Argentina - Primera DivisiónData current as of 06 September 2026

Banfield vs Independiente Rivadavia: match statistics

Banfield vs Independiente Rivadavia: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Banfield played Independiente Rivadavia in Primera División (Argentina). The match was played on 20 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Banfield: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Independiente Rivadavia: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Banfield scores 1.08 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. Independiente Rivadavia scores 1.77 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Banfield 46%, Independiente Rivadavia 69%. Over 2.5: Banfield 46%, Independiente Rivadavia 54%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Independiente Rivadavia has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.32. Banfield: 11.5 shots per match, Independiente Rivadavia: 13.5.

Match halves

Banfield: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.69. Independiente Rivadavia: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.92.

Goals by minute

Banfield: 46-60 (4 goals). Independiente Rivadavia: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict an away win (2). Independiente Rivadavia has 9 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses this season, and has won all 5 of its last 5 matches, averaging 3.0 points per game versus Banfield’s 1.2 in the same period. The visitors score 1.8 goals per away game with a shot conversion rate of 16% and 3.6 shots on target per match, while Banfield at home records 1.43 goals, 10% conversion and 4.43 shots on target, indicating superior offensive efficiency for the visitors. Defensively both teams are comparable (Banfield concedes 0.86 goals per home match, Independiente 0.8 away), but the visitors have no clean sheets on the road (0% vs. Banfield’s 14%), which further favors them. Considering the better form (5/5 wins), higher conversion rate and greater goal output by the visitors (23 scored vs. Banfield’s 14), I assess Independiente as more likely to win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Season-long metrics strongly favor BTTS: Banfield has BTTS in 75% of matches, and Independiente Rivadavia in 60%, yielding a baseline average of about 67.5%. Banfield generates more threat (xG 1.76 vs 1.32 for Independiente) and records 6.0 shots on target per match versus 3.6 for their opponent, while Independiente despite creating fewer chances over the season scores 1.8 goals and has netted 10 goals in the last 5 matches (avg 2.0). Factors reducing BTTS probability are recent form – both teams have only 40% BTTS in their last 5 fixtures, and Independiente concedes just 0.4 goals on average in those five games, increasing the likelihood of a clean sheet. However, Banfield’s low clean sheet rate (13% season) and moderate xG conceded against both teams (1.4 and 1.36) plus a high share of home matches over 2.5 goals (63%) suggest at least one goal from either side is likely. On this basis I assign BTTS 70% vs 30% and select BTTS - Yes as the strongest signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Seasonal data strongly favor Over 1.5 goals: Banfield scores an average of 1.75 goals per match, Independiente 1.8, and the percentage of matches with more than 1.5 goals is 88% (Banfield) and 80% (Independiente), averaging 84%. The teams’ xG are 1.76 (Banfield) and 1.32 (Independiente), with xG against of 1.4 and 1.36; modelled expected goals are 1.56 for Banfield and 1.36 for Independiente, totaling 2.92 goals, which exceeds the league average of 2.05. Banfield records 6.0 shots on target per match versus 3.6 for Independiente, and the share of matches in which both teams score is 75% and 60%, increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. Over 2.5 has moderate backing (seasonal Over 2.5: 63% vs 40%), so I assess Over 2.5 at roughly a 55% probability, while Over 3.5 remains unlikely (~23% based on 25% and 20%). The strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5 (≈84% by averages and expected goals 2.92), hence the recommendation to bet Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Banfield has strong first-half statistics: they led at the break in 4 matches (50%) and score an average of 1.0 goals by half-time versus 0.6 for Independiente. The home side also generate higher xG at home (1.76 vs 1.32), take more shots (14.63 vs 11.6) and have more on target (6.0 vs 3.6), which suggests a Banfield advantage before the break. However, Independiente are in excellent form — 5 wins in their last 5 matches and an average of 3.0 points in their last 5 compared to 1.2 for Banfield — and are strong after the break: they score an average of 1.2 goals in second halves and win the second half in 80% of cases. This combination of a strong Banfield start and the visitors’ post-break advantage, along with a high BTTS rate (75% vs 60%), points to a scenario of the home side leading at half-time and a turnaround by Independiente after the break; therefore I pick 1/2 as the most likely HT/FT outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
16Shots16
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
4Shots on target2
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
1.63xG1.55
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
6Corners3
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
48Dangerous attacks56
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
12Fouls8
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
2Cards1
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
1.08Goals scored / match1.77
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
1.31Goals conceded / match1
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
40%Average possession45%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
3.54Shots on target / match5.08
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.46Shots per match13.46
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
3.54Shots on target5.08
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
9.4%Shot conversion13.1%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
40%Possession45%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
1.32xG for1.59
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
1.85xG against1.38
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia

