Beerschot-Wilrijk vs Patro Eisden: match statistics
Beerschot-Wilrijk vs Patro Eisden: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Beerschot-Wilrijk played Patro Eisden in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 13 December 2025. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Beerschot-Wilrijk: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Patro Eisden: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Beerschot-Wilrijk scores 1.67 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. Patro Eisden scores 1.20 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Beerschot-Wilrijk 60%, Patro Eisden 47%. Over 2.5: Beerschot-Wilrijk 47%, Patro Eisden 47%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Beerschot-Wilrijk has higher xG: 1.86 vs 1.69. Beerschot-Wilrijk: 16.3 shots per match, Patro Eisden: 15.9.
Match halves
Beerschot-Wilrijk: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.33. Patro Eisden: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Beerschot-Wilrijk: 76-90+ (11 goals). Patro Eisden: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division B: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Beerschot-Wilrijk | Patro Eisden | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Beerschot-Wilrijk is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Beerschot-Wilrijk · 1.6 pts / match - Patro Eisden
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Beerschot-Wilrijk is 39% better for: goals scored per match.
1.67 goals / match - Beerschot-Wilrijk · 1.2 goals / match - Patro Eisden
Beerschot-Wilrijk is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.8 goals / match - Beerschot-Wilrijk · 1 goals / match - Patro Eisden
Beerschot-Wilrijk scores in 100% of matches (15 of 15 matches), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).
Patro Eisden scores in 60% of matches (9 of 15 matches), while Beerschot-Wilrijk keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Beerschot-Wilrijk
Over / Under - Patro Eisden
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Beerschot-Wilrijk is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / match - Beerschot-Wilrijk · 1.27 pts / match - Patro Eisden
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Beerschot-Wilrijk - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Patro Eisden - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Beerschot-Wilrijk
Patro Eisden
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| Beerschot-Wilrijk | Liga | Patro Eisden | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.47 | 2.71 | ▼ 2.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 53% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 50% | ▼ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 27% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 74% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 78% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Beerschot-Wilrijk vs Patro Eisden?
The First Division B match finished Beerschot-Wilrijk 0:2 Patro Eisden. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Beerschot-Wilrijk vs Patro Eisden?
Beerschot-Wilrijk score 1.67 goals per game on average and Patro Eisden 1.20. The First Division B average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Beerschot-Wilrijk's matches and 47% of Patro Eisden's.
What form are Beerschot-Wilrijk and Patro Eisden in?
Over the last 5 games Beerschot-Wilrijk have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Patro Eisden 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Beerschot-Wilrijk vs Patro Eisden?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.