Israel - Israeli Premier LeagueData current as of 19 September 2026

Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Petah Tikva: match statistics

Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Petah Tikva: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Beitar Jerusalem played Maccabi Petah Tikva in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The match was played on 15 September 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Beitar Jerusalem: 1-0-2, 1.00 points/match. Maccabi Petah Tikva: 2-0-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Beitar Jerusalem scores 0.67 and concedes 2.33 goals per match. Maccabi Petah Tikva scores 1.67 and concedes 1.33. League average: 3.11 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Beitar Jerusalem 33%, Maccabi Petah Tikva 100%. Over 2.5: Beitar Jerusalem 67%, Maccabi Petah Tikva 100%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Beitar Jerusalem: 11.0 shots per match, Maccabi Petah Tikva: 18.3.

Match halves

Beitar Jerusalem: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.67. Maccabi Petah Tikva: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Beitar Jerusalem: 46-60 (1 goals). Maccabi Petah Tikva: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Israeli Premier League: 3.11 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Maccabi Petah Tikva sit 3rd, while Beitar Jerusalem are only 12th, and the gap is also reflected in their recent form: the visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches, compared with just 2 wins for the hosts. Beitar lost their only home match so far, conceding as many as 4 goals while scoring just 1, whereas Maccabi won their away fixture and scored 2 goals. The visitors are clearly more clinical, converting 17% of their shots into goals compared with Beitar’s 8%, while also averaging 5 shots on target away from home versus 3 for the hosts. Although Beitar average 73% possession at home, this does not translate into higher-quality chances, as their average xG stands at 1.34 compared with Maccabi’s 1.51. The hosts’ vulnerable defence, which has conceded 11 goals in their last 5 matches, should allow the in-form visitors to gain the upper hand.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for BTTS - Yes is clear, as both teams have recorded goals from both sides in 100% of their matches so far, and neither has kept a clean sheet. Beitar averages 1.5 goals scored and 1.5 conceded, while Maccabi Petah Tikva scores 2.0 goals per match and concedes just 1.0, which supports the expectation of an away goal followed by a response from the hosts. In their last five matches, Beitar allowed opponents to score 2.2 goals per game, while Maccabi averaged 2.0 goals during the same period. The hosts also create plenty of chances, averaging 21.5 shots and 7.0 shots on target per match, while Maccabi's xG stands at 1.61, giving both attacks a solid foundation to find the net. The latest BTTS form—60% for Beitar and 80% for Maccabi—also exceeds or confirms the league average of 62%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams exceeded the 1.5-goal line in 100% of their matches so far, and in every game they both scored and conceded at least one goal. Beitar conceded an average of 2.2 goals in their last five appearances, while Maccabi Petah Tikva scored 2.0 goals per match over the same period. Their attacking potential is also supported by recent xG figures: 1.60 for the hosts and 1.61 for the visitors, compared with 1.52 and 1.39 xG allowed by their opponents, respectively. The Over 2.5 line also has merit, having landed in 80% of Beitar’s last five matches and 100% of Maccabi’s games; however, Over 1.5 is clearly the safer choice with a projected 3.05 goals. This option is favored due to the high consistency of both attacks and the absence of a clean sheet on either side.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Maccabi Petah Tikva win at full-time, as the visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 2.0 goals while conceding only 1.0. Over the same period, Beitar have conceded as many as 2.2 goals per match and have allowed opponents to score an average of 1.8 goals after the break, clearly increasing the visitors’ chances of completing a turnaround late in the game. Maccabi were level at half-time in 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with 2 of 5 for Beitar, while both teams averaged just 0.6 goals scored in the first half. The visitors’ advantage is particularly evident after the interval: they won the second half in 60% of their recent appearances and scored an average of 1.4 goals in that period, compared with Beitar’s 0.8. Although the hosts attempt more shots, 21.5 compared with 12.0, their conversion rate is only 7%, whereas Maccabi convert 17% of their attempts, supporting the HT/FT X/2 scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

67Possession (%)33
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
27Shots11
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
6Shots on target5
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
3xG1.49
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
10Corners2
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
121Dangerous attacks60
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
11Fouls17
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
1Cards0
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
0.67Goals scored / match1.67
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
2.33Goals conceded / match1.33
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
62%Average possession49%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
3.67Shots on target / match6.33
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match18.33
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
3.67Shots on target6.33
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
6.1%Shot conversion9.1%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
62%Possession49%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
1.38xG for1.37
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
1.75xG against1.54
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva

Shooting quality

Beitar Jerusalem: BalancedMaccabi Petah Tikva: Attacking
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
Accuracy (shots on target)33%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.07
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.180.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Maccabi Petah Tikva is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Beitar Jerusalem · 2 pts / match - Maccabi Petah Tikva

Beitar Jerusalem
LLW
Season result split
33% W0% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.7Goals conceded: 2.3xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 67%
Maccabi Petah Tikva
WWL
Season result split
67% W0% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.7Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Maccabi Petah Tikva is 149% better for: goals scored per match.

