Bahardar vs Sheger Ketema: match statistics
Bahardar vs Sheger Ketema: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Bahardar played Sheger Ketema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 20 April 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Bahardar: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Sheger Ketema: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Bahardar scores 0.74 and concedes 0.70 goals per match. Sheger Ketema scores 0.92 and concedes 0.92. League average: 1.80 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Bahardar 33%, Sheger Ketema 50%. Over 2.5: Bahardar 22%, Sheger Ketema 27%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 28%.
xG, shots and style
Bahardar has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.18. Bahardar: 8.4 shots per match, Sheger Ketema: 8.2.
Match halves
Bahardar: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.56. Sheger Ketema: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.62.
Goals by minute
Bahardar: 46-60 (6 goals). Sheger Ketema: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ethiopia Premier League: 1.80 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 28%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a draw (X): the primary argument is Bahardar’s high home draw rate — 54% of their home matches end in a draw — and a high clean sheet rate of 62%, which makes it difficult for opponents to score. The home defense looks solid: Bahardar concedes only 0.69 goals per home match on average and have allowed a total of 2 goals in their last 5 matches, while Sheger Ketema conceded 4 goals in their last 5 and average 1.08 goals conceded away. The home attack is limited — home goals average 0.85 with 54% of matches without scoring — whereas Sheger have 24 goals this season versus 20 for the hosts and better shot conversion: 12% conversion vs 9%. The xG indicator shows parity (Bahardar xG For 1.35 vs Sheger xG For 1.24), and chance metrics suggest few clear opportunities: 3.31 shots on target per match for the hosts vs 2.5 for the visitors. Considering form (Bahardar 1.8 pts per match in the last 5, Sheger 1.6) and the hosts’ defensive edge, I assign 45% to the draw, 35% to a Bahardar win and 20% to a Sheger Ketema win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Based on xG, both teams recently exceed 1.0: Bahardar has 1.24 xG in the last 5 matches, Sheger 1.39, giving a combined xG of 2.63 which suggests both sides create scoring chances. Seasonally Bahardar has BTTS in 57% of matches and Sheger 42%, but in the last 5 matches guest BTTS is 60% versus 40% for the home side, reinforcing the signal for both teams to score. Additionally, Bahardar averages 1.0 scored and concedes 0.4 in the last 5, while Sheger scores 1.2 and concedes 0.8, showing both teams have recently been both scoring and conceding. Counterarguments are the high clean sheet rates (43% and 42%) and low propensity for matches over 2.5 goals this season (29% and 25%), which reduce BTTS frequency. Balancing these signals (combined xG 2.63, seasonal 57% BTTS for the home team and 60% BTTS for the away team in the last 5), I tip BTTS - Yes with a probability of 60% versus 40% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects 1.18 expected goals for Bahardar (xG 1.13, opponent concedes on average xG 1.22) and 1.15 for Sheger Ketema (xG 1.24, opponent concedes 1.07), totaling 2.33 goals. With that total, a Poisson distribution implies ~68% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~41% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~21% for over 3.5 goals. Seasonal stats confirm the advantage of the 1.5 line – it was exceeded in 57% of Bahardar’s matches and 58% of Sheger’s, while the 2.5 line occurred in only 29% and 25% of cases. Last 5 matches show Bahardar scoring 5 and conceding 2 (1.0/0.4 avg) and Sheger 6 and 4 (1.2/0.8), slightly lifting scoring rates but not decisively pushing the expected total above 3.0. Given these numbers the strongest signal is Over 1.5, therefore I recommend a bet on Over at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The half is most likely to end level: Bahardar drew at half-time in 86% of matches and Sheger Ketema in 75%, giving an average of about an 81% chance of a draw at the break. After the break, however, the visitors have the edge — their average goals in the second half are 1.75 versus the hosts’ 0.79, and average goals scored in the 2nd half are 0.83 vs 0.43, indicating greater activity and efficiency from Sheger Ketema after the interval. Additionally, the visitors won 33% of matches compared to 14% for the hosts, have slightly higher xG (1.24 vs 1.13) and more shots per game (9.17 vs 7.29), so they are more likely to tip the result after half-time. Therefore my strongest signal is a draw at half-time and a win for the visitors at full-time (X/2) — I assign this scenario a 42% probability, with the second most likely being draw/draw (X/X) at 30%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Bahardar | Sheger Ketema | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Bahardar is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Bahardar · 1.6 pts / match - Sheger Ketema
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sheger Ketema is 24% better for: goals scored per match.
0.74 goals / match - Bahardar · 0.92 goals / match - Sheger Ketema
Bahardar is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.7 goals / match - Bahardar · 0.92 goals / match - Sheger Ketema
Bahardar scores in 48% of matches (13 of 27 matches), while Sheger Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 42% (11 of 26 matches).
Sheger Ketema scores in 69% of matches (18 of 26 matches), while Bahardar keeps a clean sheet in 56% (15 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bahardar
Over / Under - Sheger Ketema
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sheger Ketema is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Bahardar · 1.15 pts / match - Sheger Ketema
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bahardar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Sheger Ketema - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Bahardar
Sheger Ketema
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Bahardar | Liga | Sheger Ketema | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.44 | 1.80 | • 1.85 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 42% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 22% | 28% | • 27% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 56% | 39% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 30% | 55% | ▼ 38% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 48% | 59% | ▲ 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Sheger KetemaGoalBiniyam Fikru
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Bahardar 0 - 0 - 1 Sheger Ketema. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Bahardar vs Sheger Ketema?
The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Bahardar 0:2 Sheger Ketema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Bahardar vs Sheger Ketema?
Bahardar score 0.74 goals per game on average and Sheger Ketema 0.92. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Bahardar's matches and 50% of Sheger Ketema's.
What form are Bahardar and Sheger Ketema in?
Over the last 5 games Bahardar have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Sheger Ketema 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bahardar vs Sheger Ketema?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Bahardar vs Sheger Ketema: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


