Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of 13 September 2026

Bhayangkara vs PSIM Yogyakarta: match statistics

Bhayangkara crest
Bhayangkara
2 : 1half-time 0:1
PSIM Yogyakarta crest
PSIM Yogyakarta

Bhayangkara vs PSIM Yogyakarta: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Bhayangkara played PSIM Yogyakarta in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match was played on 17 April 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Bhayangkara: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. PSIM Yogyakarta: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Bhayangkara scores 1.33 and concedes 1.15 goals per match. PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.33 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.73 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Bhayangkara 52%, PSIM Yogyakarta 52%. Over 2.5: Bhayangkara 44%, PSIM Yogyakarta 52%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

PSIM Yogyakarta has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.28. Bhayangkara: 10.4 shots per match, PSIM Yogyakarta: 13.1.

Match halves

Bhayangkara: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 0.70. PSIM Yogyakarta: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.93.

Goals by minute

Bhayangkara: 76-90+ (10 goals). PSIM Yogyakarta: 61-75 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 1: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Bhayangkara holds a clear advantage in form and efficiency: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches and are averaging 2.4 points per game in that span, whereas PSIM in their last 5 have only 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses and 1.0 point per game. Both teams have 36 goals this season, but Bhayangkara at home score on average 1.62 goals and concede 0.77 per match, while PSIM score 1.36 away and concede 1.21, giving a distinct defensive edge to the hosts. The visitors enjoy more possession (55% vs 47%) and more shots per game (12.93 vs 11.46) and more shots on target (4.57 vs 3.62), but convert only 10% of their chances versus the hosts’ 14% and more often finish matches goalless (36% vs 8%). xG metrics show PSIM create 1.52 xG per game against Bhayangkara’s 1.41, however they also concede 1.55 xG versus the hosts’ 1.05, so the visitors generate quality chances but are vulnerable to conceding. Considering Bhayangkara’s 62% home win rate, superior 14% conversion and current form (2.4 pts/last 5), I predict a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes because seasonal signals and form indicate goals at both ends: Bhayangkara has a season BTTS of 62%, PSIM 43%, but in the last 5 matches both teams produced BTTS in 60% of cases. xG and shot numbers confirm chance creation – xG for 1.61 (Bhayangkara) and 1.52 (PSIM), xG against 1.26 and 1.55, and shots on target 4.08 and 4.57, which suggests clear scoring opportunities for both sides. In the last 5 fixtures Bhayangkara scored 12 goals (2.4 avg) and conceded 5 (1.0), while PSIM scored 7 (1.4) and conceded 7 (1.4), so hosts are stronger offensively but visitors also concede. Counterarguments are PSIM’s 36% matches without a goal and seasonal average goals 1.36 and 1.31, which reduce certainty; however the league posts BTTS 56% and over2.5 around 50–54%, so the balance points to a higher probability of both teams scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG calculations: expected goals 1.58 for Bhayangkara and 1.39 for PSIM, total 2.97. Seasonally Bhayangkara has attacking xG 1.61 and 77% of matches with over 1.5 goals, PSIM has attacking xG 1.52 and 71% of such matches; in the last 5 matches Bhayangkara averaged 2.4 goals versus 1.4 for PSIM, which confirms a goals trend. A Poisson model with mean 2.97 gives roughly an 80% chance of Over 1.5 (P(0)+P(1) ≈20%), about 57% for Over 2.5 and 35% for Over 3.5. Consequently I recommend betting on Over 1.5 as the strongest and most data-driven pick; Over 2.5 is a moderate option (~57%), while Over 3.5 is relatively risky (~35%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I predict a draw at half-time because the home team drew at the break in 38% of matches and the away team in 71%; additionally, clean sheets at half-time occurred for the home side in 54% and for the visitors in 64% of fixtures, supporting goalless or low-scoring first halves. First-half goal averages are low (AVGHT: home 1.00 vs away 0.79) with mean goals scored by half of 0.38 (home) and 0.43 (away), so an HT draw is likely. After the break I expect a home advantage: in their last five matches they won 80% of games, in second halves they averaged 1.8 goals scored and 0.2 conceded, while the visitors average 0.8 scored and 1.0 conceded in second halves. Second halves are also more goal-rich (AVG_2hg: home 1.69 vs away 1.79) and in 85–86% of cases at least one goal is scored after the break, which supports a turnaround in favor of the home team. For these reasons the strongest signal is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

