Berekum Chelsea vs Young Apostles: match statistics
Berekum Chelsea are displaying significantly superior home form with a 64% win rate at their own ground and an impressive +7 goal difference at home. The hosts have collected 10 points in their last 5 matches (2 PPG), while Young Apostles have managed only 5 points (1 PPG). Particularly alarming for the visitors are their away statistics – just an 8% win rate, 67% of matches without a goal scored, and a -10 goal difference. Berekum Chelsea average 1.18 goals scored per home game while conceding just 0.55, which, combined with a 55% clean sheet rate, gives them a massive advantage. Young Apostles average only 0.33 goals per away match, which, against the hosts' solid defense, makes their chances of securing points minimal. The recent form of both sides (WLWWD for the hosts vs DDWLL for the visitors) and the possession advantage (52% vs 43%) further support the prediction of a confident victory for Berekum Chelsea.
Berekum Chelsea vs Young Apostles: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Berekum Chelsea played Young Apostles in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match was played on 1 March 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Berekum Chelsea: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Young Apostles: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Berekum Chelsea scores 0.78 and concedes 1.04 goals per match. Young Apostles scores 0.91 and concedes 1.17. League average: 1.89 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Berekum Chelsea 35%, Young Apostles 39%. Over 2.5: Berekum Chelsea 30%, Young Apostles 35%. League level: BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 30%.
xG, shots and style
Young Apostles has higher xG: 1.37 vs 0.98. Berekum Chelsea: 2.2 shots per match, Young Apostles: 4.4.
Match halves
Berekum Chelsea: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.43. Young Apostles: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.61.
Goals by minute
Berekum Chelsea: 31-45+ (4 goals). Young Apostles: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ghana Premier League: 1.89 goals per match, BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 30%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Berekum Chelsea are displaying significantly superior home form with a 64% win rate at their own ground and an impressive +7 goal difference at home. The hosts have collected 10 points in their last 5 matches (2 PPG), while Young Apostles have managed only 5 points (1 PPG). Particularly alarming for the visitors are their away statistics – just an 8% win rate, 67% of matches without a goal scored, and a -10 goal difference. Berekum Chelsea average 1.18 goals scored per home game while conceding just 0.55, which, combined with a 55% clean sheet rate, gives them a massive advantage. Young Apostles average only 0.33 goals per away match, which, against the hosts' solid defense, makes their chances of securing points minimal. The recent form of both sides (WLWWD for the hosts vs DDWLL for the visitors) and the possession advantage (52% vs 43%) further support the prediction of a confident victory for Berekum Chelsea.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Berekum Chelsea | Young Apostles | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 23% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.44 | 0.31 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.50 | 0.75 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Berekum Chelsea is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Berekum Chelsea · 1 pts / match - Young Apostles
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Young Apostles is 17% better for: goals scored per match.
0.78 goals / match - Berekum Chelsea · 0.91 goals / match - Young Apostles
Berekum Chelsea is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.04 goals / match - Berekum Chelsea · 1.17 goals / match - Young Apostles
Berekum Chelsea scores in 52% of matches (12 of 23 matches), while Young Apostles keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 matches).
Young Apostles scores in 52% of matches (12 of 23 matches), while Berekum Chelsea keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Berekum Chelsea
Over / Under - Young Apostles
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Berekum Chelsea is 35% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.3 pts / match - Berekum Chelsea · 0.96 pts / match - Young Apostles
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Berekum Chelsea - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Young Apostles - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Berekum Chelsea
Young Apostles
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Berekum Chelsea | Liga | Young Apostles | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 1.83 | 1.89 | ▲ 2.09 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 35% | 33% | ▲ 39% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 30% | 30% | ▲ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 35% | 42% | ▼ 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 61% | ▲ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 70% | 61% | ▲ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Berekum Chelsea 0 - 1 - 0 Young Apostles. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Berekum Chelsea vs Young Apostles?
The Ghana Premier League match finished Berekum Chelsea 1:1 Young Apostles. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Berekum Chelsea vs Young Apostles?
Berekum Chelsea score 0.78 goals per game on average and Young Apostles 0.91. The Ghana Premier League average is 1.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 35% of Berekum Chelsea's matches and 39% of Young Apostles's.
What form are Berekum Chelsea and Young Apostles in?
Over the last 5 games Berekum Chelsea have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Young Apostles 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Berekum Chelsea vs Young Apostles?
The statistical background for Berekum Chelsea vs Young Apostles — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.