassa Kenema is 64% better for: goals scored per match.

0.69 goals / match - Bahardar · 1.13 goals / match - Awassa Kenema

Bahardar is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.63 goals / match - Bahardar · 0.69 goals / match - Awassa Kenema

Bahardar scoring profile: mixed

Bahardar scores in 44% of matches (7 of 16 matches), while Awassa Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).

Awassa Kenema scoring profile: mixed

Awassa Kenema scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Bahardar keeps a clean sheet in 63% (10 of 16 matches).

11Goals scored (season)18
BahardarAwassa Kenema
10Goals conceded (season)11
BahardarAwassa Kenema
1.31Average goals in match1.81
BahardarAwassa Kenema
2Goals scored (last 5)4
BahardarAwassa Kenema
1Goals conceded (last 5)2
BahardarAwassa Kenema

How often they score at least...

44%1 goal69%
BahardarAwassa Kenema
19%2 goals38%
BahardarAwassa Kenema
6%3 goals6%
BahardarAwassa Kenema
0%4 goals0%
BahardarAwassa Kenema

How often they concede at least...

38%1 goal69%
BahardarAwassa Kenema
13%2 goals0%
BahardarAwassa Kenema
13%3 goals0%
BahardarAwassa Kenema
0%4 goals0%
BahardarAwassa Kenema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time25%
BahardarAwassa Kenema
0%BTTS in both halves0%
BahardarAwassa Kenema
6%Scored in both halves25%
BahardarAwassa Kenema

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
BahardarAwassa Kenema
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
BahardarAwassa Kenema
20%BTTS - last 520%
BahardarAwassa Kenema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

19%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
BahardarAwassa Kenema
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
BahardarAwassa Kenema
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
BahardarAwassa Kenema

2nd half

44%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
BahardarAwassa Kenema
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time13%
BahardarAwassa Kenema
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
BahardarAwassa Kenema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Bahardar - half-time state
6% leading88% draw6% trailing
Awassa Kenema - half-time state
19% leading50% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.06Points per match (1st half)1.06
BahardarAwassa Kenema
0.19Goals scored (1st half)0.44
BahardarAwassa Kenema
0.25Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
BahardarAwassa Kenema
0.44Average goals (1st half)1
BahardarAwassa Kenema
88%Clean sheet before half-time44%
BahardarAwassa Kenema
81%No goal before half-time63%
BahardarAwassa Kenema

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)2
BahardarAwassa Kenema
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
BahardarAwassa Kenema
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.13
BahardarAwassa Kenema
0.88Average goals (2nd half)0.81
BahardarAwassa Kenema
69%Clean sheet after half-time88%
BahardarAwassa Kenema
69%No goal after half-time44%
BahardarAwassa Kenema

Bahardar - second-half results

25% W63% R13% P
17
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding417%

Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Awassa Kenema - second-half results

56% W31% R13% P
17
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding263%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Bahardar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.00.6
1 goal0%20%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Awassa Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.20
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Bahardar
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
2
31-45
3
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Awassa Kenema
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
3
3
16-30
1
4
31-45
4
1
46-60
4
0
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.57
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
30%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Bahardar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Awassa Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.67
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.58
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

BahardarLigaAwassa Kenema
Average goals in match 1.311.78 1.81
Both teams scored 31%43% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 25%29% 25%
Clean sheets 63%40% 31%
Goal before half-time 19%57% 69%
Goal after half-time 44%57% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Bahardar vs Awassa Kenema?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Bahardar 0:0 Awassa Kenema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Bahardar vs Awassa Kenema?

Bahardar score 0.69 goals per game on average and Awassa Kenema 1.13. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 29% of games. Both teams score in 31% of Bahardar's matches and 44% of Awassa Kenema's.

What form are Bahardar and Awassa Kenema in?

Over the last 5 games Bahardar have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Awassa Kenema 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bahardar vs Awassa Kenema?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Bahardar vs Awassa Kenema: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.