Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 06 September 2026

BFC Daugavpils vs Riga: match statistics

BFC Daugavpils crest
BFC Daugavpils
1 : 3half-time 0:1
Riga crest
Riga

BFC Daugavpils vs Riga: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

BFC Daugavpils played Riga in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 8 May 2026. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

BFC Daugavpils: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Riga: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

BFC Daugavpils scores 1.30 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Riga scores 3.30 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: BFC Daugavpils 60%, Riga 60%. Over 2.5: BFC Daugavpils 40%, Riga 90%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Riga has higher xG: 2.03 vs 1.52. BFC Daugavpils: 12.4 shots per match, Riga: 16.9.

Match halves

BFC Daugavpils: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.80. Riga: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 1.70.

Goals by minute

BFC Daugavpils: 46-60 (7 goals). Riga: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-3. Average goals 2.60, BTTS 60%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the away win (Riga). The primary argument is offensive superiority: Riga averages 3.5 goals on the road (15 goals in the last 5 matches) versus the hosts' 1.0 goals at home (6 goals in the last 5). The visitors have significantly better finishing — conversion around 23% vs 7% for BFC — and average 15.17 shots and 6.67 on target per away match compared to the hosts' 13.4 shots and 5.6 on target. Riga collects an average of 2.6 points in the last 5 matches, BFC 1.6, with the visitors having 0% matches without a goal away vs 40% for the hosts; xG shows a moderate advantage 1.88 vs 1.71, indicating the gap stems from finishing efficiency. BFC’s only notable edge is lower average turnovers at the stadium (0.6 vs 1.17), but that does not offset the offensive disparity, so I favor Riga.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show strong offensive potential: BFC Daugavpils averages 3.0 goals per match (xG 2.27), while Riga averages 3.5 goals (xG 1.88), indicating both sides regularly create dangerous chances. Riga is particularly efficient – 23% shot conversion, season BTTS at 67% and only 33% clean sheets, meaning they concede in 67% of matches. The hosts have 50% clean sheets this season and a season BTTS of 50%, but in the last 5 matches BFC scored 6 and conceded 5 (avg 1.2 and 1.0), whereas Riga in their last 5 scored 15 and conceded 4 (avg 3.0 and 0.8), showing both teams can both score and concede. Additionally, the league features a high BTTS share (59%) and an average of 2.82 goals per match, with home matches exceeding 2.5 goals in 75% of cases and away matches in 100%, which favors a both-teams-to-score scenario. Based on this data, the strongest signal supports the yes (BTTS - Yes) variant and I assess its probability at 70%, versus 30% for no (No Goal).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG model projects 1.69 goals for the home side (xG 2.27 vs Riga defense 1.10) and 1.33 for the away side (xG 1.88 vs Daugavpils defense 0.79), totaling ≈3.02 goals. Season metrics show a strong bias toward goals: Over 1.5 at 75% (Daugavpils) and 100% (Riga), and Over 2.5 at 75% and 100% respectively, supporting a high probability of exceeding both 1.5 and 2.5. In the last 5 matches Daugavpils averages 1.2 goals, Riga 3.0 (4.2 combined), but Daugavpils had only 20% Over 2.5 in their last 5, which reduces confidence in extremely high scores. Riga is also more efficient with chances (conversion rate 23% vs 15%) and has 33 goals scored this season versus the home side’s 13, therefore I back the Over on the 2.5 line as the strongest signal from the data.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is 2/2 (Riga leads at the break and wins). In the last 5 matches Riga led at half-time in 60% of games and scored 12 goals before the break, while BFC Daugavpils scored only 1 first-half goal in the same period and led at the break in 20% of cases. Riga won 80% of their last 5 matches versus 40% for the hosts, and in second halves Riga average 1.83 goals and perform better after the break (2.33) than the hosts, who register 1.5 and 1.75 in those metrics; this suggests an advantage for the visitors after the break. Although the hosts’ xG is higher (2.27 vs 1.88), Riga’s shot conversion is 23% versus the hosts’ 15%, and Riga have 15 goals scored before half-time this season compared to the hosts’ 7, which supports their ability to gain and maintain a lead; therefore the highest weight is given to 2/2 (40%), with X/2 (19%) and 2/X (8%) as the next realistic scenarios.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
8Shots13
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
1Shots on target7
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
0.82xG1.81
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
4Corners2
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
33Dangerous attacks68
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
8Fouls14
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
1Cards1
BFC DaugavpilsRiga

