Malta - Maltese Premier LeagueTa'Qali National StadiumData current as of 02 November 2026

Balzan vs Hibernians: match statistics

Balzan crest
Balzan
1 : 2half-time 1:0
Hibernians crest
Hibernians

Balzan vs Hibernians: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Balzan played Hibernians in Maltese Premier League (Malta). The match was played on 31 October 2026. Venue: Ta'Qali National Stadium. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Balzan: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Hibernians: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Balzan scores 1.20 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. Hibernians scores 1.10 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.85 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Balzan 70%, Hibernians 50%. Over 2.5: Balzan 50%, Hibernians 40%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Balzan has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.02. Balzan: 10.1 shots per match, Hibernians: 7.0.

Match halves

Balzan: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.60. Hibernians: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Balzan: 0-15 (5 goals). Hibernians: 61-75 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Maltese Premier League: 2.85 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

A draw looks the most likely outcome: Balzan have drawn 3 of their last 5 matches, while Hibernians have finished level in 50% of their away games. The visitors have been more clinical recently, winning 2 of their last 5 matches and scoring 6 goals, while the hosts have failed to win and have scored just 3. Balzan’s advantage, however, lies in the quality of the chances they create at home, with an average xG of 1.46 compared to Hibernians’ 1.12 away from home. Both teams concede an average of 1 goal per match in these conditions, although Hibernians have conceded 8 goals in their last 5 matches, compared to 6 for Balzan. The visitors’ better recent form therefore offsets the hosts’ edge in chance creation, pointing to a closely contested result.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Balzan’s scoring output is the main obstacle to BTTS - Yes: the hosts average 0.8 goals per match and failed to score in 40% of their games. Their average has fallen to 0.6 goals over the last 5 matches, although Hibernians have conceded 1.6 goals per match over that period, giving Balzan a genuine chance of finding the net. Hibernians look more convincing going forward, averaging 1.25 goals compared with Balzan’s 0.8 and registering 3.75 shots on target compared with 2.6. Both teams scored in 60% of their respective last 5 matches, but their season-long figures are only 40% and 50%. As a result, it is slightly more likely that at least one side will fail to score (BTTS - No) than that both teams will find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: this outcome occurred in 80% of Balzan’s matches and 75% of Hibernians’ games. The teams average 0.8 and 1.25 goals scored respectively, and neither has scored more than 2 goals in the matches analysed. Although Balzan concede an average of 1.6 goals, their limited attacking output reduces the likelihood of a very high-scoring game; the expected total is around 2.3 goals. Over their last 5 matches, Balzan averaged just 0.6 goals, while Hibernians scored 1.2, further supporting Under 3.5 rather than the riskier 2.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest single scenario is Hibernians leading at the break and going on to win, although a half-time draw remains a realistic possibility. The visitors led at half-time in 2 of their 4 matches this season, while Balzan were trailing at the break in 2 of their 5; before half-time, Hibernians average 0.75 goals compared with the hosts’ 0.4. Across the full match, the visitors average 1.25 goals to Balzan’s 0.8 and record 3.75 shots on target compared with 2.6. The last five matches also favour Hibernians: they have won 2, while Balzan have not won any. Caution is warranted, however, as Hibernians were level at half-time in 3 of their last 5 matches, making a half-time draw followed by an away win the main alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
BalzanHibernians
6Shots2
BalzanHibernians
3Shots on target2
BalzanHibernians
1.01xG0.66
BalzanHibernians
5Corners4
BalzanHibernians
58Dangerous attacks52
BalzanHibernians
11Fouls14
BalzanHibernians
0Cards0
BalzanHibernians

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.2Goals scored / match1.1
BalzanHibernians
1.2Goals conceded / match1.4
BalzanHibernians
47%Average possession46%
BalzanHibernians
4.6Shots on target / match2.9
BalzanHibernians

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.1Shots per match7
BalzanHibernians
4.6Shots on target2.9
BalzanHibernians
11.9%Shot conversion15.7%
BalzanHibernians
47%Possession46%
BalzanHibernians
1.35xG for1.02
BalzanHibernians
1.31xG against1.18
BalzanHibernians

Shooting quality

Balzan: BalancedHibernians: Counter-attacking
BalzanHibernians
Accuracy (shots on target)46%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Hibernians is 167% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Balzan · 1.6 pts / match - Hibernians

Balzan
DDLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W50% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-3
1.10 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Hibernians
LDWWD
Season result split
30% W40% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-3
1.30 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-1
Last 5 away
1-3-1
WLDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 0.87Opponent xG: 0.90BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Balzan is 9% better for: goals scored per match.

