Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Tel Aviv: match statistics
Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Tel Aviv: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Beitar Jerusalem played Maccabi Tel Aviv in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 4:2.
Current form
Beitar Jerusalem: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Maccabi Tel Aviv: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Beitar Jerusalem scores 2.38 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. Maccabi Tel Aviv scores 2.07 and concedes 1.14. League average: 2.98 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Beitar Jerusalem 69%, Maccabi Tel Aviv 62%. Over 2.5: Beitar Jerusalem 69%, Maccabi Tel Aviv 66%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Maccabi Tel Aviv has higher xG: 1.97 vs 1.87. Beitar Jerusalem: 16.1 shots per match, Maccabi Tel Aviv: 15.4.
Match halves
Beitar Jerusalem: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 1.52. Maccabi Tel Aviv: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 1.10.
Goals by minute
Beitar Jerusalem: 76-90+ (26 goals). Maccabi Tel Aviv: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Israeli Premier League: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Beitar Jerusalem are favorites: in their last 5 matches the hosts scored 14 goals (2.8 per match) and have a record of 4 wins and 1 draw, while Maccabi Tel Aviv scored 9 goals (1.8 per match) with 4 wins and 1 loss. The hosts conceded 4 goals in their last five games and concede 0.87 goals per home match on average, whereas the visitors conceded 6 goals in their last 5 and concede 0.93 on the road. Maccabi, however, have a better shot conversion away (13% vs 11%) and a higher average goals away (2.21 vs 1.80), and average xG are close: 1.98 for the visitors versus 1.92 for the hosts. Over the season Beitar have more wins (19 vs 17), fewer losses (3 vs 5) and more goals scored overall (69 vs 60), which together with recent form favors a home victory, although I expect a tight match.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have season BTTS rates of 67% (Beitar) and 57% (Maccabi); the average is 62%, above the league level of 56%. Season goal averages are 1.93 for Beitar and 2.21 for Maccabi (total 4.14) versus the league average 2.98, which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring in this match. xG confirms similar attacking potential: 1.96 xG for the home side versus 1.98 xG for the visitors, and xGA of 1.24 and 1.22 suggest both sides create and concede chances. Clean sheets occur in only 33% and 36% of matches, although in the last 5 games Beitar has a lower BTTS (40%) and concedes on average 0.8 goals, which slightly reduces confidence; nevertheless, based on season metrics and the high combined xG I tip BTTS - Yes at 65% probability (35% No).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams possess clear offensive potential: Beitar scores an average of 1.93 goals per match, Maccabi 2.21, with season xG of 1.96 and 1.98 respectively. After accounting for opponents’ defensive xG (xG conceded 1.24 for Beitar and 1.22 for Maccabi) we arrive at approximately 1.59 xG for the home side and 1.61 for the visitors, totaling ~3.20 expected goals. Season metrics confirm a high probability of goals: Over 1.5 occurred in 80% of Beitar’s matches and 79% of Maccabi’s, and Over 2.5 in 67% and 64% of cases, hence a strong signal for Over 1.5 (88%) and for Over 2.5 (70%). Over 3.5 is more uncertain — season rates 47% (Beitar) vs 57% (Maccabi), average ~52%, but expected 3.20 goals is below the 3.5 threshold, so Under 3.5 holds a slight edge (54%). Additionally, 67% of Beitar’s matches and 57% of Maccabi’s matches ended with both teams scoring, which reinforces the minimum-two-goals scenario and makes Over 1.5 the best line to play.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1). Maccabi averages 1.15 goals by half-time versus Beitar’s 0.67, and the teams’ xG are nearly identical (1.98 vs 1.96), which increases the probability of a draw after 45 minutes. However, after the break Beitar clearly dominates: the hosts score an average of 1.27 goals in the second half, at least one goal is scored after the interval in 93% of their matches, and in their last five fixtures they have won the second half in 80% of cases. Maccabi defends solidly (conceding 0.93 goals per match on the season versus Beitar’s 1.33), but this defensive edge does not offset the home side’s second-half advantage, as Beitar win second halves in 53% of matches. The combination of these figures (similar xG and higher Maccabi goals at half-time vs. Beitar’s strong second-half output) justifies selecting X/1 as the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Beitar Jerusalem | Maccabi Tel Aviv | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Beitar Jerusalem is 8% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Beitar Jerusalem · 2.4 pts / match - Maccabi Tel Aviv
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Beitar Jerusalem is 15% better for: goals scored per match.
2.38 goals / match - Beitar Jerusalem · 2.07 goals / match - Maccabi Tel Aviv
Beitar Jerusalem scores in 86% of matches (25 of 29 matches), while Maccabi Tel Aviv keeps a clean sheet in 34% (10 of 29 matches).
Maccabi Tel Aviv scores in 90% of matches (26 of 29 matches), while Beitar Jerusalem keeps a clean sheet in 28% (8 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Beitar Jerusalem
Over / Under - Maccabi Tel Aviv
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Maccabi Tel Aviv is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.55 pts / match - Beitar Jerusalem · 1.72 pts / match - Maccabi Tel Aviv
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Beitar Jerusalem - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 66%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Maccabi Tel Aviv - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (26 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +19 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Beitar Jerusalem
Maccabi Tel Aviv
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Beitar Jerusalem | Liga | Maccabi Tel Aviv | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.48 | 2.98 | ▲ 3.21 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 56% | ▲ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 69% | 57% | ▲ 66% |
| Clean sheets | • 28% | 27% | ▲ 34% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 65% | ▲ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 78% | • 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Beitar Jerusalem 1 - 1 - 0 Maccabi Tel Aviv. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Tel Aviv?
The Israeli Premier League match finished Beitar Jerusalem 4:2 Maccabi Tel Aviv. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Beitar Jerusalem and Maccabi Tel Aviv?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Beitar Jerusalem won 1, Maccabi Tel Aviv won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Tel Aviv?
Beitar Jerusalem score 2.38 goals per game on average and Maccabi Tel Aviv 2.07. The Israeli Premier League average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Beitar Jerusalem's matches and 62% of Maccabi Tel Aviv's.
What form are Beitar Jerusalem and Maccabi Tel Aviv in?
Over the last 5 games Beitar Jerusalem have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Maccabi Tel Aviv 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Tel Aviv?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


