Bahardar vs Welwalo Adigrat Uni: match statistics
Bahardar vs Welwalo Adigrat Uni: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Bahardar played Welwalo Adigrat Uni in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Bahardar: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Welwalo Adigrat Uni: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Bahardar scores 0.77 and concedes 0.73 goals per match. Welwalo Adigrat Uni scores 0.87 and concedes 1.10. League average: 1.78 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Bahardar 33%, Welwalo Adigrat Uni 48%. Over 2.5: Bahardar 20%, Welwalo Adigrat Uni 35%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 27%.
xG, shots and style
Bahardar has higher xG: 1.24 vs 1.01. Bahardar: 8.3 shots per match, Welwalo Adigrat Uni: 5.5.
Match halves
Bahardar: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.57. Welwalo Adigrat Uni: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.42.
Goals by minute
Bahardar: 46-60 (7 goals). Welwalo Adigrat Uni: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 27%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a draw because Bahardar have a solid home defense — conceding 0.8 goals per game on average and 53% clean sheets — but a weak attacking output (0.8 goals scored per game and 53% of matches without scoring). However, the hosts create more chances: on average 8.93 shots (3.27 on target) and xG 1.34 at home, versus 6.07 shots (2.6 on target) and xG 1.06 for the visitors, giving Bahardar an advantage in chance quality. Welwalo convert better on the road (conversion 18% versus the hosts’ 9%) and score 1.07 goals away, but they concede 1.0 goal on average and have 32 goals conceded this season versus Bahardar’s 22, which weakens their prospects of holding a lead. In the last five matches Bahardar have a record of 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss (1.6 points per game), while Welwalo have 2 wins and 3 losses (1.2 points per game), so form slightly favors the hosts but does not decide the outcome. Therefore I assign the highest probability to a draw: 45% draw, 35% home win and 20% away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I recommend BTTS - Yes with a 65% probability versus 35% for No, because recent signals and metrics favor both teams scoring. In the last 5 matches BTTS stands at 60% (60% for home and 60% for away), and seasonally Welwalo has 60% BTTS versus 40% for Bahardar, giving an edge to the away side in goal history. Bahardar averages 0.73 goals scored and concedes 1.13, while Welwalo scores 1.07 and concedes 1.00, meaning both teams concede roughly 1 goal per game. xG also indicates chances for both sides: home xG 0.97 versus 1.06 for the away team, and xG against around 1.12–1.13; additionally Welwalo registers 2.6 shots on target versus 1.93 for Bahardar and has a higher conversion rate 18% versus 14%. Considering that in the last 5 matches the home team averaged 1.2 scored and 1.0 conceded, while the away team averaged 1.6 scored and 1.4 conceded, the recent forms and higher shooting efficiency of the away side strengthen the signal for BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The combined xG points to a moderately offensive fixture: home xG 0.97 and xG against the visitors 1.13 imply expected goals for the home side of ≈1.05, while visitors’ xG_for 1.06 and home xG_against 1.12 imply ≈1.09 for the away side, totaling ~2.14 goals. Both teams have 60% of season matches with over 1.5 goals (seasonOver15Percentage_home and away = 60) and the projected 2.14 is clearly above the league average of 1.78, so I rate OVER 1.5 at 72%. In the last 5 matches the home team averages 1.2 goals and the visitors 1.6 (6 and 8 goals in the last 5), and the visitors have 60% of recent matches over 2.5, which raises the chance of OVER 2.5 to 42% but does not make it dominant. On-target shots 1.93 vs 2.6 and conversion rates 14% vs 18% along with BTTS 40% vs 60% suggest both sides have realistic scoring chances, but the low frequency of matches with over 3.5 goals (7% and 13%) limits OVER 3.5 to around 10%, hence the recommendation of OVER 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Half-time draws are the most common: both teams were level at the break in 8 of 15 matches (53%), the home side led in 6 of 15 (40%), and the visitors only in 1 of 15 (7%). Welwalo has a statistical advantage in second halves — average second-half points are 1.47 for the visitors versus 0.67 for Bahardar, and the second-half goal difference is +6 for the visitors versus −10 for the hosts. Offensively the visitors generate more high-quality chances: xG 1.06 vs 0.97, 2.6 shots on target vs 1.93 and a higher conversion rate 18% vs 14%, which favors scoring after the break. On this basis I assign the highest probability to the HT/FT scenario X/2 — draw at half-time and away win — at 33%, with 1/1 at 24%, because although hosts frequently lead at the break (40%), the second-half statistics and the visitors’ efficiency indicate their advantage after the turnaround.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Bahardar | Welwalo Adigrat Uni | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Bahardar is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Bahardar · 1.2 pts / match - Welwalo Adigrat Uni
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Welwalo Adigrat Uni is 13% better for: goals scored per match.
0.77 goals / match - Bahardar · 0.87 goals / match - Welwalo Adigrat Uni
Bahardar is 51% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.73 goals / match - Bahardar · 1.1 goals / match - Welwalo Adigrat Uni
Bahardar scores in 50% of matches (15 of 30 matches), while Welwalo Adigrat Uni keeps a clean sheet in 32% (10 of 31 matches).
Welwalo Adigrat Uni scores in 61% of matches (19 of 31 matches), while Bahardar keeps a clean sheet in 53% (16 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bahardar
Over / Under - Welwalo Adigrat Uni
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Welwalo Adigrat Uni is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.97 pts / match - Bahardar · 1.23 pts / match - Welwalo Adigrat Uni
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bahardar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Welwalo Adigrat Uni - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Bahardar
Welwalo Adigrat Uni
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Bahardar | Liga | Welwalo Adigrat Uni | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.50 | 1.78 | ▲ 1.97 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 41% | ▲ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 20% | 27% | ▲ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 53% | 40% | ▼ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 33% | 54% | ▲ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 47% | 59% | ▼ 52% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Bahardar 0 - 1 - 0 Welwalo Adigrat Uni. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Bahardar vs Welwalo Adigrat Uni?
The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Bahardar 0:0 Welwalo Adigrat Uni. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Bahardar vs Welwalo Adigrat Uni?
Bahardar score 0.77 goals per game on average and Welwalo Adigrat Uni 0.87. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Bahardar's matches and 48% of Welwalo Adigrat Uni's.
What form are Bahardar and Welwalo Adigrat Uni in?
Over the last 5 games Bahardar have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Welwalo Adigrat Uni 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bahardar vs Welwalo Adigrat Uni?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