0.67 goals / match - Beitar Jerusalem · 1.67 goals / match - Maccabi Petah Tikva

Maccabi Petah Tikva is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.33 goals / match - Beitar Jerusalem · 1.33 goals / match - Maccabi Petah Tikva

Beitar Jerusalem scoring profile: very strong

Beitar Jerusalem scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while Maccabi Petah Tikva keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

Maccabi Petah Tikva scoring profile: very strong

Maccabi Petah Tikva scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Beitar Jerusalem keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

2Goals scored (season)5
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
7Goals conceded (season)4
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
3Average goals in match3
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
2Goals scored (last 5)5
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal100%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
0%2 goals67%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
0%3 goals0%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
0%4 goals0%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal100%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
67%2 goals33%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
67%3 goals0%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
33%4 goals0%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

100%
Maccabi Petah Tikva - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.3 of 3 matches
59%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time33%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
0%Scored in both halves33%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
33%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
33%BTTS - last 5100%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva

1st half

33%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Maccabi Petah Tikva is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.67 pts / match - Beitar Jerusalem · 1.33 pts / match - Maccabi Petah Tikva

Beitar Jerusalem - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing
Maccabi Petah Tikva - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.67Points per match (1st half)1.33
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
0Goals scored (1st half)1
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
0.33Average goals (1st half)1.67
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
67%Clean sheet before half-time33%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
100%No goal before half-time33%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.33
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
2.67Average goals (2nd half)1.33
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
33%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva
33%No goal after half-time33%
Beitar JerusalemMaccabi Petah Tikva

Beitar Jerusalem - second-half results

33% W0% D67% L
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+1.7

Concedes 1.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Maccabi Petah Tikva - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
4
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Beitar Jerusalem - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.671.00
Goals scored / match0.00.7
Goals conceded / match0.32.0
Average goals in match0.32.7
1 goal33%100%
2 goals0%67%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet67%33%
No goal100%33%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 67% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 0% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Maccabi Petah Tikva - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.331.33
Goals scored / match1.00.7
Goals conceded / match0.70.7
Average goals in match1.71.3
1 goal100%100%
2 goals67%33%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet33%33%
No goal33%33%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 33% leading - 33% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 33% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Beitar Jerusalem
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Maccabi Petah Tikva
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Beitar Jerusalem

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.71
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.58
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
40%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
162%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Maccabi Petah Tikva

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).

Teams vs league

Beitar JerusalemLigaMaccabi Petah Tikva
Average goals in match 3.003.11 3.00
Both teams scored 33%59% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%67% 100%
Clean sheets 33%24% 0%
Goal before half-time 33%67% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%81% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.11
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.44
Away goals / match
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
33%
3 goals
15%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Beitar JerusalemGoalShon Zalman WeissmanAssist: Tomer Yosefi
  2. Beitar JerusalemGoalOmer AtziliAssist: Tomer Yosefi
  3. Beitar JerusalemYellow cardBoris Enow Takang
  4. Beitar JerusalemSubstitutionOn: Yarden ShuaOff: Eugene Ansah
  5. Maccabi Petah TikvaSubstitutionOn: Yoav KorenOff: Marko Rakonjac
  6. Beitar JerusalemGoalJohnbosco Samuel KaluAssist: Yarden Shua
  7. Maccabi Petah TikvaGoalYoav KorenAssist: José Ricardo Cortés

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Petah Tikva?

The Israeli Premier League match finished Beitar Jerusalem 3:1 Maccabi Petah Tikva. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Petah Tikva?

Beitar Jerusalem score 0.67 goals per game on average and Maccabi Petah Tikva 1.67. The Israeli Premier League average is 3.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Beitar Jerusalem's matches and 100% of Maccabi Petah Tikva's.

What form are Beitar Jerusalem and Maccabi Petah Tikva in?

Over the last 5 games Beitar Jerusalem have a 1-0-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Maccabi Petah Tikva 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Petah Tikva?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Petah Tikva: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.