Bahardar vs Fasil Ketema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Bahardar played Fasil Ketema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 24 December 2025. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Bahardar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Fasil Ketema: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Bahardar scores 0.90 and concedes 0.90 goals per match. Fasil Ketema scores 0.90 and concedes 0.30. League average: 1.80 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Bahardar 40%, Fasil Ketema 30%. Over 2.5: Bahardar 30%, Fasil Ketema 0%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Fasil Ketema has higher xG: 1.24 vs 1.22. Bahardar: 8.0 shots per match, Fasil Ketema: 7.9.

Match halves

Bahardar: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.60. Fasil Ketema: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Bahardar: 76-90+ (4 goals). Fasil Ketema: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.80 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
BahardarFasil Ketema
18Shots24
BahardarFasil Ketema
5Shots on target7
BahardarFasil Ketema
1.82xG2.44
BahardarFasil Ketema
2Corners4
BahardarFasil Ketema
47Dangerous attacks62
BahardarFasil Ketema
16Fouls14
BahardarFasil Ketema
0Cards0
BahardarFasil Ketema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.9Goals scored / match0.9
BahardarFasil Ketema
0.9Goals conceded / match0.3
BahardarFasil Ketema
52%Average possession45%
BahardarFasil Ketema
2.7Shots on target / match3
BahardarFasil Ketema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8Shots per match7.9
BahardarFasil Ketema
2.7Shots on target3
BahardarFasil Ketema
11.3%Shot conversion11.4%
BahardarFasil Ketema
52%Possession45%
BahardarFasil Ketema
1.22xG for1.24
BahardarFasil Ketema
1.15xG against1.17
BahardarFasil Ketema

Shooting quality

Bahardar: BalancedFasil Ketema: Balanced
BahardarFasil Ketema
Accuracy (shots on target)34%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fasil Ketema is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Bahardar · 1.8 pts / match - Fasil Ketema

Bahardar
WLWLD
Season result split
30% W40% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-3
1.30 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Fasil Ketema
DWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-0
Last 5 away
2-2-0
WDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fasil Ketema is 200% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.9 goals / match - Bahardar · 0.3 goals / match - Fasil Ketema

Bahardar scoring profile: more difficult

Bahardar scores in 60% of matches (6 of 10 matches), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 70% (7 of 10 matches).

Fasil Ketema scoring profile: strong

Fasil Ketema scores in 80% of matches (8 of 10 matches), while Bahardar keeps a clean sheet in 50% (5 of 10 matches).

9Goals scored (season)9
BahardarFasil Ketema
9Goals conceded (season)3
BahardarFasil Ketema
1.8Average goals in match1.2
BahardarFasil Ketema
4Goals scored (last 5)4
BahardarFasil Ketema
4Goals conceded (last 5)2
BahardarFasil Ketema

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal80%
BahardarFasil Ketema
20%2 goals10%
BahardarFasil Ketema
10%3 goals0%
BahardarFasil Ketema
0%4 goals0%
BahardarFasil Ketema

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal30%
BahardarFasil Ketema
20%2 goals0%
BahardarFasil Ketema
20%3 goals0%
BahardarFasil Ketema
0%4 goals0%
BahardarFasil Ketema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

44%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time10%
BahardarFasil Ketema
0%BTTS in both halves0%
BahardarFasil Ketema
10%Scored in both halves0%
BahardarFasil Ketema

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
BahardarFasil Ketema
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
BahardarFasil Ketema
20%BTTS - last 540%
BahardarFasil Ketema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

30%Min. 1 goal before half-time40%
BahardarFasil Ketema
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time10%
BahardarFasil Ketema
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
BahardarFasil Ketema

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
BahardarFasil Ketema
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
BahardarFasil Ketema
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
BahardarFasil Ketema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fasil Ketema is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.1 pts / match - Bahardar · 1.6 pts / match - Fasil Ketema

Bahardar - half-time state
10% leading80% draw10% trailing
Fasil Ketema - half-time state
30% leading70% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per match (1st half)1.6
BahardarFasil Ketema
0.3Goals scored (1st half)0.4
BahardarFasil Ketema
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.1
BahardarFasil Ketema
0.7Average goals (1st half)0.5
BahardarFasil Ketema
80%Clean sheet before half-time90%
BahardarFasil Ketema
70%No goal before half-time60%
BahardarFasil Ketema

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1.5
BahardarFasil Ketema
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
BahardarFasil Ketema
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.2
BahardarFasil Ketema
1.1Average goals (2nd half)0.7
BahardarFasil Ketema
60%Clean sheet after half-time80%
BahardarFasil Ketema
60%No goal after half-time60%
BahardarFasil Ketema

Bahardar - second-half results

30% W50% R20% P
11
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fasil Ketema - second-half results

30% W60% R10% P
16
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding167%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Bahardar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.41.2
1 goal20%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Fasil Ketema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.21.0
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Bahardar
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Fasil Ketema
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
83%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Bahardar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
44% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
44%

Fasil Ketema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.87
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
32%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

BahardarLigaFasil Ketema
Average goals in match 1.801.80 1.20
Both teams scored 40%44% 30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 30%28% 0%
Clean sheets 50%37% 70%
Goal before half-time 30%58% 40%
Goal after half-time 60%60% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.80
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
0.93
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Bahardar vs Fasil Ketema?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Bahardar 0:0 Fasil Ketema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Bahardar vs Fasil Ketema?

Bahardar score 0.90 goals per game on average and Fasil Ketema 0.90. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Bahardar's matches and 30% of Fasil Ketema's.

What form are Bahardar and Fasil Ketema in?

Over the last 5 games Bahardar have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Fasil Ketema 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bahardar vs Fasil Ketema?

The statistical background for Bahardar vs Fasil Ketema — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.