Bidco United vs Kariobangi Sharks: match statistics
Bidco United vs Kariobangi Sharks: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Bidco United played Kariobangi Sharks in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match was played on 18 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Bidco United: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Kariobangi Sharks: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Bidco United scores 0.57 and concedes 1.18 goals per match. Kariobangi Sharks scores 0.71 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.02 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Bidco United 36%, Kariobangi Sharks 43%. Over 2.5: Bidco United 32%, Kariobangi Sharks 29%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 34%.
xG, shots and style
Kariobangi Sharks has higher xG: 1.36 vs 1.24. Bidco United: 7.8 shots per match, Kariobangi Sharks: 9.1.
Match halves
Bidco United: half-time lead 4%, second-half goals 0.14. Kariobangi Sharks: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.11.
Goals by minute
Bidco United: 0-15 (11 goals). Kariobangi Sharks: 0-15 (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Kenyan Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 34%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win ('2') because Kariobangi Sharks have a superior goals record and a smaller negative goal differential: 20 goals scored versus 16 for Bidco United and goal difference -3 vs -7. In chance creation the visitors also edge it — Sharks’ away xG is 1.39 vs the home xG of 1.29, and the visitors average 3.43 shots on target and 9.93 attempts per match compared to Bidco’s 2.31 on target and 8 attempts; conversion rate is 7% vs 6%. Defensively Sharks perform better: they concede 0.93 goals on average away, while the hosts concede 1.07 at home, and the hosts fail to score in 57% of home matches vs Sharks’ 50% of away matches without scoring. In the last 5 matches the hosts have 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses (0.4 points per match), while the visitors have 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses (0.8 points per match), confirming a slight advantage for the Sharks. Based on these numbers I give the visitors a 45% chance, a draw 30% and the hosts 25%, because advantages in xG (1.39 vs 1.29), shots on target (3.43 vs 2.31) and lower average goals conceded (0.93 vs 1.07) favor Kariobangi.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS rates are 46% for Bidco and 43% for Kariobangi, with a league average of 44%, indicating a moderate inclination toward both teams scoring. However, in the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS at only 20% and Bidco has averaged 0.2 goals (1 goal in 5 matches) while Kariobangi has averaged 1.0 goal (5 goals total), suggesting Bidco is most often the team not scoring. Additionally, Bidco averages 0.77 goals scored and 1.08 conceded per season, and Kariobangi 0.71 scored and 0.93 conceded, with a league goals average of 2.01 and a very high clean sheet rate of 70%, which increases the likelihood that one side will keep a clean sheet. xG stats show 1.30 xG for Bidco and 1.39 for Kariobangi with xG against of 1.23 and 1.44, and lower conversion rates (10% vs 7%) and low shots on target numbers (2.92 and 3.43) confirm that actual goals are below expected and BTTS is less likely. Taking all this into account I pick 'No' (No Goal) with a confidence of 70% vs 30%, because recent form and the high clean sheet share more strongly support no both teams to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The teams’ average xG are 1.30 (Bidco) and 1.39 (Kariobangi), totaling 2.69 xG, while actual average goals scored are only 0.77 and 0.71 (total 1.48). In the last 5 matches Bidco has scored 1 goal overall (0.2 per game) and Kariobangi 5 goals (1.0 per game), so blending xG and actual returns I expect about 2.08 goals (1.03 for the home side, 1.05 for the visitors). Season shares of matches over 2.5 are 31% for Bidco and 29% for Kariobangi (avg. 30%), which strongly supports Under 2.5 (~70%). Over 1.5 occurred in 54% and 50% of their games, so Over 1.5 is moderately likely (~58%), whereas Over 3.5 is unlikely (~8%). Additionally shot conversion is 10.0% for the home team and 7.0% for the away team with an average of 2.92 and 3.43 shots on target respectively, which confirms a moderate number of goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Both teams have a very low first-half goals average — home 0.25, away 0.25 — and in the last 5 matches both recorded 0.0 goals before the break; additionally the home side were level at the break in 50% of matches and the away side in 63%, which strongly points to a draw at half-time. For full-time I back a draw (X/X 36%) because the xG of both teams is similar (1.30 versus 1.39) but conversion is poor: the home team scores 0.77 goals on average, the away team 0.71, and their seasonal BTTS rates are only 46% and 43%. The strongest alternative is a Half-Time draw and an away turnaround (X/2 18%), since the away team averages 0.75 second-half goals versus 0.25 for the home team and 38% of the away team’s matches exceed 1.5 goals after the break. Scenarios with a lead at the break are less likely — the home side led at the break in 25% of matches, the away side in 13% — hence an overall weight for 1/* set at ~25% and for 2/* at ~15%. Based on the above figures I pick “X/X” as the primary tip, because the strongest signal is a draw at half-time and at full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Bidco United | Kariobangi Sharks | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kariobangi Sharks is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - Bidco United · 0.8 pts / match - Kariobangi Sharks
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kariobangi Sharks is 25% better for: goals scored per match.
0.57 goals / match - Bidco United · 0.71 goals / match - Kariobangi Sharks
Kariobangi Sharks is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.18 goals / match - Bidco United · 1 goals / match - Kariobangi Sharks
Bidco United scores in 46% of matches (13 of 28 matches), while Kariobangi Sharks keeps a clean sheet in 39% (11 of 28 matches).
Kariobangi Sharks scores in 57% of matches (16 of 28 matches), while Bidco United keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bidco United
Over / Under - Kariobangi Sharks
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bidco United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 4% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Kariobangi Sharks - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (27). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (16 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (20). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Bidco United
Kariobangi Sharks
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Bidco United | Liga | Kariobangi Sharks | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.75 | 2.02 | ▼ 1.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 43% | • 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 32% | 34% | ▼ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 32% | 36% | ▲ 39% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 14% | 21% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 18% | 22% | ▼ 14% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Bidco United 0 - 0 - 1 Kariobangi Sharks. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Bidco United vs Kariobangi Sharks?
The Kenyan Premier League match finished Bidco United 0:0 Kariobangi Sharks. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Bidco United vs Kariobangi Sharks?
Bidco United score 0.57 goals per game on average and Kariobangi Sharks 0.71. The Kenyan Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Bidco United's matches and 43% of Kariobangi Sharks's.
What form are Bidco United and Kariobangi Sharks in?
Over the last 5 games Bidco United have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Kariobangi Sharks 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bidco United vs Kariobangi Sharks?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Bidco United vs Kariobangi Sharks: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


