Berekum Chelsea vs Hohoe United: match statistics
Berekum Chelsea vs Hohoe United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Berekum Chelsea played Hohoe United in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match was played on 14 December 2025. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Berekum Chelsea: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Hohoe United: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Berekum Chelsea scores 0.69 and concedes 1.23 goals per match. Hohoe United scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 1.88 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Berekum Chelsea 38%, Hohoe United 46%. Over 2.5: Berekum Chelsea 31%, Hohoe United 15%. League level: BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 30%.
xG, shots and style
Hohoe United has higher xG: 1.14 vs 0.82. Berekum Chelsea: 2.2 shots per match, Hohoe United: 7.4.
Match halves
Berekum Chelsea: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.31. Hohoe United: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.38.
Goals by minute
Berekum Chelsea: 31-45+ (4 goals). Hohoe United: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ghana Premier League: 1.88 goals per match, BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 30%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Berekum Chelsea | Hohoe United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 14% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.37 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 2.23 | 0.50 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Hohoe United is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Berekum Chelsea · 1.6 pts / match - Hohoe United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Hohoe United is 45% better for: goals scored per match.
0.69 goals / match - Berekum Chelsea · 1 goals / match - Hohoe United
Hohoe United is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.23 goals / match - Berekum Chelsea · 1 goals / match - Hohoe United
Berekum Chelsea scores in 54% of matches (7 of 13 matches), while Hohoe United keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).
Hohoe United scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while Berekum Chelsea keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Berekum Chelsea
Over / Under - Hohoe United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hohoe United is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / match - Berekum Chelsea · 1.69 pts / match - Hohoe United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Berekum Chelsea - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 23%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Hohoe United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 31%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Berekum Chelsea
Hohoe United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Berekum Chelsea | Liga | Hohoe United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 1.92 | 1.88 | ▲ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 38% | 36% | ▲ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 31% | 30% | ▼ 15% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 41% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | • 62% | 61% | ▼ 54% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 77% | 61% | ▲ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of Berekum Chelsea vs Hohoe United?
The Ghana Premier League match finished Berekum Chelsea 1:0 Hohoe United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Berekum Chelsea vs Hohoe United?
Berekum Chelsea score 0.69 goals per game on average and Hohoe United 1.00. The Ghana Premier League average is 1.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Berekum Chelsea's matches and 46% of Hohoe United's.
What form are Berekum Chelsea and Hohoe United in?
Over the last 5 games Berekum Chelsea have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Hohoe United 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Berekum Chelsea vs Hohoe United?
The statistical background for Berekum Chelsea vs Hohoe United — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.