Békéscsaba vs Szentlőrinc SE: match statistics
Békéscsaba vs Szentlőrinc SE: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Békéscsaba played Szentlőrinc SE in NB II (Hungary). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Békéscsaba: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Szentlőrinc SE: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Békéscsaba scores 1.00 and concedes 1.52 goals per match. Szentlőrinc SE scores 1.12 and concedes 1.60. League average: 2.54 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Békéscsaba 48%, Szentlőrinc SE 60%. Over 2.5: Békéscsaba 40%, Szentlőrinc SE 52%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 45%.
xG, shots and style
xG is very similar for both teams. Békéscsaba: 10.4 shots per match, Szentlőrinc SE: 10.6.
Match halves
Békéscsaba: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.44. Szentlőrinc SE: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.48.
Goals by minute
Békéscsaba: 31-45+ (8 goals). Szentlőrinc SE: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NB II: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 45%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorite is Békéscsaba — in the last 5 matches the home side averaged 1 point, while Szentlőrinc has only 0.4 points over the same period. Offensively Békéscsaba scored 5 goals in their last 5 fixtures, Szentlőrinc 4, but the biggest gap is defensively: the hosts conceded 5 goals in the last 5 matches, the visitors conceded 13. At home Békéscsaba averages 0.83 goals scored and concedes 1.25 goals with xG 1.33 for and 1.38 against, whereas Szentlőrinc away averages 0.83 goals scored and concedes 1.42 with xG 1.25 for and 1.66 against, which indicates a home advantage in limiting chances. Additionally the hosts have a 25% win rate at home versus just 8% away wins for the visitors, with similar shot efficiency (conversion 8% and 3.42 shots on target for the hosts vs 3.75 for the visitors), suggesting a low-scoring game but an edge for Békéscsaba. Due to better form and Szentlőrinc’s markedly weaker defense over the last 5 matches I project a home win 55%, draw 25%, away win 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal metrics give a slightly favorable signal for BTTS - Yes: Békéscsaba had BTTS in 69% of matches, Szentlőrinc in 50%, and the league average is 48%. However, the last-5 form weakens the hosts’ BTTS tendency — Békéscsaba had Goal/Goal in only 20% of their last 5, while Szentlőrinc in 40%; the visitors conceded 13 goals in those 5 matches (2.6 goals per game). xG and attacking data support an exchange of goals: seasonal xG for Békéscsaba is 1.39 versus 1.25 for Szentlőrinc, and average xG against are 1.50 and 1.66, meaning both teams generate and concede roughly 1.3–1.7 xG per match; average shots on target are 3.85 vs 3.75, and shot conversion rates of 12% vs 8% favor a home goal. Against BTTS - Yes is Szentlőrinc’s high share of matches without a goal — 42% of seasonal fixtures — and the fact that the hosts kept a clean sheet in only 15% of games; this increases the risk of a No Goal outcome. After weighing the strong seasonal signal for the hosts (69%), Szentlőrinc’s defensive frailty in the last 5 (13 goals conceded) and the xG balances, I estimate a 60% probability for BTTS - Yes and 40% for the opposite; the recommendation is 'Yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistics indicate multiple goals: Békéscsaba averages 1.38 goals per match (xG 1.39), while Szentlőrinc scores 0.83 goals (xG 1.25) and has conceded 13 goals in the last 5 matches (2.6 per match on average). Averaging season xG and defensive metrics (xG against Szentlőrinc 1.66, xG against Békéscsaba 1.50) yields a forecast of about 1.50 goals for the home side and 1.27 for the away side, totaling ~2.77 goals. Season Over 1.5 rates are 85% for the home team and 75% for the away team (80% average), so I assign Over 1.5 a high probability of 82%. Over 2.5 shows mixed signals (46% for the home team, 58% for the away team seasonally, but 80% for the away team in the last 5 matches), therefore I give a moderate edge to Over 2.5 (56%). Over 3.5 looks weaker (38%/8% seasonally), so Under 3.5 has the advantage and I do not recommend that line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Békéscsaba frequently leads at the break — they led in 6 matches (46%), while Szentlőrinc led in only 3 (25%), and the home side averages 0.77 goals by half-time versus 0.50 for the visitors. Additionally, Békéscsaba have a higher xG (1.39 vs 1.25) and more shots on average (11.23 vs 9.83), confirming an advantage in creating chances in the first half. The second half is problematic — the hosts average 0.62 goals scored and 1.31 conceded in the second half, and they record draws at full-time as much as 54%, so they often lose leads. On that basis I see the strongest HT/FT signal: a lead at the break for the home side and a draw at full-time (1/X) — I assign this a 25% probability; alternatives are draw/draw (X/X) 23% and holding the lead 1/1 14%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Békéscsaba | Szentlőrinc SE | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Békéscsaba is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Békéscsaba · 0.4 pts / match - Szentlőrinc SE
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Szentlőrinc SE is 12% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Békéscsaba · 1.12 goals / match - Szentlőrinc SE
Békéscsaba is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.52 goals / match - Békéscsaba · 1.6 goals / match - Szentlőrinc SE
Békéscsaba scores in 60% of matches (15 of 25 matches), while Szentlőrinc SE keeps a clean sheet in 20% (5 of 25 matches).
Szentlőrinc SE scores in 68% of matches (17 of 25 matches), while Békéscsaba keeps a clean sheet in 16% (4 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Békéscsaba
Over / Under - Szentlőrinc SE
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Szentlőrinc SE is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.16 pts / match - Békéscsaba · 1.52 pts / match - Szentlőrinc SE
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Békéscsaba - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 20%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Szentlőrinc SE - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 12%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Békéscsaba
Szentlőrinc SE
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).
Teams vs league
| Békéscsaba | Liga | Szentlőrinc SE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.52 | 2.54 | ▲ 2.72 |
| Both teams scored | • 48% | 48% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 45% | ▲ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 29% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 72% | 70% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 80% | • 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Békéscsaba 0 - 1 - 0 Szentlőrinc SE. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Békéscsaba vs Szentlőrinc SE?
The NB II match finished Békéscsaba 0:0 Szentlőrinc SE. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Békéscsaba vs Szentlőrinc SE?
Békéscsaba score 1.00 goals per game on average and Szentlőrinc SE 1.12. The NB II average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Békéscsaba's matches and 60% of Szentlőrinc SE's.
What form are Békéscsaba and Szentlőrinc SE in?
Over the last 5 games Békéscsaba have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Szentlőrinc SE 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Békéscsaba vs Szentlőrinc SE?
The statistical background for Békéscsaba vs Szentlőrinc SE — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


