Slovenia - 2. SNLData current as of 13 September 2026

Beltinci vs Rudar: match statistics

Beltinci crest
Beltinci
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Rudar crest
Rudar
155%(0.00)
X27%(0.00)
218%(0.00)

Beltinci presents a solid home form with a 44% win rate and an impressive +10 goal difference in their home matches. The hosts average 2.22 goals per home game while conceding just 1.11, confirming their offensive superiority. Rudar has a problematic away record with a 44% loss rate and only a 33% win rate, conceding an average of 1.56 goals on the road. The recent form of both teams is similar (2.0 vs 1.6 PPG), but Beltinci's home advantage and higher offensive efficiency (xG 1.96 vs 1.43) tip the scales in the hosts' favor. The difference in ball possession (58% vs 49%) and a better shot conversion rate further support the prediction of a Beltinci win, though their inconsistent home form (ldwwwllwd) leaves room for a draw.

Beltinci vs Rudar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Beltinci played Rudar in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 15 March 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Beltinci: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Rudar: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Beltinci scores 1.89 and concedes 0.78 goals per match. Rudar scores 1.61 and concedes 1.28. League average: 2.82 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Beltinci 39%, Rudar 56%. Over 2.5: Beltinci 56%, Rudar 61%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Beltinci has higher xG: 1.82 vs 1.52. Beltinci: 14.3 shots per match, Rudar: 10.6.

Match halves

Beltinci: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 0.83. Rudar: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.61.

Goals by minute

Beltinci: 31-45+ (8 goals). Rudar: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Beltinci presents a solid home form with a 44% win rate and an impressive +10 goal difference in their home matches. The hosts average 2.22 goals per home game while conceding just 1.11, confirming their offensive superiority. Rudar has a problematic away record with a 44% loss rate and only a 33% win rate, conceding an average of 1.56 goals on the road. The recent form of both teams is similar (2.0 vs 1.6 PPG), but Beltinci's home advantage and higher offensive efficiency (xG 1.96 vs 1.43) tip the scales in the hosts' favor. The difference in ball possession (58% vs 49%) and a better shot conversion rate further support the prediction of a Beltinci win, though their inconsistent home form (ldwwwllwd) leaves room for a draw.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
BeltinciRudar
12Shots11
BeltinciRudar
6Shots on target2
BeltinciRudar
1.7xG1.28
BeltinciRudar
2Corners2
BeltinciRudar
72Dangerous attacks61
BeltinciRudar
-1Fouls-1
BeltinciRudar
-1Cards-1
BeltinciRudar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.89Goals scored / match1.61
BeltinciRudar
0.78Goals conceded / match1.28
BeltinciRudar
55%Average possession51%
BeltinciRudar
5.83Shots on target / match4.56
BeltinciRudar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.28Shots per match10.61
BeltinciRudar
5.83Shots on target4.56
BeltinciRudar
13.2%Shot conversion15.2%
BeltinciRudar
55%Possession51%
BeltinciRudar
1.82xG for1.52
BeltinciRudar
1.13xG against1.55
BeltinciRudar

Shooting quality

Beltinci: DominantRudar: Efficient finishing
BeltinciRudar
Accuracy (shots on target)41%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Rudar is 10% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Beltinci · 2.2 pts / match - Rudar

Beltinci
WWLDW
Season result split
61% W17% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-3-4
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Rudar
WWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-6
1.33 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-4
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DLWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Beltinci is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.89 goals / match - Beltinci · 1.61 goals / match - Rudar

Beltinci is 64% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.78 goals / match - Beltinci · 1.28 goals / match - Rudar

Beltinci scoring profile: very strong

Beltinci scores in 83% of matches (15 of 18 matches), while Rudar keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 matches).

Rudar scoring profile: mixed

Rudar scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Beltinci keeps a clean sheet in 56% (10 of 18 matches).

34Goals scored (season)29
BeltinciRudar
14Goals conceded (season)23
BeltinciRudar
2.67Average goals in match2.89
BeltinciRudar
6Goals scored (last 5)13
BeltinciRudar
2Goals conceded (last 5)3
BeltinciRudar

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal72%
BeltinciRudar
61%2 goals50%
BeltinciRudar
28%3 goals17%
BeltinciRudar
11%4 goals11%
BeltinciRudar

How often they concede at least...

44%1 goal72%
BeltinciRudar
22%2 goals33%
BeltinciRudar
11%3 goals17%
BeltinciRudar
0%4 goals6%
BeltinciRudar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
BeltinciRudar
6%BTTS in both halves6%
BeltinciRudar
50%Scored in both halves22%
BeltinciRudar

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
BeltinciRudar
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
BeltinciRudar
20%BTTS - last 560%
BeltinciRudar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
BeltinciRudar
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
BeltinciRudar
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
BeltinciRudar

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
BeltinciRudar
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
BeltinciRudar
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
BeltinciRudar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Beltinci is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.94 pts / match - Beltinci · 1.5 pts / match - Rudar

Beltinci - half-time state
56% leading28% draw17% trailing
Rudar - half-time state
39% leading33% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.94Points per match (1st half)1.5
BeltinciRudar
1.06Goals scored (1st half)0.89
BeltinciRudar
0.39Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
BeltinciRudar
1.44Average goals (1st half)1.44
BeltinciRudar
78%Clean sheet before half-time61%
BeltinciRudar
28%No goal before half-time56%
BeltinciRudar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.72Points per match (2nd half)1.17
BeltinciRudar
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.61
BeltinciRudar
0.39Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
BeltinciRudar
1.22Average goals (2nd half)1.22
BeltinciRudar
67%Clean sheet after half-time50%
BeltinciRudar
39%No goal after half-time56%
BeltinciRudar

Beltinci - second-half results

44% W39% D17% L
35
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding109%

Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Rudar - second-half results

22% W50% D28% L
27
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Beltinci - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+5-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Rudar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.60
Goals scored / match1.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+7+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Beltinci
ScoredConceded
5
0
0-15
6
5
16-30
8
2
31-45
4
3
46-60
4
1
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Rudar
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
7
4
16-30
7
3
31-45
1
4
46-60
7
3
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.78
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+44%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Beltinci

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.69
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Rudar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.87
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

BeltinciLigaRudar
Average goals in match 2.672.82 2.89
Both teams scored 39%47% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%53% 61%
Clean sheets 56%30% 28%
Goal before half-time 78%77% 67%
Goal after half-time 72%79% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.82
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. RudarGoalAdam Vošnjak
  2. BeltinciGoalMurat Bajraj
  3. BeltinciGoalMarin Ranteša

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Beltinci 0 - 1 - 0 Rudar. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

NK Rudar Velenje
2 : 2
ND Beltinci

FAQ

What was the result of Beltinci vs Rudar?

The 2. SNL match finished Beltinci 2:1 Rudar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Beltinci vs Rudar?

Beltinci score 1.89 goals per game on average and Rudar 1.61. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Beltinci's matches and 56% of Rudar's.

What form are Beltinci and Rudar in?

Over the last 5 games Beltinci have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Rudar 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Beltinci vs Rudar?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.