Békéscsaba vs Karcag SE: match statistics
Békéscsaba vs Karcag SE: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Békéscsaba played Karcag SE in NB II (Hungary). The match was played on 26 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Békéscsaba: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Karcag SE: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Békéscsaba scores 0.96 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. Karcag SE scores 1.08 and concedes 1.42. League average: 2.53 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Békéscsaba 46%, Karcag SE 50%. Over 2.5: Békéscsaba 38%, Karcag SE 35%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Karcag SE has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.33. Békéscsaba: 10.6 shots per match, Karcag SE: 11.5.
Match halves
Békéscsaba: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.42. Karcag SE: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.73.
Goals by minute
Békéscsaba: 31-45+ (8 goals). Karcag SE: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NB II: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Karcag SE is the favorite for this match: they sit 9th in the table versus 14th Békéscsaba and have 9 wins this season compared to the home side’s 5. In the last 5 matches Karcag won 2 times and scored 6 goals, averaging 1.2 points per match, while Békéscsaba has not won in their last 5, scoring only 2 goals and averaging 0.4 points per match. Although Békéscsaba creates more opportunities (11.15 shots and 3.31 on target per match, possession 49% vs 42%), they have an average home xG of 1.34 but convert that into just 0.77 goals per match, featuring a low conversion rate of 7% and 54% of matches without a goal. Karcag, despite fewer shots (9 per match and 2.69 on target), are more efficient (conversion 9%, rate of matches without a goal 38%); defensively the visitors concede 1.54 goals on average away versus 1.15 for the hosts, and xG against is 1.37 for the hosts versus 1.64 for the visitors. Considering the higher finishing efficiency (6 goals in the last 5 vs 2) and the superior win tally this season, I assign Karcag a higher probability to win (50%) than a draw (30%) or a home victory (20%).
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - No with a 62% probability versus 38% for Yes. Season BTTS rates are similar (46% for Békéscsaba and 54% for Karcag, league 48%), but the league records a high clean sheet rate of 57%, favoring a no-goal-for-both scenario. In the last 5 rounds Békéscsaba had only 20% BTTS, scored 2 goals in 5 matches (0.4 per game) and conceded 7, while Karcag scored 6 goals in 5 matches (1.2 per game) yet season-long they have 38% matches without scoring and only 2.69 SOT per match. xG and shooting stats indicate limited threat from the visitors: home xG 1.66 versus xG against Karcag 1.64, and Karcag xG 1.14 versus xG against the hosts 1.46, which together with the guests’ low average SOT (2.69) and 31% home clean sheets increases the likelihood that at least one side will fail to score. Therefore the No scenario looks stronger based on a mix of the hosts’ poor form (0.4 goals in the last 5) and Karcag’s season-long scoring issues (38% no-goal matches).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model gives 1.65 expected goals for Békéscsaba (xG for attack 1.66 vs average xG conceded by Karcag 1.64 → 1.65) and 1.30 for Karcag SE (xG for attack 1.14 vs average xG conceded by the hosts 1.46 → 1.30), totaling 2.95 expected goals. Seasonal metrics show Over 1.5 occurred in 54% of home matches and 85% of away matches, while Over 2.5 occurred in 46% (home) and 23% (away), so the strongest signal is for Over 1.5. The hosts average 5.15 shots on target versus 2.69 for the visitors, and both-teams-to-score rates are 46%/54%, which increases the probability of at least two goals; clean sheets for the home side are rare (31%) and for the visitors even rarer (15%). In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 2 goals and the visitors 6 goals, and the league average is 2.53 goals per match, so I recommend Over 1.5 as the safest option; Over 2.5 is moderately likely and Over 3.5 has a low probability.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time has been the most frequent state this season: the home side have been level at the break in 46% of matches, while Karcag have been level at the break in 54% of their games, which increases the probability of an X at half-time. After the interval Békéscsaba hold the advantage — the home side’s average xG is 1.66 versus 1.14 for the visitors, the hosts score on average 1.00 goal in the second half compared to 0.46 for their opponents, and in 85% of their matches at least one goal is scored after the break. Seasonal metrics confirm this edge: the home team have 54% home wins and average 1.69 points per game, whereas Karcag have 15% wins and 0.92 points per game, so the Full-Time result favors Békéscsaba. Additionally, the hosts win second halves in 54% of cases versus 23% for the visitors and have scored 6 goals in minutes 76–90 compared to 2 for their opponents, which supports a Half-Time draw and a home win Full-Time (X/1). Note: in the last five matches the hosts have not won (0% wins), while Karcag have 40% wins in their last five, which increases the upset risk, but the xG advantage and second-half form point toward X/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Békéscsaba | Karcag SE | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Karcag SE is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - Békéscsaba · 1.2 pts / match - Karcag SE
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Karcag SE is 13% better for: goals scored per match.
0.96 goals / match - Békéscsaba · 1.08 goals / match - Karcag SE
Békéscsaba scores in 58% of matches (15 of 26 matches), while Karcag SE keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 matches).
Karcag SE scores in 69% of matches (18 of 26 matches), while Békéscsaba keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Békéscsaba
Over / Under - Karcag SE
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Békéscsaba is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.15 pts / match - Békéscsaba · 0.96 pts / match - Karcag SE
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Békéscsaba - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 19%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Karcag SE - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Békéscsaba
Karcag SE
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).
Teams vs league
| Békéscsaba | Liga | Karcag SE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.42 | 2.53 | • 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 46% | 48% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 44% | ▼ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 29% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | • 69% | 69% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 80% | • 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Békéscsaba 0 - 0 - 1 Karcag SE. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Békéscsaba vs Karcag SE?
The NB II match finished Békéscsaba 0:0 Karcag SE. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Békéscsaba vs Karcag SE?
Békéscsaba score 0.96 goals per game on average and Karcag SE 1.08. The NB II average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Békéscsaba's matches and 50% of Karcag SE's.
What form are Békéscsaba and Karcag SE in?
Over the last 5 games Békéscsaba have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Karcag SE 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Békéscsaba vs Karcag SE?
The statistical background for Békéscsaba vs Karcag SE — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.