Slovenia - 2. SNLData current as of 23 July 2026

Beltinci vs Dekani: match statistics

Beltinci crest
Beltinci
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Dekani crest
Dekani

Beltinci vs Dekani: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Beltinci play Dekani in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match date is 25 April 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Beltinci: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Dekani: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Beltinci scores 1.83 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Dekani scores 1.33 and concedes 1.53. League average: 2.82 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Beltinci 47%, Dekani 53%. Over 2.5: Beltinci 53%, Dekani 53%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Beltinci has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.32. Beltinci: 13.4 shots per match, Dekani: 9.4.

Match halves

Beltinci: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.97. Dekani: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

Beltinci: 76-90+ (12 goals). Dekani: 16-30 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Beltinci are the favorites for this match: they sit 4th in the table versus Dekani’s 9th, have 14 wins this season compared to the opponents’ 6, and boast a superior goal difference of 43:19 vs 28:35. In home matches Beltinci score on average 2.0 goals per game (average xG 1.94) and register 5.58 shots on target with 58% possession, while Dekani away average only 0.75 goals (xG 1.36), 3.25 shots on target and 42% possession. Defensively the hosts concede 1.08 goals at home on average and keep a clean sheet in 33% of matches, whereas Dekani concede 1.42 goals away and have only 8% clean sheets; in the last 5 games Beltinci conceded 4 goals versus 9 conceded by Dekani. Form trends and efficiency confirm the hosts’ advantage: Beltinci scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches and average 1.8 points per game in that period, while Dekani have 5 goals and 1.0 point per game, with the visitors failing to score in 50% of away matches. Considering the higher chance conversion (xG 1.94 vs 1.36), greater number of shots on target (5.58 vs 3.25) and a much lower percentage of goalless games (17% vs 50%), I predict a home win.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
BeltinciDekani
13Shots4
BeltinciDekani
8Shots on target4
BeltinciDekani
1.84xG0.94
BeltinciDekani
8Corners4
BeltinciDekani
62Dangerous attacks54
BeltinciDekani
-1Fouls-1
BeltinciDekani
-1Cards-1
BeltinciDekani

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.83Goals scored / match1.33
BeltinciDekani
0.83Goals conceded / match1.53
BeltinciDekani
55%Average possession45%
BeltinciDekani
5.47Shots on target / match3.67
BeltinciDekani

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.4Shots per match9.37
BeltinciDekani
5.47Shots on target3.67
BeltinciDekani
13.7%Shot conversion14.2%
BeltinciDekani
55%Possession45%
BeltinciDekani
1.74xG for1.32
BeltinciDekani
1.11xG against1.33
BeltinciDekani

Shooting quality

Beltinci: Efficient finishingDekani: Counter-attacking
BeltinciDekani
Accuracy (shots on target)41%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Beltinci is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Beltinci · 1.6 pts / match - Dekani

Beltinci
WWLLW
Season result split
60% W20% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
18-6-6
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +30
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-4
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Dekani
DLWDW
Season result split
27% W30% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-13
1.10 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-7-7
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Beltinci is 38% better for: goals scored per match.

1.83 goals / match - Beltinci · 1.33 goals / match - Dekani

Beltinci is 84% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.83 goals / match - Beltinci · 1.53 goals / match - Dekani

Beltinci scoring profile: very strong

Beltinci scores in 87% of matches (26 of 30 matches), while Dekani keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).

Dekani scoring profile: mixed

Dekani scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Beltinci keeps a clean sheet in 50% (15 of 30 matches).

55Goals scored (season)40
BeltinciDekani
25Goals conceded (season)46
BeltinciDekani
2.67Average goals in match2.87
BeltinciDekani
10Goals scored (last 5)12
BeltinciDekani
6Goals conceded (last 5)9
BeltinciDekani

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal63%
BeltinciDekani
60%2 goals40%
BeltinciDekani
27%3 goals20%
BeltinciDekani
7%4 goals7%
BeltinciDekani

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal87%
BeltinciDekani
23%2 goals50%
BeltinciDekani
10%3 goals13%
BeltinciDekani
0%4 goals3%
BeltinciDekani

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time27%
BeltinciDekani
3%BTTS in both halves3%
BeltinciDekani
40%Scored in both halves23%
BeltinciDekani

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
BeltinciDekani
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
BeltinciDekani
60%BTTS - last 580%
BeltinciDekani

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
BeltinciDekani
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
BeltinciDekani
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
BeltinciDekani

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
BeltinciDekani
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
BeltinciDekani
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
BeltinciDekani

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Beltinci is 68% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.8 pts / match - Beltinci · 1.07 pts / match - Dekani

Beltinci - half-time state
50% leading30% draw20% trailing
Dekani - half-time state
23% leading37% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.8Points per match (1st half)1.07
BeltinciDekani
0.87Goals scored (1st half)0.7
BeltinciDekani
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.77
BeltinciDekani
1.27Average goals (1st half)1.47
BeltinciDekani
73%Clean sheet before half-time37%
BeltinciDekani
40%No goal before half-time60%
BeltinciDekani

After half-time (2nd half)

1.77Points per match (2nd half)1.2
BeltinciDekani
0.97Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
BeltinciDekani
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.77
BeltinciDekani
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.4
BeltinciDekani
67%Clean sheet after half-time47%
BeltinciDekani
33%No goal after half-time53%
BeltinciDekani

Beltinci - second-half results

47% W37% R17% P
54
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding120%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dekani - second-half results

30% W30% R40% P
32
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Beltinci - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Dekani - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match1.40.4
Average goals in match2.61.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Beltinci
ScoredConceded
10
1
0-15
8
6
16-30
8
5
31-45
9
3
46-60
8
6
61-75
12
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Dekani
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
12
6
16-30
4
12
31-45
9
8
46-60
4
4
61-75
6
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.76
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-64%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Beltinci

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.63
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Dekani

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

BeltinciLigaDekani
Average goals in match 2.672.82 2.87
Both teams scored 47%50% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%54% 53%
Clean sheets 50%28% 13%
Goal before half-time 73%74% 77%
Goal after half-time 77%81% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.82
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Beltinci 1 - 0 - 0 Dekani. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

NK Jadran Dekani
0 : 1
ND Beltinci

FAQ

What was the result of Beltinci vs Dekani?

The 2. SNL match finished Beltinci 2:0 Dekani. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Beltinci vs Dekani?

Beltinci score 1.83 goals per game on average and Dekani 1.33. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Beltinci's matches and 53% of Dekani's.

What form are Beltinci and Dekani in?

Over the last 5 games Beltinci have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Dekani 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Beltinci vs Dekani?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Beltinci vs Dekani: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.