Be'sat Kermanshah vs Pars Jam Bushehr: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Be'sat Kermanshah vs Pars Jam Bushehr: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Be'sat Kermanshah play Pars Jam Bushehr in Azadegan League (Iran). The match date is 20 October 2026.
Current form
Be'sat Kermanshah: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Pars Jam Bushehr: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Be'sat Kermanshah scores 1.20 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. Pars Jam Bushehr scores 1.00 and concedes 0.40. League average: 1.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Be'sat Kermanshah 40%, Pars Jam Bushehr 20%. Over 2.5: Be'sat Kermanshah 60%, Pars Jam Bushehr 20%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 23%.
xG, shots and style
xG is very similar for both teams. Be'sat Kermanshah: -1.0 shots per match, Pars Jam Bushehr: -1.0.
Match halves
Be'sat Kermanshah: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60. Pars Jam Bushehr: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.40.
Goals by minute
Be'sat Kermanshah: 0-15 (2 goals). Pars Jam Bushehr: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Azadegan League: 1.58 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 23%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Be'sat Kermanshah | Pars Jam Bushehr | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 0% | 0% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Pars Jam Bushehr is 57% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Be'sat Kermanshah · 2.2 pts / match - Pars Jam Bushehr
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Be'sat Kermanshah is 20% better for: goals scored per match.
1.2 goals / match - Be'sat Kermanshah · 1 goals / match - Pars Jam Bushehr
Pars Jam Bushehr is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.8 goals / match - Be'sat Kermanshah · 0.4 goals / match - Pars Jam Bushehr
Be'sat Kermanshah scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Pars Jam Bushehr keeps a clean sheet in 80% (4 of 5 matches).
Pars Jam Bushehr scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Be'sat Kermanshah keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Be'sat Kermanshah
Over / Under - Pars Jam Bushehr
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pars Jam Bushehr is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / match - Be'sat Kermanshah · 1.8 pts / match - Pars Jam Bushehr
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Be'sat Kermanshah - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Pars Jam Bushehr - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Be'sat Kermanshah
Pars Jam Bushehr
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Be'sat Kermanshah | Liga | Pars Jam Bushehr | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.00 | 1.58 | ▼ 1.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 40% | 30% | ▼ 20% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 23% | ▼ 20% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 40% | 45% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 40% | 45% | ▼ 40% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 40% | 53% | ▼ 40% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Be'sat Kermanshah 0 - 1 - 1 Pars Jam Bushehr. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
When do Be'sat Kermanshah and Pars Jam Bushehr play?
Be'sat Kermanshah face Pars Jam Bushehr on 20 October 2026 in Azadegan League. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Be'sat Kermanshah and Pars Jam Bushehr?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Be'sat Kermanshah won 0, Pars Jam Bushehr won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Be'sat Kermanshah vs Pars Jam Bushehr?
Be'sat Kermanshah score 1.20 goals per game on average and Pars Jam Bushehr 1.00. The Azadegan League average is 1.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 23% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Be'sat Kermanshah's matches and 20% of Pars Jam Bushehr's.
What form are Be'sat Kermanshah and Pars Jam Bushehr in?
Over the last 5 games Be'sat Kermanshah have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Pars Jam Bushehr 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Be'sat Kermanshah vs Pars Jam Bushehr?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.