Beitar Jerusalem vs Hapoel Katamon: match statistics
Beitar Jerusalem vs Hapoel Katamon: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Beitar Jerusalem played Hapoel Katamon in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The match was played on 8 December 2025. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Beitar Jerusalem: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Hapoel Katamon: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Beitar Jerusalem scores 2.67 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Hapoel Katamon scores 0.83 and concedes 1.58. League average: 3.20 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Beitar Jerusalem 67%, Hapoel Katamon 67%. Over 2.5: Beitar Jerusalem 75%, Hapoel Katamon 67%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 62%.
xG, shots and style
Beitar Jerusalem has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.25. Beitar Jerusalem: 13.1 shots per match, Hapoel Katamon: 10.0.
Match halves
Beitar Jerusalem: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.83. Hapoel Katamon: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Beitar Jerusalem: 76-90+ (12 goals). Hapoel Katamon: 61-75 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Israeli Premier League: 3.20 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 62%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Beitar Jerusalem | Hapoel Katamon | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.48 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Beitar Jerusalem is 100% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Beitar Jerusalem · 1.2 pts / match - Hapoel Katamon
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Beitar Jerusalem is 222% better for: goals scored per match.
2.67 goals / match - Beitar Jerusalem · 0.83 goals / match - Hapoel Katamon
Beitar Jerusalem is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.25 goals / match - Beitar Jerusalem · 1.58 goals / match - Hapoel Katamon
Beitar Jerusalem scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Hapoel Katamon keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).
Hapoel Katamon scores in 67% of matches (8 of 12 matches), while Beitar Jerusalem keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Beitar Jerusalem
Over / Under - Hapoel Katamon
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Beitar Jerusalem is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.42 pts / match - Beitar Jerusalem · 1.25 pts / match - Hapoel Katamon
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Beitar Jerusalem - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Hapoel Katamon - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 8%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 2.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 3.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +9 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Beitar Jerusalem
Hapoel Katamon
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Beitar Jerusalem | Liga | Hapoel Katamon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.92 | 3.20 | ▼ 2.42 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 62% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 62% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | • 25% | 24% | • 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 64% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 80% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Beitar Jerusalem vs Hapoel Katamon?
The Israeli Premier League match finished Beitar Jerusalem 1:1 Hapoel Katamon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Beitar Jerusalem vs Hapoel Katamon?
Beitar Jerusalem score 2.67 goals per game on average and Hapoel Katamon 0.83. The Israeli Premier League average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Beitar Jerusalem's matches and 67% of Hapoel Katamon's.
What form are Beitar Jerusalem and Hapoel Katamon in?
Over the last 5 games Beitar Jerusalem have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Hapoel Katamon 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Beitar Jerusalem vs Hapoel Katamon?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Beitar Jerusalem vs Hapoel Katamon: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.