Armenia - Armenian Premier LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Banants vs Alashkert: match statistics

Banants crest
Banants
0 : 4half-time 1:1
Alashkert crest
Alashkert

Banants vs Alashkert: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Banants played Alashkert in Armenian Premier League (Armenia). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 0:4.

Current form

Banants: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Alashkert: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Banants scores 1.90 and concedes 0.70 goals per match. Alashkert scores 1.43 and concedes 0.86. League average: 2.50 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Banants 45%, Alashkert 43%. Over 2.5: Banants 40%, Alashkert 38%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Alashkert has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.29. Banants: 10.4 shots per match, Alashkert: 11.4.

Match halves

Banants: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.15. Alashkert: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.62.

Goals by minute

Banants: 76-90+ (11 goals). Alashkert: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Armenian Premier League: 2.50 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Banants holds a clear offensive advantage and superior form: they have scored 38 goals this season versus 30 by Alashkert, and in the last 5 matches have 10 goals compared to the visitors' 6. At home Banants averages 2.56 goals per game and 5.11 shots on target with a conversion rate of 22%, while Alashkert away records 1.5 goals per game, 3.9 shots on target and a 14% conversion. Defensively the hosts are stronger: Banants concedes 0.89 goals at home and keeps 44% clean sheets, whereas Alashkert concedes 1.2 goals away and has only 10% clean sheets. The xG of both teams is similar (Banants xG 1.43 vs Alashkert xG 1.35), but Banants' higher finishing efficiency and better points return in the last 5 matches (2.0 points per game vs 1.4) favor a home win. Therefore I tip a Banants victory and estimate probabilities of 65% for the hosts, 20% for a draw and 15% for an Alashkert win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict No BTTS (No). Over the season Banants concede an average of 0.55 goals per home match and have a 64% clean sheet rate, which significantly reduces the likelihood of Goal/Goal. However, Banants have produced BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches, averaging 2.0 scored and 1.4 conceded in that period, which introduces some risk to the No BTTS thesis. Alashkert have 70% of matches with BTTS over the season and average 1.5 goals away, but in their last 5 matches they show only 40% BTTS with averages of 1.2 scored and 1.0 conceded. Considering Banants’ seasonal defensive advantage (home xG 1.54 vs xG against 0.86 and 38 goals scored to 14 conceded), I estimate 60% for No and 40% for Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate Banants will generate about 1.37 expected goals (xG for 1.54 and Alashkert’s average xG conceded 1.20), and Alashkert about 1.11 (xG for 1.35 and Banants’ average xG conceded 0.86), totaling 2.48 expected goals. Both teams frequently participate in matches with at least 2 goals: Banants 73% of such matches this season, Alashkert 70%, hence I rate Over 1.5 at roughly 71%. However, with a combined xG of 2.48 the probability of 3+ goals is only about 45%, and 4+ goals about 24%, so the signal for Over 2.5/3.5 is weaker. Additionally, Banants have 64% clean sheets this season and 0% of matches with 4+ goals, while Alashkert have 30% of matches with 4+; this makes the strongest and most conservative choice Under 3.5 (≈76%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Banants performs markedly better in first halves and defensively: they led at the break in 6 matches (55%), average 0.73 goals by half-time while conceding 0.36, and keep a clean sheet after the first half in 73% of cases. Alashkert scores on average 1.5 goals per match versus Banants’ 1.36, and in 70% of their games both teams score at least once, but the visitors also concede 1.2 goals per match on average with an xG against of 1.2. Banants also generates higher xG (1.54 vs 1.35) and shoots on target more often (5.0 vs 3.9), and after the break the hosts concede only 0.18 goals on average, which increases the chance of maintaining a lead. For these reasons the most likely scenario is 1/1 (Banants leading at half-time and winning) — I assign it a 44% probability; alternatives are a draw after the break with the hosts leading at half-time (1/X 7%) or a later victory for the visitors (2/2 14%), since Alashkert often scores but also concedes more. Additionally, Banants win 64% of home matches and keep clean sheets in 64% season-wide, which confirms the home advantage and supports the 1/1 selection.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
BanantsAlashkert
9Shots11
BanantsAlashkert
3Shots on target5
BanantsAlashkert
1xG1.35
BanantsAlashkert
4Corners4
BanantsAlashkert
31Dangerous attacks42
BanantsAlashkert
16Fouls18
BanantsAlashkert
7Cards2
BanantsAlashkert

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.9Goals scored / match1.43
BanantsAlashkert
0.7Goals conceded / match0.86
BanantsAlashkert
54%Average possession54%
BanantsAlashkert
4.1Shots on target / match4.48
BanantsAlashkert

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.45Shots per match11.43
BanantsAlashkert
4.1Shots on target4.48
BanantsAlashkert
18.2%Shot conversion12.5%
BanantsAlashkert
54%Possession54%
BanantsAlashkert
1.29xG for1.46
BanantsAlashkert
1.24xG against1.01
BanantsAlashkert

Shooting quality

Banants: Efficient finishingAlashkert: Balanced
BanantsAlashkert
Accuracy (shots on target)39%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Banants is 86% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Banants · 1.4 pts / match - Alashkert

Banants
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
60% W30% R10% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-6-2
2.10 pts / match · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Alashkert
LLDWW
Season result split
57% W14% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-3-6
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 0.82BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Banants is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.9 goals / match - Banants · 1.43 goals / match - Alashkert

Banants is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.7 goals / match - Banants · 0.86 goals / match - Alashkert

Banants scoring profile: very strong

Banants scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while Alashkert keeps a clean sheet in 38% (8 of 21 matches).

