Bulgaria - Second LeagueBoris Paichadze Dinamo ArenaData current as of 19 October 2026

Beroe vs Montana: match statistics

Beroe crest
Beroe
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Montana crest
Montana

Beroe vs Montana: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Beroe played Montana in Second League (Bulgaria). The match was played on 3 September 2026. Venue: Boris Paichadze Dinamo Arena. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Beroe: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Montana: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Beroe scores 1.50 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Montana scores 2.00 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.60 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Beroe 33%, Montana 67%. Over 2.5: Beroe 50%, Montana 83%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

Montana has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.24. Beroe: 9.5 shots per match, Montana: 12.2.

Match halves

Beroe: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.67. Montana: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Beroe: 16-30 (2 goals). Montana: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second League: 2.60 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-2-0. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Beroe are favorites primarily due to their outstanding home form: they have won all 3 home matches so far, scoring an average of 2.33 goals and conceding just 0.33. Montana are still without an away win, and in their 3 matches on the road, they have lost 67% of the time while conceding an average of 2.33 goals. The hosts also have a clearly stronger defense, keeping a clean sheet in 67% of their home matches, whereas the visitors have failed to record a single away clean sheet. Montana are capable of creating chances, as shown by their 1.55 xG and 5.33 shots on target per away match, but Beroe have a favorable chance-quality profile at home: 1.39 xG compared with 1.15 xG conceded. Both teams have picked up 7 points in their last 5 matches, but home advantage and Montana’s defensive weakness on the road point to a Beroe victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is primarily driven by Montana’s very poor defensive record: the visitors concede an average of 2.33 goals, have kept no clean sheets, and BTTS has landed in 100% of their league matches. Beroe should be able to exploit this matchup, as they score an average of 2.00 goals at home, generate 1.81 xG, and record 5.0 shots on target per match. Montana also possesses offensive arguments, scoring an average of 1.67 goals with 1.55 xG and 5.33 shots on target, while averaging 1.8 goals per game across their last five matches. The risk to the pick is Beroe’s defence, which concedes only 0.50 goals at home and has a 50% clean-sheet rate, reducing confidence in an away goal. Although Beroe’s last five matches produced BTTS in only 20% of cases, both teams’ regular scoring and Montana’s defensive weakness give a slight edge to the scenario of a goal for each side.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Beroe average 2.00 goals at home, while Montana concede as many as 2.33 goals per away match, which clearly increases the hosts’ attacking potential. The visitors also score regularly, averaging 1.67 goals, although Beroe’s solid defence allows opponents just 0.50 goals at home. In Montana’s last five matches, games produced an average of 3.4 goals, with the 2.5-goal line exceeded in 80% of those fixtures. At the same time, the average xG stands at 1.81 for Beroe and 1.55 for Montana, making an expectation of around 3.02 goals justified. The strongest selection remains Over 1.5 goals, as both teams have scored at least once in 100% of their matches so far this season.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Beroe win, as both teams have been level at the break in all of their league matches so far: the hosts twice and Montana three times. However, Beroe have a significantly better overall record, averaging 2.00 goals scored and conceding just 0.50, while Montana concede as many as 2.33 goals per match and have not won a single game. After the break, the hosts average 1.50 goals scored and have yet to concede, whereas the visitors score just 0.33 and concede 1.00 goal. Beroe’s advantage is also confirmed by their points efficiency in the second half: the hosts have won 100% of their matches, while Montana have recorded no victories.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
BeroeMontana
15Shots9
BeroeMontana
4Shots on target5
BeroeMontana
1.92xG1.29
BeroeMontana
3Corners3
BeroeMontana
95Dangerous attacks50
BeroeMontana
15Fouls15
BeroeMontana
0Cards0
BeroeMontana

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.5Goals scored / match2
BeroeMontana
1Goals conceded / match1.33
BeroeMontana
47%Average possession53%
BeroeMontana
3.33Shots on target / match5
BeroeMontana

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match12.17
BeroeMontana
3.33Shots on target5
BeroeMontana
15.8%Shot conversion16.4%
BeroeMontana
47%Possession53%
BeroeMontana
1.24xG for1.52
BeroeMontana
1.26xG against1.33
BeroeMontana

Shooting quality

Beroe: Counter-attackingMontana: Efficient finishing
BeroeMontana
Accuracy (shots on target)35%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.450.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Montana is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Beroe · 1.8 pts / match - Montana

Beroe
LWLWD
Season result split
50% W17% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-2
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-0
Last 5 at home
3-0-0
WWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Montana
WLWLW
Season result split
50% W17% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-2
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-2
Last 5 away
0-1-2
DLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Montana is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Beroe · 2 goals / match - Montana

Beroe is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Beroe · 1.33 goals / match - Montana

Beroe scoring profile: strong

Beroe scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Montana keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).

Montana scoring profile: very strong

Montana scores in 100% of matches (6 of 6 matches), while Beroe keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).

9Goals scored (season)12
BeroeMontana
6Goals conceded (season)8
BeroeMontana
2.5Average goals in match3.33
BeroeMontana
7Goals scored (last 5)10
BeroeMontana
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
BeroeMontana

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal100%
BeroeMontana
67%2 goals67%
BeroeMontana
17%3 goals33%
BeroeMontana
0%4 goals0%
BeroeMontana

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal67%
BeroeMontana
33%2 goals50%
BeroeMontana
0%3 goals17%
BeroeMontana
0%4 goals0%
BeroeMontana

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time67%
BeroeMontana
0%BTTS in both halves17%
BeroeMontana
33%Scored in both halves50%
BeroeMontana

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
BeroeMontana
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
BeroeMontana
20%BTTS - last 560%
BeroeMontana

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
BeroeMontana
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
BeroeMontana
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
BeroeMontana

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
BeroeMontana
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
BeroeMontana
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
BeroeMontana

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Beroe is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.83 pts / match - Beroe · 1.33 pts / match - Montana

Beroe - half-time state
50% leading33% draw17% trailing
Montana - half-time state
17% leading83% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.83Points per match (1st half)1.33
BeroeMontana
0.83Goals scored (1st half)1
BeroeMontana
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
BeroeMontana
1.17Average goals (1st half)1.83
BeroeMontana
67%Clean sheet before half-time33%
BeroeMontana
50%No goal before half-time17%
BeroeMontana

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.67
BeroeMontana
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)1
BeroeMontana
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
BeroeMontana
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1.5
BeroeMontana
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
BeroeMontana
50%No goal after half-time33%
BeroeMontana

Beroe - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Montana - second-half results

50% W17% D33% L
8
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding294%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Beroe - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Montana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Beroe
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
2
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
2
2
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Montana
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
2
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.92
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Beroe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Montana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
190%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).

Teams vs league

BeroeLigaMontana
Average goals in match▼ 2.502.60▲ 3.33
Both teams scored▼ 33%47%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%42%▲ 83%
Clean sheets▲ 33%29%▲ 33%
Goal before half-time▲ 67%63%▲ 83%
Goal after half-time▲ 83%77%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.60
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.55
Home goals / match
1.05
Away goals / match
+48%
Home attack advantage
+32%
Home defence advantage
+28%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Beroe 1 - 2 - 0 Montana. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Beroe vs Montana?

The Second League match finished Beroe 0:0 Montana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Beroe and Montana?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Beroe won 1, Montana won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Beroe vs Montana?

Beroe score 1.50 goals per game on average and Montana 2.00. The Second League average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Beroe's matches and 67% of Montana's.

What form are Beroe and Montana in?

Over the last 5 games Beroe have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Montana 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Beroe vs Montana?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.