Lithuania - A LygaData current as of 06 September 2026

Banga vs Panevėžys: match statistics

Banga crest
Banga
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Panevėžys crest
Panevėžys
165%(2.20)
X20%(3.20)
215%(2.87)

Banga demonstrates a clear advantage as the home side, winning 50% of their home matches and boasting an impressive goal difference of +4 while conceding just 0.5 goals per game at home. Panevėžys is in terrible away form – they have lost all away matches this season, conceding an average of 4 goals per game with a goal difference of -7. The difference in efficiency is huge: Banga scores an average of 2.5 goals per home game with a conversion rate of 22%, while Panevėžys manages only 0.5 goals per away game with a mere 8% conversion. xG statistics also confirm the home team's dominance (1.38 vs 0.88), and Panevėžys' recent away form (two consecutive defeats) further weakens their chances. Given such a clear disparity in form, especially in the context of home and away performances, a Banga victory is the most likely scenario.

Banga vs Panevėžys: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Banga played Panevėžys in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match was played on 21 March 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Banga: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Panevėžys: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Banga scores 1.40 and concedes 0.60 goals per match. Panevėžys scores 0.80 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.41 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Banga 0%, Panevėžys 60%. Over 2.5: Banga 20%, Panevėžys 60%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 41%.

xG, shots and style

Banga has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.25. Banga: 11.8 shots per match, Panevėžys: 10.8.

Match halves

Banga: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60. Panevėžys: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

Banga: 16-30 (3 goals). Panevėžys: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

A Lyga: 2.41 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 41%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 0-3-1. Average goals 2.25, BTTS 75%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Banga demonstrates a clear advantage as the home side, winning 50% of their home matches and boasting an impressive goal difference of +4 while conceding just 0.5 goals per game at home. Panevėžys is in terrible away form – they have lost all away matches this season, conceding an average of 4 goals per game with a goal difference of -7. The difference in efficiency is huge: Banga scores an average of 2.5 goals per home game with a conversion rate of 22%, while Panevėžys manages only 0.5 goals per away game with a mere 8% conversion. xG statistics also confirm the home team's dominance (1.38 vs 0.88), and Panevėžys' recent away form (two consecutive defeats) further weakens their chances. Given such a clear disparity in form, especially in the context of home and away performances, a Banga victory is the most likely scenario.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
BangaPanevėžys
14Shots11
BangaPanevėžys
4Shots on target3
BangaPanevėžys
1.41xG1.17
BangaPanevėžys
5Corners1
BangaPanevėžys
34Dangerous attacks38
BangaPanevėžys
21Fouls11
BangaPanevėžys
3Cards4
BangaPanevėžys

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.4Goals scored / match0.8
BangaPanevėžys
0.6Goals conceded / match2
BangaPanevėžys
46%Average possession48%
BangaPanevėžys
3.8Shots on target / match4.2
BangaPanevėžys

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.8Shots per match10.8
BangaPanevėžys
3.8Shots on target4.2
BangaPanevėžys
11.9%Shot conversion7.4%
BangaPanevėžys
46%Possession48%
BangaPanevėžys
1.32xG for1.25
BangaPanevėžys
1.11xG against1.78
BangaPanevėžys

Shooting quality

Banga: BalancedPanevėžys: Balanced
BangaPanevėžys
Accuracy (shots on target)32%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.19

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Banga is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Banga · 1 pts / match - Panevėžys

Banga
WLWLL
Season result split
40% W0% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%
Panevėžys
DLDLW
Season result split
20% W40% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Banga is 75% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - Banga · 0.8 goals / match - Panevėžys

Banga is 233% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.6 goals / match - Banga · 2 goals / match - Panevėžys

Banga scoring profile: mixed

Banga scores in 40% of matches (2 of 5 matches), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

Panevėžys scoring profile: mixed

Panevėžys scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Banga keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

7Goals scored (season)4
BangaPanevėžys
3Goals conceded (season)10
BangaPanevėžys
2Average goals in match2.8
BangaPanevėžys
7Goals scored (last 5)4
BangaPanevėžys
3Goals conceded (last 5)10
BangaPanevėžys

How often they score at least...