Alashkert scoring profile: strong

Alashkert scores in 81% of matches (17 of 21 matches), while Banants keeps a clean sheet in 50% (10 of 20 matches).

38Goals scored (season)30
BanantsAlashkert
14Goals conceded (season)18
BanantsAlashkert
2.6Average goals in match2.29
BanantsAlashkert
13Goals scored (last 5)6
BanantsAlashkert
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
BanantsAlashkert

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal81%
BanantsAlashkert
50%2 goals48%
BanantsAlashkert
20%3 goals14%
BanantsAlashkert
20%4 goals0%
BanantsAlashkert

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal62%
BanantsAlashkert
15%2 goals24%
BanantsAlashkert
5%3 goals0%
BanantsAlashkert
0%4 goals0%
BanantsAlashkert

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time14%
BanantsAlashkert
5%BTTS in both halves0%
BanantsAlashkert
30%Scored in both halves29%
BanantsAlashkert

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
BanantsAlashkert
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
BanantsAlashkert
80%BTTS - last 540%
BanantsAlashkert

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
BanantsAlashkert
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
BanantsAlashkert
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
BanantsAlashkert

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
BanantsAlashkert
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
BanantsAlashkert
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
BanantsAlashkert

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Banants is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.85 pts / match - Banants · 1.57 pts / match - Alashkert

Banants - half-time state
50% leading35% draw15% trailing
Alashkert - half-time state
43% leading29% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.85Points per match (1st half)1.57
BanantsAlashkert
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.81
BanantsAlashkert
0.25Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
BanantsAlashkert
1Average goals (1st half)1.29
BanantsAlashkert
80%Clean sheet before half-time62%
BanantsAlashkert
50%No goal before half-time48%
BanantsAlashkert

After half-time (2nd half)

1.85Points per match (2nd half)1.67
BanantsAlashkert
1.15Goals scored (2nd half)0.62
BanantsAlashkert
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
BanantsAlashkert
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1
BanantsAlashkert
60%Clean sheet after half-time67%
BanantsAlashkert
35%No goal after half-time43%
BanantsAlashkert

Banants - second-half results

50% W35% R15% P
37
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding120%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Alashkert - second-half results

43% W38% R19% P
33
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Banants - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.60
Goals scored / match0.81.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+1+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Alashkert - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Banants
ScoredConceded
8
3
0-15
2
1
16-30
5
1
31-45
7
2
46-60
5
3
61-75
11
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Alashkert
ScoredConceded
7
1
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
6
31-45
4
3
46-60
6
2
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.44
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-39%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Banants

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.61
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Alashkert

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
135%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Armenian Premier League).

Teams vs league

BanantsLigaAlashkert
Average goals in match 2.602.50 2.29
Both teams scored 45%46% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%47% 38%
Clean sheets 50%32% 38%
Goal before half-time 65%70% 76%
Goal after half-time 80%78% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.50
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.06
Away goals / match
+36%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AlashkertGoalKaren Nalbandyan
  2. BanantsRed cardAleksandr Mishiev
  3. BanantsSubstitutionOn: Andrija DragojevićOff: Nicholas Kaloukian
  4. AlashkertGoalKaren Nalbandyan
  5. AlashkertSubstitutionOn: Yuri GareginyanOff: Karen Nalbandyan
  6. BanantsYellow cardErik Piloyan
  7. BanantsYellow cardNarek Aghasaryan
  8. BanantsYellow cardAlef Santos de Araujo
  9. BanantsYellow cardNarek Aghasaryan
  10. AlashkertYellow cardEdgar Piloyan
  11. BanantsYellow cardEvgeniy Tsymbalyuk

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Henrik NalbandyanMatches officiated: 13
4.54Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 215%Home wins46%Draws38%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Banants 1 - 0 - 1 Alashkert. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Alashkert FC
0 : 2
FC Banants
FC Banants
0 : 1
Alashkert FC

FAQ

What was the result of Banants vs Alashkert?

The Armenian Premier League match finished Banants 0:4 Alashkert. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Banants and Alashkert?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Banants won 1, Alashkert won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Banants vs Alashkert?

Banants score 1.90 goals per game on average and Alashkert 1.43. The Armenian Premier League average is 2.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Banants's matches and 43% of Alashkert's.

What form are Banants and Alashkert in?

Over the last 5 games Banants have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Alashkert 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Banants vs Alashkert?

The statistical background for Banants vs Alashkert — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.