Bijelo Brdo vs Opatija: match statistics
Bijelo Brdo vs Opatija: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Bijelo Brdo played Opatija in Druga HNL (Croatia). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Bijelo Brdo: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Opatija: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Bijelo Brdo scores 0.93 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Opatija scores 0.75 and concedes 1.18. League average: 2.28 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Bijelo Brdo 25%, Opatija 39%. Over 2.5: Bijelo Brdo 25%, Opatija 32%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 41%.
xG, shots and style
Bijelo Brdo has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.16. Bijelo Brdo: 10.2 shots per match, Opatija: 8.4.
Match halves
Bijelo Brdo: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.68. Opatija: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.29.
Goals by minute
Bijelo Brdo: 76-90+ (8 goals). Opatija: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Druga HNL: 2.28 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 41%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Bijelo Brdo possesses a clear defensive and chance-quality advantage: at home they concede only 0.38 goals per game on average and keep a clean sheet in 77% of matches, whereas Opatija concede 1.36 goals away and have a 29% clean sheet rate. In attack the hosts average 1.23 goals at home with 12.38 shots and 5.08 shots on target and an average xG of 1.66, while Opatija record only 0.43 goals away with 8.93 shots (2.93 on target) and xG 1.15; additionally the visitors fail to score in 57% of away matches compared to 31% for the hosts. In the shorter term Bijelo have scored 4 goals in their last 5 matches (form 2-1-2, 1.4 pts/game), while Opatija have 7 goals in their last 5 (form 2-2-1, 1.6 pts/game), which indicates better point form for the visitors but not translating into away effectiveness. Considering 54% home win rate for the hosts versus 14% away win rate for Opatija, plus advantages in xG (1.66 vs 1.15) and shots on target (5.08 vs 2.93), I predict a Bijelo Brdo win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project BTTS - Yes (60%) — hosts have a seasonal BTTS rate of 50% vs guests 29%, league average is 43%, and in the last 5 meetings both teams produced BTTS in 40% of games. Creation metrics support this: xG is 1.17 for Bijelo Brdo and 1.15 for Opatija, indicating a similar number of chances created, while xG against is higher for the visitors 1.46 vs 1.28 for the hosts, so chances arise at both ends. Opatija has a low season average goals scored of 0.43, but in the last 5 matches they averaged 1.4 goals (7 in 5) vs Bijelo Brdo 0.8 (4 in 5), meaning the visitors have been scoring more recently. Additionally, Bijelo Brdo are more efficient in finishing (conversion rate 14% vs 5% for Opatija) and average 7.93 shots per game vs 8.93 for the visitors, while clean sheets are rare: 21% for the hosts and 29% for the away side. Considering these comparisons (xG, last 5 matches and low clean sheet rates), the signal favors Both Teams To Score, hence a preference for "yes".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
A model combining attack xG and opponent xG (Bijelo Brdo attack xG 1.17 vs xG against Opatija 1.46; Opatija attack xG 1.15 vs xG against Bijelo Brdo 1.28) yields expected goals of 1.32 for the home side and 1.21 for the away side, totaling 2.53. A Poisson distribution with mean 2.53 estimates ~72% probability for Over 1.5 goals, ~47% for Over 2.5 and ~25% for Over 3.5; these outcomes align with seasonal stats: Bijelo Brdo has Over 1.5 in 71% of matches, Opatija in 64%. For the 2.5 line signals are mixed: Bijelo Brdo records Over 2.5 in 43% of games, Opatija only 21%, league average 41% — xG implies ~47% probability here, so the bet is risky. The strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5 (72%), therefore I recommend backing the Over line at 1.5 as the best option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Bijelo Brdo holds a clear seasonal advantage: on average 1.07 goals per match versus 0.43 for Opatija, and 1.36 points per match at home compared to 0.79 points per match away for Opatija. At Half-Time hosts most often record a draw — Bijelo Brdo was level at the break in 64% of home games, with average half-time goals of 0.71 for the hosts versus 0.21 for the visitors. Despite similar xG (1.17 vs 1.15), the hosts convert chances far better (14% vs 5%) and score more frequently in the second half (on average 0.36 goals versus 0.21 for the visitors), which increases their chances of a turnaround after Half-Time. Therefore the most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a Bijelo Brdo victory at Full-Time (X/1 — 34%). Alternatives are draw/draw (14%) or the hosts leading at the break and holding on to win (1/1 — 18%), while options with the visitors leading or winning are assessed as unlikely (total 14%) due to only 14% away wins for Opatija and an average of 0.43 goals scored per away match.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Bijelo Brdo | Opatija | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Opatija is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Bijelo Brdo · 1.6 pts / match - Opatija
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Bijelo Brdo is 24% better for: goals scored per match.
0.93 goals / match - Bijelo Brdo · 0.75 goals / match - Opatija
Bijelo Brdo is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.93 goals / match - Bijelo Brdo · 1.18 goals / match - Opatija
Bijelo Brdo scores in 54% of matches (15 of 28 matches), while Opatija keeps a clean sheet in 25% (7 of 28 matches).
Opatija scores in 54% of matches (15 of 28 matches), while Bijelo Brdo keeps a clean sheet in 39% (11 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bijelo Brdo
Over / Under - Opatija
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Opatija is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.96 pts / match - Bijelo Brdo · 1.14 pts / match - Opatija
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bijelo Brdo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Opatija - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Bijelo Brdo
Opatija
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Druga HNL).
Teams vs league
| Bijelo Brdo | Liga | Opatija | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.86 | 2.28 | ▼ 1.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 25% | 43% | ▼ 39% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 25% | 41% | ▼ 32% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 39% | 32% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | • 68% | 67% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 75% | • 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Bijelo Brdo 2 - 0 - 0 Opatija. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Bijelo Brdo vs Opatija?
The Druga HNL match finished Bijelo Brdo 0:0 Opatija. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Bijelo Brdo and Opatija?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Bijelo Brdo won 2, Opatija won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Bijelo Brdo vs Opatija?
Bijelo Brdo score 0.93 goals per game on average and Opatija 0.75. The Druga HNL average is 2.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Bijelo Brdo's matches and 39% of Opatija's.
What form are Bijelo Brdo and Opatija in?
Over the last 5 games Bijelo Brdo have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Opatija 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bijelo Brdo vs Opatija?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Bijelo Brdo vs Opatija: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