40%1 goal60%
BangaPanevėžys
40%2 goals20%
BangaPanevėžys
20%3 goals0%
BangaPanevėžys
20%4 goals0%
BangaPanevėžys

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal80%
BangaPanevėžys
0%2 goals40%
BangaPanevėžys
0%3 goals40%
BangaPanevėžys
0%4 goals40%
BangaPanevėžys

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time40%
BangaPanevėžys
0%BTTS in both halves0%
BangaPanevėžys
20%Scored in both halves0%
BangaPanevėžys

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
BangaPanevėžys
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
BangaPanevėžys
0%BTTS - last 560%
BangaPanevėžys

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
BangaPanevėžys
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time60%
BangaPanevėžys
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time40%
BangaPanevėžys

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
BangaPanevėžys
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
BangaPanevėžys
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
BangaPanevėžys

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Panevėžys is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / match - Banga · 1.6 pts / match - Panevėžys

Banga - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing
Panevėžys - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per match (1st half)1.6
BangaPanevėžys
0.8Goals scored (1st half)0.8
BangaPanevėžys
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)1
BangaPanevėžys
1Average goals (1st half)1.8
BangaPanevėžys
80%Clean sheet before half-time40%
BangaPanevėžys
80%No goal before half-time40%
BangaPanevėžys

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)0.4
BangaPanevėžys
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0
BangaPanevėžys
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)1
BangaPanevėžys
1Average goals (2nd half)1
BangaPanevėžys
60%Clean sheet after half-time40%
BangaPanevėžys
60%No goal after half-time100%
BangaPanevėžys

Banga - second-half results

40% W20% R40% P
6
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Panevėžys - second-half results

0% W40% R60% P
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Banga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Panevėžys - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.40
Goals scored / match0.80.0
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference-1-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Banga
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
3
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
2
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Panevėžys
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
3
1
16-30
1
3
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.40
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
30%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
24%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
24%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Banga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
54%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Panevėžys

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.67
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
154%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.8
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

BangaLigaPanevėžys
Average goals in match 2.002.41 2.80
Both teams scored 0%44% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 20%41% 60%
Clean sheets 40%33% 20%
Goal before half-time 40%70% 80%
Goal after half-time 80%70% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.41
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
1.11
Away goals / match
+17%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. BangaYellow cardDovydas Norvilas
  2. PanevėžysYellow cardLovro Grajfoner
  3. PanevėžysYellow cardOleksandr Kurtsev
  4. BangaYellow cardDeividas Malžinskas
  5. PanevėžysYellow cardKwadwo Asamoah
  6. BangaYellow cardKofi Fosuhene Asare
  7. PanevėžysGoalKwadwo Asamoah
  8. PanevėžysSubstitutionOn: Marko BačaninOff: Edvin Muratovic
  9. PanevėžysYellow cardOleksandr Kurtsev

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Banga 0 - 3 - 1 Panevėžys. Average goals 2.25, both teams scored in 75% matches.

FK Banga Gargždai
2 : 2
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
1 : 0
FK Banga Gargždai
FK Banga Gargždai
1 : 1
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
1 : 1
FK Banga Gargždai

FAQ

What was the result of Banga vs Panevėžys?

The A Lyga match finished Banga 0:1 Panevėžys. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Banga and Panevėžys?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Banga won 0, Panevėžys won 1 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Banga vs Panevėžys?

Banga score 1.40 goals per game on average and Panevėžys 0.80. The A Lyga average is 2.41 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Banga's matches and 60% of Panevėžys's.

What form are Banga and Panevėžys in?

Over the last 5 games Banga have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Panevėžys 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Banga vs Panevėžys?

The statistical background for Banga vs Panevėžys — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.