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.3Goals scored / match3.3
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
1.5Goals conceded / match1.2
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
48%Average possession66%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
4.8Shots on target / match6.5
BFC DaugavpilsRiga

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.4Shots per match16.9
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
4.8Shots on target6.5
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
10.5%Shot conversion19.5%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
48%Possession66%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
1.52xG for2.03
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
1.47xG against0.97
BFC DaugavpilsRiga

Shooting quality

BFC Daugavpils: BalancedRiga: Dominant
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
Accuracy (shots on target)39%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.51

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Riga is 63% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils · 2.6 pts / match - Riga

BFC Daugavpils
WWDLD
Season result split
40% W20% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-4
1.40 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Riga
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
70% W20% R10% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-1
2.30 pts / match · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.01Opponent xG: 0.81BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga is 154% better for: goals scored per match.

1.3 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils · 3.3 goals / match - Riga

Riga is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils · 1.2 goals / match - Riga

BFC Daugavpils scoring profile: strong

BFC Daugavpils scores in 80% of matches (8 of 10 matches), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 matches).

Riga scoring profile: very strong

Riga scores in 100% of matches (10 of 10 matches), while BFC Daugavpils keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 matches).

13Goals scored (season)33
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
15Goals conceded (season)12
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
2.8Average goals in match4.5
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
6Goals scored (last 5)15
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
BFC DaugavpilsRiga

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal100%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
40%2 goals80%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
10%3 goals70%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
0%4 goals40%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal60%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
30%2 goals40%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
20%3 goals20%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
20%4 goals0%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time40%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
0%BTTS in both halves20%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
20%Scored in both halves70%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS30%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
60%BTTS - last 540%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time90%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time80%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time40%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils · 2 pts / match - Riga

BFC Daugavpils - half-time state
30% leading60% draw10% trailing
Riga - half-time state
60% leading20% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)2
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
0.5Goals scored (1st half)1.6
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
0.3Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
0.8Average goals (1st half)2.2
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
80%Clean sheet before half-time50%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
60%No goal before half-time20%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)2.1
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)1.7
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
1.2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
2Average goals (2nd half)2.3
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
20%Clean sheet after half-time60%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga
40%No goal after half-time10%
BFC DaugavpilsRiga

BFC Daugavpils - second-half results

20% W40% R40% P
15
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.9

Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Riga - second-half results

60% W30% R10% P
20
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 70%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

BFC Daugavpils - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.22.0
1 goal20%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Riga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.60
Goals scored / match1.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match2.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+6+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 9

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

BFC Daugavpils
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
2
16-30
2
1
31-45
7
7
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Riga
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
2
16-30
8
2
31-45
4
3
46-60
5
1
61-75
8
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.65
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 2.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
122%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-29%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
80%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

BFC Daugavpils

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Riga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
228%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

BFC DaugavpilsLigaRiga
Average goals in match 2.802.98 4.50
Both teams scored 60%58% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%51% 90%
Clean sheets 20%21% 40%
Goal before half-time 50%74% 90%
Goal after half-time 100%87% 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.45
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defence advantage
+-13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. BFC DaugavpilsGoalPapa Omar Gningue
  2. BFC DaugavpilsGoalJoel YakubuAssist: Ervīns Piņaskins
  3. BFC DaugavpilsYellow cardPapa Omar Gningue
  4. BFC DaugavpilsSubstitutionOn: Daniel KiwindaOff: Rostand Ndjiki

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): BFC Daugavpils 1 - 1 - 3 Riga. Average goals 2.60, both teams scored in 60% matches.

Riga
4 : 2
BFC Daugavpils
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
0 : 1
Riga FC
Riga FC
1 : 1
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
0 : 1
Riga FC
Riga FC
1 : 2
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils

FAQ

What was the result of BFC Daugavpils vs Riga?

The Virsliga match finished BFC Daugavpils 1:3 Riga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between BFC Daugavpils and Riga?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches BFC Daugavpils won 1, Riga won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before BFC Daugavpils vs Riga?

BFC Daugavpils score 1.30 goals per game on average and Riga 3.30. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 60% of BFC Daugavpils's matches and 60% of Riga's.

What form are BFC Daugavpils and Riga in?

Over the last 5 games BFC Daugavpils have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Riga 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for BFC Daugavpils vs Riga?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.