Shooting quality

Banfield: BalancedIndependiente Rivadavia: Counter-attacking
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
Accuracy (shots on target)31%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Independiente Rivadavia is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Banfield · 2.4 pts / match - Independiente Rivadavia

Banfield
LLWLL
Season result split
31% W8% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-8
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 2.01BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Independiente Rivadavia
LWWWW
Season result split
69% W15% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-2-2
2.23 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-0
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Independiente Rivadavia is 64% better for: goals scored per match.

1.08 goals / match - Banfield · 1.77 goals / match - Independiente Rivadavia

Independiente Rivadavia is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.31 goals / match - Banfield · 1 goals / match - Independiente Rivadavia

Banfield scoring profile: very strong

Banfield scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Independiente Rivadavia keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

Independiente Rivadavia scoring profile: very strong

Independiente Rivadavia scores in 92% of matches (12 of 13 matches), while Banfield keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

14Goals scored (season)23
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
17Goals conceded (season)13
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
2.38Average goals in match2.77
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
5Goals scored (last 5)11
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal92%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
31%2 goals62%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
8%3 goals23%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
0%4 goals0%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal77%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
38%2 goals23%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
15%3 goals0%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
0%4 goals0%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

69%
Independiente Rivadavia - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.9 of 13 matches
44%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time31%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
8%BTTS in both halves0%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
15%Scored in both halves46%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS54%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
60%BTTS - last 560%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time85%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
46%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Independiente Rivadavia is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.08 pts / match - Banfield · 1.54 pts / match - Independiente Rivadavia

Banfield - half-time state
23% leading38% draw38% trailing
Independiente Rivadavia - half-time state
38% leading38% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.08Points per match (1st half)1.54
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.85
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
0.69Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
1.08Average goals (1st half)1.54
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
54%Clean sheet before half-time46%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
62%No goal before half-time38%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia

After half-time (2nd half)

1.31Points per match (2nd half)2.08
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.92
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.31
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
1.31Average goals (2nd half)1.23
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
54%Clean sheet after half-time77%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia
54%No goal after half-time23%
BanfieldIndependiente Rivadavia

Banfield - second-half results

31% W38% R31% P
14
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Independiente Rivadavia - second-half results

54% W46% R0% P
20
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding182%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 69%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Banfield - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Independiente Rivadavia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.60
Goals scored / match1.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.0
Average goals in match2.40.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%0%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%100%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+2+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Banfield
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
2
3
16-30
3
3
31-45
4
3
46-60
3
2
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Independiente Rivadavia
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
8
1
16-30
1
7
31-45
4
2
46-60
3
1
61-75
5
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
127%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Banfield

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
152%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Independiente Rivadavia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.56
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
206%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

BanfieldLigaIndependiente Rivadavia
Average goals in match 2.382.03 2.77
Both teams scored 46%44% 69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%34% 54%
Clean sheets 23%35% 23%
Goal before half-time 69%60% 85%
Goal after half-time 77%70% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.03
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.18
Home goals / match
0.86
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. BanfieldSubstitutionOn: Santiago DanieleOff: Danilo Arboleda Hurtado
  2. BanfieldYellow cardSantiago Daniele
  3. Independiente RivadaviaYellow cardAlejo Osella
  4. BanfieldYellow cardIgnacio Pais Mayán
  5. Independiente RivadaviaSubstitutionOn: Luciano GómezOff: Ezequiel Augusto Bonifacio

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Banfield 1 - 1 - 0 Independiente Rivadavia. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

CS Independiente Rivadavia
1 : 2
CA Banfield
CA Banfield
1 : 1
CS Independiente Rivadavia

FAQ

What was the result of Banfield vs Independiente Rivadavia?

The Primera División match finished Banfield 0:0 Independiente Rivadavia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Banfield and Independiente Rivadavia?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Banfield won 1, Independiente Rivadavia won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Banfield vs Independiente Rivadavia?

Banfield score 1.08 goals per game on average and Independiente Rivadavia 1.77. The Primera División average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Banfield's matches and 69% of Independiente Rivadavia's.

What form are Banfield and Independiente Rivadavia in?

Over the last 5 games Banfield have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Independiente Rivadavia 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Banfield vs Independiente Rivadavia?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.