38Possession (%)62
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
12Shots17
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
7Shots on target6
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
1.59xG1.88
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
5Corners5
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
47Dangerous attacks55
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
18Fouls10
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
2Cards1
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
1.33Goals scored / match1.33
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
1.15Goals conceded / match1.3
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
45%Average possession58%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
3.48Shots on target / match4.33
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.37Shots per match13.11
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
3.48Shots on target4.33
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
12.9%Shot conversion10.2%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
45%Possession58%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
1.28xG for1.56
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
1.31xG against1.41
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

Shooting quality

Bhayangkara: Counter-attackingPSIM Yogyakarta: Balanced
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
Accuracy (shots on target)34%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Bhayangkara is 140% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Bhayangkara · 1 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Bhayangkara
WWWWL
Season result split
48% W19% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-5-9
1.63 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
PSIM Yogyakarta
WDDLL
Season result split
33% W41% D26% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-7
1.41 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Bhayangkara is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.15 goals / match - Bhayangkara · 1.3 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Bhayangkara scoring profile: very strong

Bhayangkara scores in 78% of matches (21 of 27 matches), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 matches).

PSIM Yogyakarta scoring profile: strong

PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 74% of matches (20 of 27 matches), while Bhayangkara keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).

36Goals scored (season)36
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
31Goals conceded (season)35
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
2.48Average goals in match2.63
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
12Goals scored (last 5)7
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal74%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
37%2 goals41%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
11%3 goals15%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
7%4 goals4%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal67%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
30%2 goals44%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
11%3 goals15%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
4%4 goals4%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time19%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
7%BTTS in both halves7%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
30%Scored in both halves19%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
60%BTTS - last 560%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time52%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Bhayangkara is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / match - Bhayangkara · 1.11 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Bhayangkara - half-time state
48% leading22% draw30% trailing
PSIM Yogyakarta - half-time state
19% leading56% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per match (1st half)1.11
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.41
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
1.19Average goals (1st half)0.89
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
59%Clean sheet before half-time59%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
44%No goal before half-time70%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per match (2nd half)1.52
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)0.93
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
1.3Average goals (2nd half)1.74
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
52%Clean sheet after half-time44%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
48%No goal after half-time37%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

Bhayangkara - second-half results

33% W41% D26% L
45
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results

41% W30% D30% L
30
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Bhayangkara - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.403.00
Goals scored / match0.61.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference-1+8
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
PSIM Yogyakarta - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Bhayangkara
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
5
2
16-30
7
10
31-45
7
3
46-60
2
7
61-75
10
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

PSIM Yogyakarta
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
4
16-30
7
7
31-45
5
5
46-60
11
5
61-75
9
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.55
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-61%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Bhayangkara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.77
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

PSIM Yogyakarta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.41
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

BhayangkaraLigaPSIM Yogyakarta
Average goals in match 2.482.73 2.63
Both teams scored 52%56% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%53% 52%
Clean sheets 30%26% 33%
Goal before half-time 85%70% 52%
Goal after half-time 78%83% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.73
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.56
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. BhayangkaraGoalNehar SadikiAssist: Moussa Sidibé
  2. BhayangkaraGoalMoussa SidibéAssist: Moisés Wolschick
  3. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardReva Adi Utama
  4. PSIM YogyakartaSubstitutionOn: Andi IrfanOff: Reva Adi Utama
  5. BhayangkaraYellow cardSho Yamamoto
  6. PSIM YogyakartaSubstitutionOn: Muhammad Rendra Teddy WijanarkoOff: Andy Setyo Nugroho
  7. BhayangkaraYellow cardMoisés Wolschick

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Candra CandraMatches officiated: 12
4.5Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 283%Home wins17%Draws0%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Bhayangkara 0 - 0 - 1 PSIM Yogyakarta. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Bhayangkara vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

The Liga 1 match finished Bhayangkara 2:1 PSIM Yogyakarta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Bhayangkara vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

Bhayangkara score 1.33 goals per game on average and PSIM Yogyakarta 1.33. The Liga 1 average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Bhayangkara's matches and 52% of PSIM Yogyakarta's.

What form are Bhayangkara and PSIM Yogyakarta in?

Over the last 5 games Bhayangkara have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and PSIM Yogyakarta 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bhayangkara vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.