Beerschot-Wilrijk vs Olympic Charleroi: match statistics
Beerschot-Wilrijk occupies a significantly higher position in the table (4th) compared to Olympic Charleroi (16th), indicating their superior quality this season. The hosts boast a better home goal difference (+4) and a higher win percentage at home (44%), while the visitors win only 25% of their away matches. Charleroi displays a weak defence on the road, conceding an average of 1.88 goals per match, which could be exploited by the hosts who have an advantage in possession (57%). Although Beerschot is on a poor run of form in their last five matches (0 points), their home statistics remain solid, and their xG advantage (1.71 vs 1.46) suggests efficiency in creating chances. Charleroi shows better recent form (1.2 PPG), however, their defensive issues and high percentage of draws away from home (50%) make the draw the second most likely outcome.
Beerschot-Wilrijk vs Olympic Charleroi: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Beerschot-Wilrijk played Olympic Charleroi in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 18 January 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Beerschot-Wilrijk: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Olympic Charleroi: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Beerschot-Wilrijk scores 1.56 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. Olympic Charleroi scores 0.89 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.76 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Beerschot-Wilrijk 61%, Olympic Charleroi 50%. Over 2.5: Beerschot-Wilrijk 50%, Olympic Charleroi 56%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Beerschot-Wilrijk has higher xG: 1.75 vs 1.38. Beerschot-Wilrijk: 15.3 shots per match, Olympic Charleroi: 11.4.
Match halves
Beerschot-Wilrijk: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.17. Olympic Charleroi: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Beerschot-Wilrijk: 76-90+ (11 goals). Olympic Charleroi: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division B: 2.76 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Beerschot-Wilrijk occupies a significantly higher position in the table (4th) compared to Olympic Charleroi (16th), indicating their superior quality this season. The hosts boast a better home goal difference (+4) and a higher win percentage at home (44%), while the visitors win only 25% of their away matches. Charleroi displays a weak defence on the road, conceding an average of 1.88 goals per match, which could be exploited by the hosts who have an advantage in possession (57%). Although Beerschot is on a poor run of form in their last five matches (0 points), their home statistics remain solid, and their xG advantage (1.71 vs 1.46) suggests efficiency in creating chances. Charleroi shows better recent form (1.2 PPG), however, their defensive issues and high percentage of draws away from home (50%) make the draw the second most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Beerschot-Wilrijk | Olympic Charleroi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Olympic Charleroi is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Beerschot-Wilrijk · 1.2 pts / match - Olympic Charleroi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Beerschot-Wilrijk is 75% better for: goals scored per match.
1.56 goals / match - Beerschot-Wilrijk · 0.89 goals / match - Olympic Charleroi
Beerschot-Wilrijk is 80% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.11 goals / match - Beerschot-Wilrijk · 2 goals / match - Olympic Charleroi
Beerschot-Wilrijk scores in 94% of matches (17 of 18 matches), while Olympic Charleroi keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 matches).
Olympic Charleroi scores in 56% of matches (10 of 18 matches), while Beerschot-Wilrijk keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Beerschot-Wilrijk
Over / Under - Olympic Charleroi
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Beerschot-Wilrijk is 73% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.44 pts / match - Beerschot-Wilrijk · 0.83 pts / match - Olympic Charleroi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Beerschot-Wilrijk - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Olympic Charleroi - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Beerschot-Wilrijk
Olympic Charleroi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| Beerschot-Wilrijk | Liga | Olympic Charleroi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.67 | 2.76 | ▲ 2.89 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 54% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 50% | 51% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 26% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 73% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 94% | 78% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Beerschot-Wilrijk 1 - 0 - 0 Olympic Charleroi. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Beerschot-Wilrijk vs Olympic Charleroi?
The First Division B match finished Beerschot-Wilrijk 2:1 Olympic Charleroi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Beerschot-Wilrijk vs Olympic Charleroi?
Beerschot-Wilrijk score 1.56 goals per game on average and Olympic Charleroi 0.89. The First Division B average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Beerschot-Wilrijk's matches and 50% of Olympic Charleroi's.
What form are Beerschot-Wilrijk and Olympic Charleroi in?
Over the last 5 games Beerschot-Wilrijk have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Olympic Charleroi 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Beerschot-Wilrijk vs Olympic Charleroi?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Beerschot-Wilrijk vs Olympic Charleroi: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.