Banfield vs Independiente Rivadavia: match statistics
Banfield vs Independiente Rivadavia: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Banfield played Independiente Rivadavia in Primera División (Argentina). The match was played on 20 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Banfield: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Independiente Rivadavia: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Banfield scores 1.08 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. Independiente Rivadavia scores 1.77 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.03 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Banfield 46%, Independiente Rivadavia 69%. Over 2.5: Banfield 46%, Independiente Rivadavia 54%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 34%.
xG, shots and style
Independiente Rivadavia has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.32. Banfield: 11.5 shots per match, Independiente Rivadavia: 13.5.
Match halves
Banfield: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.69. Independiente Rivadavia: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.92.
Goals by minute
Banfield: 46-60 (4 goals). Independiente Rivadavia: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 34%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win (2). Independiente Rivadavia has 9 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses this season, and has won all 5 of its last 5 matches, averaging 3.0 points per game versus Banfield’s 1.2 in the same period. The visitors score 1.8 goals per away game with a shot conversion rate of 16% and 3.6 shots on target per match, while Banfield at home records 1.43 goals, 10% conversion and 4.43 shots on target, indicating superior offensive efficiency for the visitors. Defensively both teams are comparable (Banfield concedes 0.86 goals per home match, Independiente 0.8 away), but the visitors have no clean sheets on the road (0% vs. Banfield’s 14%), which further favors them. Considering the better form (5/5 wins), higher conversion rate and greater goal output by the visitors (23 scored vs. Banfield’s 14), I assess Independiente as more likely to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season-long metrics strongly favor BTTS: Banfield has BTTS in 75% of matches, and Independiente Rivadavia in 60%, yielding a baseline average of about 67.5%. Banfield generates more threat (xG 1.76 vs 1.32 for Independiente) and records 6.0 shots on target per match versus 3.6 for their opponent, while Independiente despite creating fewer chances over the season scores 1.8 goals and has netted 10 goals in the last 5 matches (avg 2.0). Factors reducing BTTS probability are recent form – both teams have only 40% BTTS in their last 5 fixtures, and Independiente concedes just 0.4 goals on average in those five games, increasing the likelihood of a clean sheet. However, Banfield’s low clean sheet rate (13% season) and moderate xG conceded against both teams (1.4 and 1.36) plus a high share of home matches over 2.5 goals (63%) suggest at least one goal from either side is likely. On this basis I assign BTTS 70% vs 30% and select BTTS - Yes as the strongest signal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Seasonal data strongly favor Over 1.5 goals: Banfield scores an average of 1.75 goals per match, Independiente 1.8, and the percentage of matches with more than 1.5 goals is 88% (Banfield) and 80% (Independiente), averaging 84%. The teams’ xG are 1.76 (Banfield) and 1.32 (Independiente), with xG against of 1.4 and 1.36; modelled expected goals are 1.56 for Banfield and 1.36 for Independiente, totaling 2.92 goals, which exceeds the league average of 2.05. Banfield records 6.0 shots on target per match versus 3.6 for Independiente, and the share of matches in which both teams score is 75% and 60%, increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. Over 2.5 has moderate backing (seasonal Over 2.5: 63% vs 40%), so I assess Over 2.5 at roughly a 55% probability, while Over 3.5 remains unlikely (~23% based on 25% and 20%). The strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5 (≈84% by averages and expected goals 2.92), hence the recommendation to bet Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Banfield has strong first-half statistics: they led at the break in 4 matches (50%) and score an average of 1.0 goals by half-time versus 0.6 for Independiente. The home side also generate higher xG at home (1.76 vs 1.32), take more shots (14.63 vs 11.6) and have more on target (6.0 vs 3.6), which suggests a Banfield advantage before the break. However, Independiente are in excellent form — 5 wins in their last 5 matches and an average of 3.0 points in their last 5 compared to 1.2 for Banfield — and are strong after the break: they score an average of 1.2 goals in second halves and win the second half in 80% of cases. This combination of a strong Banfield start and the visitors’ post-break advantage, along with a high BTTS rate (75% vs 60%), points to a scenario of the home side leading at half-time and a turnaround by Independiente after the break; therefore I pick 1/2 as the most likely HT/FT outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Banfield | Independiente Rivadavia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Independiente Rivadavia is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Banfield · 2.4 pts / match - Independiente Rivadavia
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Independiente Rivadavia is 64% better for: goals scored per match.
1.08 goals / match - Banfield · 1.77 goals / match - Independiente Rivadavia
Independiente Rivadavia is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.31 goals / match - Banfield · 1 goals / match - Independiente Rivadavia
Banfield scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Independiente Rivadavia keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).
Independiente Rivadavia scores in 92% of matches (12 of 13 matches), while Banfield keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Banfield
Over / Under - Independiente Rivadavia
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Independiente Rivadavia is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.08 pts / match - Banfield · 1.54 pts / match - Independiente Rivadavia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Banfield - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Independiente Rivadavia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 69%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Banfield
Independiente Rivadavia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Banfield | Liga | Independiente Rivadavia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.38 | 2.03 | ▲ 2.77 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 46% | 44% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 46% | 34% | ▲ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 35% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 69% | 60% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 77% | 70% | ▲ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Banfield 1 - 1 - 0 Independiente Rivadavia. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Banfield vs Independiente Rivadavia?
The Primera División match finished Banfield 0:0 Independiente Rivadavia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Banfield and Independiente Rivadavia?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Banfield won 1, Independiente Rivadavia won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Banfield vs Independiente Rivadavia?
Banfield score 1.08 goals per game on average and Independiente Rivadavia 1.77. The Primera División average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Banfield's matches and 69% of Independiente Rivadavia's.
What form are Banfield and Independiente Rivadavia in?
Over the last 5 games Banfield have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Independiente Rivadavia 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Banfield vs Independiente Rivadavia?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