1.2 goals / match - Balzan · 1.1 goals / match - Hibernians

Balzan is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.2 goals / match - Balzan · 1.4 goals / match - Hibernians

Balzan scoring profile: very strong

Balzan scores in 80% of matches (8 of 10 matches), while Hibernians keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 matches).

Hibernians scoring profile: very strong

Hibernians scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Balzan keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 matches).

12Goals scored (season)11
BalzanHibernians
12Goals conceded (season)14
BalzanHibernians
2.4Average goals in match2.5
BalzanHibernians
3Goals scored (last 5)7
BalzanHibernians
6Goals conceded (last 5)9
BalzanHibernians

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal70%
BalzanHibernians
30%2 goals40%
BalzanHibernians
10%3 goals0%
BalzanHibernians
0%4 goals0%
BalzanHibernians

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal80%
BalzanHibernians
40%2 goals40%
BalzanHibernians
0%3 goals10%
BalzanHibernians
0%4 goals10%
BalzanHibernians

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time20%
BalzanHibernians
0%BTTS in both halves10%
BalzanHibernians
10%Scored in both halves30%
BalzanHibernians

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
BalzanHibernians
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
BalzanHibernians
60%BTTS - last 560%
BalzanHibernians

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time90%
BalzanHibernians
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
BalzanHibernians
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
BalzanHibernians

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
BalzanHibernians
10%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
BalzanHibernians
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
BalzanHibernians

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Balzan - half-time state
30% leading30% draw40% trailing
Hibernians - half-time state
30% leading30% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per match (1st half)1.2
BalzanHibernians
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.5
BalzanHibernians
0.7Goals conceded (1st half)0.7
BalzanHibernians
1.3Average goals (1st half)1.2
BalzanHibernians
40%Clean sheet before half-time40%
BalzanHibernians
60%No goal before half-time50%
BalzanHibernians

After half-time (2nd half)

1.6Points per match (2nd half)1.4
BalzanHibernians
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
BalzanHibernians
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
BalzanHibernians
1.1Average goals (2nd half)1.3
BalzanHibernians
50%Clean sheet after half-time40%
BalzanHibernians
50%No goal after half-time50%
BalzanHibernians

Balzan - second-half results

50% W10% D40% L
12
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Hibernians - second-half results

40% W20% D40% L
12
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Balzan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Hibernians - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Balzan
ScoredConceded
5
0
0-15
1
3
16-30
0
4
31-45
1
0
46-60
3
2
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Hibernians
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
4
31-45
0
1
46-60
3
1
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Balzan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 42% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Hibernians

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Maltese Premier League).

Teams vs league

BalzanLigaHibernians
Average goals in match▼ 2.402.85▼ 2.50
Both teams scored▲ 70%60%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%55%▼ 40%
Clean sheets▼ 20%22%▼ 20%
Goal before half-time• 80%81%▲ 90%
Goal after half-time▲ 90%85%▲ 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.85
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.45
Away goals / match
+-3%
Home attack advantage
+-4%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. HiberniansGoalMoritz Römling
  2. HiberniansGoalJoseph Essien Mbong

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Balzan vs Hibernians?

The Maltese Premier League match finished Balzan 1:2 Hibernians. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Balzan vs Hibernians?

Balzan score 1.20 goals per game on average and Hibernians 1.10. The Maltese Premier League average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Balzan's matches and 50% of Hibernians's.

What form are Balzan and Hibernians in?

Over the last 5 games Balzan have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Hibernians 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Balzan vs Hibernians?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Balzan vs Hibernians: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.