Argentina - Primera DivisiónData current as of 18 July 2026

Banfield vs Tigre: match statistics

Banfield crest
Banfield
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Tigre crest
Tigre
135%(2.75)
X40%(2.90)
225%(2.70)

Statistical analysis indicates a closely contested match with a slight edge for a draw. Banfield displays solid home form with a 50% win rate and a positive goal difference (+3) at their own stadium; however, their last five overall matches show weaker performance (1.2 points per game). Tigre boasts a better seasonal record (4 wins, 5 draws) and a higher shot conversion rate (13%), but they play cautiously away, drawing half of their matches and averaging just 0.8 points per game in their last five outings. Both teams are characterized by similar goal averages (2.5 goals per match) and xG, suggesting tactical balance. Considering Tigre's draw-oriented form (4 of their last 5 matches ended in draws) and Banfield's home effectiveness, the most likely scenario is a share of the points.

Banfield vs Tigre: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Banfield play Tigre in Primera División (Argentina). The match date is 21 March 2026 at 01:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Banfield: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Tigre: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Banfield scores 1.06 and concedes 1.19 goals per match. Tigre scores 1.13 and concedes 0.94. League average: 2.08 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Banfield 50%, Tigre 56%. Over 2.5: Banfield 44%, Tigre 25%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Tigre has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.37. Banfield: 11.9 shots per match, Tigre: 13.9.

Match halves

Banfield: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.69. Tigre: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

Banfield: 46-60 (4 goals). Tigre: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.08 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 2-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates a closely contested match with a slight edge for a draw. Banfield displays solid home form with a 50% win rate and a positive goal difference (+3) at their own stadium; however, their last five overall matches show weaker performance (1.2 points per game). Tigre boasts a better seasonal record (4 wins, 5 draws) and a higher shot conversion rate (13%), but they play cautiously away, drawing half of their matches and averaging just 0.8 points per game in their last five outings. Both teams are characterized by similar goal averages (2.5 goals per match) and xG, suggesting tactical balance. Considering Tigre's draw-oriented form (4 of their last 5 matches ended in draws) and Banfield's home effectiveness, the most likely scenario is a share of the points.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

28Possession (%)72
BanfieldTigre
12Shots22
BanfieldTigre
5Shots on target4
BanfieldTigre
1.27xG2.18
BanfieldTigre
3Corners7
BanfieldTigre
23Dangerous attacks72
BanfieldTigre
12Fouls10
BanfieldTigre
4Cards3
BanfieldTigre

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.06Goals scored / match1.13
BanfieldTigre
1.19Goals conceded / match0.94
BanfieldTigre
41%Average possession47%
BanfieldTigre
3.63Shots on target / match4.38
BanfieldTigre

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.94Shots per match13.88
BanfieldTigre
3.63Shots on target4.38
BanfieldTigre
8.9%Shot conversion8.1%
BanfieldTigre
41%Possession47%
BanfieldTigre
1.37xG for1.57
BanfieldTigre
1.85xG against1.23
BanfieldTigre

Shooting quality

Banfield: BalancedTigre: Balanced
BanfieldTigre
Accuracy (shots on target)30%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Banfield is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Banfield · 0.6 pts / match - Tigre

Banfield
LLDDW
Season result split
31% W19% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-8
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.94BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Tigre
LDDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
25% W50% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-8-4
1.25 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-3
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tigre is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

1.06 goals / match - Banfield · 1.13 goals / match - Tigre

Tigre is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.19 goals / match - Banfield · 0.94 goals / match - Tigre

Banfield scoring profile: strong

Banfield scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Tigre keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).

Tigre scoring profile: strong

Tigre scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Banfield keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).

17Goals scored (season)18
BanfieldTigre
19Goals conceded (season)15
BanfieldTigre
2.25Average goals in match2.06
BanfieldTigre
5Goals scored (last 5)2
BanfieldTigre
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
BanfieldTigre

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal69%
BanfieldTigre
31%2 goals25%
BanfieldTigre
6%3 goals13%
BanfieldTigre
0%4 goals6%
BanfieldTigre

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
BanfieldTigre
31%2 goals19%
BanfieldTigre
13%3 goals0%
BanfieldTigre
0%4 goals0%
BanfieldTigre

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time6%
BanfieldTigre
6%BTTS in both halves0%
BanfieldTigre
19%Scored in both halves19%
BanfieldTigre

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
BanfieldTigre
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
BanfieldTigre
60%BTTS - last 540%
BanfieldTigre

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
BanfieldTigre
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
BanfieldTigre
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
BanfieldTigre

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
BanfieldTigre
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
BanfieldTigre
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
BanfieldTigre

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tigre is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.06 pts / match - Banfield · 1.31 pts / match - Tigre

Banfield - half-time state
19% leading50% draw31% trailing
Tigre - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.06Points per match (1st half)1.31
BanfieldTigre
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.44
BanfieldTigre
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
BanfieldTigre
1Average goals (1st half)0.81
BanfieldTigre
56%Clean sheet before half-time69%
BanfieldTigre
63%No goal before half-time63%
BanfieldTigre

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.44
BanfieldTigre
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
BanfieldTigre
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
BanfieldTigre
1.25Average goals (2nd half)1.25
BanfieldTigre
56%Clean sheet after half-time50%
BanfieldTigre
50%No goal after half-time50%
BanfieldTigre

Banfield - second-half results

31% W44% R25% P
17
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding163%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tigre - second-half results

31% W50% R19% P
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding81%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 25%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Banfield - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Tigre - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Banfield
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
4
16-30
3
3
31-45
4
4
46-60
3
2
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Tigre
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
2
2
31-45
4
3
46-60
4
2
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.16
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-54%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Banfield

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.66
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
132%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Tigre

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

BanfieldLigaTigre
Average goals in match 2.252.08 2.06
Both teams scored 50%45% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%34% 25%
Clean sheets 25%34% 25%
Goal before half-time 63%61% 63%
Goal after half-time 75%71% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.08
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.18
Home goals / match
0.90
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Banfield 2 - 0 - 1 Tigre. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

CA Banfield
1 : 0
CA Tigre
CA Tigre
1 : 0
CA Banfield
CA Tigre
0 : 1
CA Banfield

FAQ

What was the result of Banfield vs Tigre?

The Primera División match finished Banfield 1:0 Tigre. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Banfield and Tigre?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Banfield won 2, Tigre won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Banfield vs Tigre?

Banfield score 1.06 goals per game on average and Tigre 1.13. The Primera División average is 2.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Banfield's matches and 56% of Tigre's.

What form are Banfield and Tigre in?

Over the last 5 games Banfield have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Tigre 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Banfield vs Tigre?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Banfield vs Tigre: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.