Beltinci vs Dekani: match statistics
Beltinci vs Dekani: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Beltinci played Dekani in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Beltinci: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Dekani: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Beltinci scores 1.79 and concedes 0.79 goals per match. Dekani scores 1.17 and concedes 1.46. League average: 2.78 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Beltinci 46%, Dekani 50%. Over 2.5: Beltinci 50%, Dekani 54%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Beltinci has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.31. Beltinci: 13.8 shots per match, Dekani: 9.3.
Match halves
Beltinci: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.92. Dekani: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.54.
Goals by minute
Beltinci: 76-90+ (10 goals). Dekani: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.78 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Beltinci are the favorites for this match: they sit 4th in the table versus Dekani’s 9th, have 14 wins this season compared to the opponents’ 6, and boast a superior goal difference of 43:19 vs 28:35. In home matches Beltinci score on average 2.0 goals per game (average xG 1.94) and register 5.58 shots on target with 58% possession, while Dekani away average only 0.75 goals (xG 1.36), 3.25 shots on target and 42% possession. Defensively the hosts concede 1.08 goals at home on average and keep a clean sheet in 33% of matches, whereas Dekani concede 1.42 goals away and have only 8% clean sheets; in the last 5 games Beltinci conceded 4 goals versus 9 conceded by Dekani. Form trends and efficiency confirm the hosts’ advantage: Beltinci scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches and average 1.8 points per game in that period, while Dekani have 5 goals and 1.0 point per game, with the visitors failing to score in 50% of away matches. Considering the higher chance conversion (xG 1.94 vs 1.36), greater number of shots on target (5.58 vs 3.25) and a much lower percentage of goalless games (17% vs 50%), I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics indicate a moderately high probability of BTTS - Yes. Beltinci at home average 1.58 goals and have only 25% clean sheets, while Dekani away average 0.75 goals and keep a clean sheet in just 8% of matches. Dekani concede 1.42 goals on average away and have conceded 1.8 goals per game in their last 5 matches, showing vulnerability to conceding. Beltinci in the last 5 matches have xG_for 1.62 and an actual scoring average of 1.4 with a conversion rate of 18%, whereas Dekani have a season xG_for of 1.36 with an actual average of 0.75 and a conversion of 8% — the visitors create chances but convert them poorly. At the same time the hosts have defended better recently (last 5 matches - 0.8 conceded) but seasonally conceded 1.5 at home. Both teams have season BTTS rates of 50% against a league rate of 49%. In summary, considering 60% BTTS in the last 5 for Beltinci versus 40% for Dekani and the hosts’ superior conversion, I tip BTTS: Yes at 65% probability versus 35% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and opponent defense I calculated expected goals: home xG 1.26 and xG against visitors 1.44 give 1.35 expected goals for Beltinci, and visitors xG 1.36 and xG against hosts 1.21 give 1.29 for Dekani, total = 2.64. Seasonal statistics confirm a tendency for at least 2 goals: Beltinci has 83% of matches over 1.5, Dekani 75%, and both teams concede on average 1.5 (Beltinci, 19 this season) and 1.42 (Dekani, 35 this season) goals. The 2.5 line is more balanced: Beltinci has 75% of matches over 2.5, Dekani 33% and the league average 53%; with a projected 2.64 goals I rate Over 2.5 at about 58%. The chance of Over 3.5 is low (seasonally 25% for the home side and 17% for the visitors), therefore Over 3.5 ~20% and Under 80%. Additionally Beltinci averages 8.75 shots with 3.42 on target and has an 18% conversion, while Dekani averages 9.75 shots with an 8% conversion, indicating Dekani generates xG but converts less — the strongest signal is therefore Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Beltinci are the favorites: they average 1.58 goals per match versus Dekani’s 0.75, collect 1.33 points per match vs 0.75 and record 42% wins compared to just 8% for the visitors. A draw at the break is common — both teams were level at half-time in 42% of matches; hosts score on average 0.83 goals by half-time and visitors 0.42, with 75% of Beltinci’s matches having at least 0.5 goals by the break vs 67% for Dekani. Dekani generate higher xG (1.36 vs the hosts’ 1.26) but score far less (0.75 goals) with a low conversion rate of 8% versus Beltinci’s 18%, indicating finishing issues. In the second half the home advantage is pronounced: Beltinci average 0.75 second-half goals, have 18 points and 1.5 ppg in second halves, whereas Dekani have 8 points, 0.67 ppg and a -8 second-half goal difference, which strongly favors a turnaround after the break. For these reasons the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1) — I assign this scenario the highest probability at 34%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Beltinci | Dekani | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Beltinci is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Beltinci · 1 pts / match - Dekani
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Beltinci is 53% better for: goals scored per match.
1.79 goals / match - Beltinci · 1.17 goals / match - Dekani
Beltinci is 85% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.79 goals / match - Beltinci · 1.46 goals / match - Dekani
Beltinci scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while Dekani keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 matches).
Dekani scores in 63% of matches (15 of 24 matches), while Beltinci keeps a clean sheet in 50% (12 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Beltinci
Over / Under - Dekani
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Beltinci is 53% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.79 pts / match - Beltinci · 1.17 pts / match - Dekani
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Beltinci - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Dekani - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Beltinci
Dekani
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Beltinci | Liga | Dekani | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.58 | 2.78 | ▼ 2.63 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 46% | 50% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 54% | • 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 29% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 73% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 80% | • 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Beltinci 1 - 0 - 0 Dekani. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Beltinci vs Dekani?
The 2. SNL match finished Beltinci 2:0 Dekani. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Beltinci vs Dekani?
Beltinci score 1.79 goals per game on average and Dekani 1.17. The 2. SNL average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Beltinci's matches and 50% of Dekani's.
What form are Beltinci and Dekani in?
Over the last 5 games Beltinci have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Dekani 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Beltinci vs Dekani?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Beltinci vs Dekani: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.