Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Bahardar vs Dire Dawa Kenema: match statistics

Bahardar crest
Bahardar
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Dire Dawa Kenema crest
Dire Dawa Kenema
150%(1.93)
X30%(2.90)
220%(4.12)

Bahardar demonstrates solid home form with a 50% win rate and an impressive 67% clean sheet record at their home stadium. The hosts hold a positive goal difference of +3 in home fixtures, averaging 1.17 goals scored while conceding just 0.67 per match. Dire Dawa Kenema exhibits offensive struggles on the road, averaging only 0.8 goals, with a failure to score in 40% of their away games. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.49 vs 1.02), and their superiority in shots on target (4 vs 2.2) underscores their greater efficiency. Although both teams share an identical PPG (1.2) over the last five matches, Bahardar's home advantage combined with the visitors' lack of scoring punch points towards a home victory, though a draw remains a viable scenario.

Bahardar vs Dire Dawa Kenema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Bahardar played Dire Dawa Kenema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 5 January 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Bahardar: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Dire Dawa Kenema: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Bahardar scores 0.75 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. Dire Dawa Kenema scores 0.75 and concedes 1.17. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Bahardar 33%, Dire Dawa Kenema 42%. Over 2.5: Bahardar 25%, Dire Dawa Kenema 33%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Bahardar has higher xG: 1.27 vs 1.06. Bahardar: 8.9 shots per match, Dire Dawa Kenema: 6.7.

Match halves

Bahardar: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.50. Dire Dawa Kenema: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Bahardar: 76-90+ (4 goals). Dire Dawa Kenema: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Bahardar demonstrates solid home form with a 50% win rate and an impressive 67% clean sheet record at their home stadium. The hosts hold a positive goal difference of +3 in home fixtures, averaging 1.17 goals scored while conceding just 0.67 per match. Dire Dawa Kenema exhibits offensive struggles on the road, averaging only 0.8 goals, with a failure to score in 40% of their away games. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.49 vs 1.02), and their superiority in shots on target (4 vs 2.2) underscores their greater efficiency. Although both teams share an identical PPG (1.2) over the last five matches, Bahardar's home advantage combined with the visitors' lack of scoring punch points towards a home victory, though a draw remains a viable scenario.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
8Shots6
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
2Shots on target1
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
0.96xG0.64
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
4Corners3
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
42Dangerous attacks25
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
18Fouls7
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
0Cards0
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
0.75Goals scored / match0.75
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
0.75Goals conceded / match1.17
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
52%Average possession57%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
3Shots on target / match2.5
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.92Shots per match6.67
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
3Shots on target2.5
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
8.4%Shot conversion11.3%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
52%Possession57%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
1.27xG for1.06
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
1.2xG against1.44
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema

Shooting quality

Bahardar: BalancedDire Dawa Kenema: Balanced
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
Accuracy (shots on target)34%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Bahardar
WLDDD
Season result split
25% W50% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-3
1.25 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DLWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Dire Dawa Kenema
DDDWL
Season result split
33% W33% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-4
1.33 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WLDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Bahardar is 56% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.75 goals / match - Bahardar · 1.17 goals / match - Dire Dawa Kenema

Bahardar scoring profile: strong

Bahardar scores in 50% of matches (6 of 12 matches), while Dire Dawa Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).

Dire Dawa Kenema scoring profile: more difficult

Dire Dawa Kenema scores in 50% of matches (6 of 12 matches), while Bahardar keeps a clean sheet in 58% (7 of 12 matches).

9Goals scored (season)9
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
9Goals conceded (season)14
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
1.5Average goals in match1.92
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
2Goals scored (last 5)4
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal50%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
17%2 goals25%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
8%3 goals0%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
0%4 goals0%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema

How often they concede at least...

42%1 goal75%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
17%2 goals33%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
17%3 goals8%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
0%4 goals0%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

44%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time8%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
0%BTTS in both halves0%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
8%Scored in both halves8%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
20%BTTS - last 560%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

25%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time8%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Bahardar is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.08 pts / match - Bahardar · 0.83 pts / match - Dire Dawa Kenema

Bahardar - half-time state
8% leading83% draw8% trailing
Dire Dawa Kenema - half-time state
17% leading33% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.08Points per match (1st half)0.83
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
0.25Goals scored (1st half)0.25
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
0.58Average goals (1st half)0.83
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
83%Clean sheet before half-time42%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
75%No goal before half-time75%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.08
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
0.42Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
0.92Average goals (2nd half)1.08
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
67%Clean sheet after half-time50%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema
67%No goal after half-time67%
BahardarDire Dawa Kenema

Bahardar - second-half results

25% W58% R17% P
13
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding313%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dire Dawa Kenema - second-half results

25% W33% R42% P
10
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Bahardar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.40.6
1 goal20%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Dire Dawa Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Bahardar
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Dire Dawa Kenema
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
4
31-45
1
1
46-60
2
2
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.71
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Bahardar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
44% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
44%

Dire Dawa Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

BahardarLigaDire Dawa Kenema
Average goals in match 1.501.78 1.92
Both teams scored 33%44% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 25%28% 33%
Clean sheets 58%38% 25%
Goal before half-time 25%59% 75%
Goal after half-time 50%59% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
0.89
Home goals / match
0.89
Away goals / match
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Bahardar vs Dire Dawa Kenema?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Bahardar 0:0 Dire Dawa Kenema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Bahardar vs Dire Dawa Kenema?

Bahardar score 0.75 goals per game on average and Dire Dawa Kenema 0.75. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Bahardar's matches and 42% of Dire Dawa Kenema's.

What form are Bahardar and Dire Dawa Kenema in?

Over the last 5 games Bahardar have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Dire Dawa Kenema 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bahardar vs Dire Dawa Kenema?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Bahardar vs Dire Dawa Kenema: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.