Bangor vs Cliftonville: match statistics
Bangor vs Cliftonville: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Bangor played Cliftonville in NIFL Premiership (Northern Ireland). The match was played on 20 December 2025. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Bangor: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Cliftonville: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Bangor scores 1.26 and concedes 1.53 goals per match. Cliftonville scores 1.53 and concedes 1.24. League average: 2.76 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Bangor 58%, Cliftonville 59%. Over 2.5: Bangor 58%, Cliftonville 53%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Cliftonville has higher xG: 1.36 vs 1.20. Bangor: 8.6 shots per match, Cliftonville: 11.3.
Match halves
Bangor: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.63. Cliftonville: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Bangor: 31-45+ (8 goals). Cliftonville: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NIFL Premiership: 2.76 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Bangor | Cliftonville | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Cliftonville is 160% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Bangor · 2.6 pts / match - Cliftonville
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cliftonville is 21% better for: goals scored per match.
1.26 goals / match - Bangor · 1.53 goals / match - Cliftonville
Cliftonville is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.53 goals / match - Bangor · 1.24 goals / match - Cliftonville
Bangor scores in 63% of matches (12 of 19 matches), while Cliftonville keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).
Cliftonville scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Bangor keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bangor
Over / Under - Cliftonville
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Bangor is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.42 pts / match - Bangor · 1.29 pts / match - Cliftonville
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bangor - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Cliftonville - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Bangor
Cliftonville
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NIFL Premiership).
Teams vs league
| Bangor | Liga | Cliftonville | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.79 | 2.76 | • 2.76 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 48% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 58% | 53% | • 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 5% | 27% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 74% | 76% | • 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 79% | ▼ 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Bangor 1 - 0 - 0 Cliftonville. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Bangor vs Cliftonville?
The NIFL Premiership match finished Bangor 1:1 Cliftonville. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Bangor vs Cliftonville?
Bangor score 1.26 goals per game on average and Cliftonville 1.53. The NIFL Premiership average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Bangor's matches and 59% of Cliftonville's.
What form are Bangor and Cliftonville in?
Over the last 5 games Bangor have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Cliftonville 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bangor vs Cliftonville?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.