England - ChampionshipSt. Andrew's StadiumData current as of 19 October 2026

Birmingham City vs Wolverhampton Wanderers: match statistics

Birmingham City vs Wolverhampton Wanderers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Birmingham City played Wolverhampton Wanderers in Championship (England). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Venue: St. Andrew's Stadium. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Birmingham City: 1-3-0, 1.50 points/match. Wolverhampton Wanderers: 2-1-1, 1.75 points/match.

Goal statistics

Birmingham City scores 1.25 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Wolverhampton Wanderers scores 2.75 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.85 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Birmingham City 75%, Wolverhampton Wanderers 100%. Over 2.5: Birmingham City 50%, Wolverhampton Wanderers 100%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 64%.

xG, shots and style

Wolverhampton Wanderers has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.24. Birmingham City: 10.8 shots per match, Wolverhampton Wanderers: 17.5.

Match halves

Birmingham City: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.75. Wolverhampton Wanderers: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.50.

Goals by minute

Birmingham City: 0-15 (1 goals). Wolverhampton Wanderers: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Championship: 2.85 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 64%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Wolverhampton Wanderers sit higher in the table, in 5th place compared with Birmingham in 8th, and have collected 10 points from their last five matches thanks to 3 wins, while the hosts have managed only 6 points. The visitors have been impressive in front of goal: they have scored 13 goals in their last five games and average 2.5 goals per away match, with an xG of 1.64. Birmingham are unbeaten at home, but both of their matches so far have ended in draws, while their average xG of 1.34 is lower than their opponents’ figure. Wolves also create more chances, averaging 16.5 shots and 4 on target away from home, compared with Birmingham’s 12 shots and 3 on target at home. Neither defence is particularly solid — the hosts concede an average of 1.5 goals at home, while the visitors concede 2.5 away — so Birmingham should have a chance to score, but the greater attacking potential points to the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have a 100% BTTS rate this season, and neither has kept a clean sheet or failed to score in a match yet. Birmingham average 3.0 goals scored and 1.5 conceded, while Wolverhampton average 2.5 goals scored and 2.5 conceded per match. The current form also strongly supports BTTS - Yes: in their last five matches, BTTS occurred in 80% of cases for each team, with Birmingham conceding an average of 2.0 goals and Wolves 1.6. Their attacking potential is confirmed by xG figures of 1.88 for the hosts and 1.64 for the visitors, while Wolverhampton have scored as many as 13 goals in their last five matches. Even Birmingham’s weaker recent average of 1.2 goals and an xG of 1.15 is supported by the visitors’ defence, which concedes 1.6 goals per match, making it more likely that both teams will score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The profile of both teams clearly favors goals: in the current competition, the average number of goals in Birmingham matches is 4.5, compared with 5.0 for Wolverhampton. Each team has surpassed the 1.5-goal and 2.5-goal lines in 100% of matches so far, while both have regularly scored and conceded at least one goal. In their last five matches, Wolverhampton averaged 2.6 goals scored, while Birmingham conceded 2.0, significantly increasing the visitors’ attacking potential. The hosts have averaged 1.15 xG over their last five appearances, while their opponents allow 1.25 xG, making a goal for Birmingham a realistic scenario as well. Over 1.5 goals has the strongest statistical backing, as the expected total of 3.20 goals provides a substantial margin even if the match is less open than the teams’ previous fixtures.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Wolverhampton are showing clearly better current form: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with just 1 win for Birmingham, while their average goals scored stand at 2.6 and 1.2 respectively. The visitors led at the break in 60% of their recent matches and averaged 1.4 goals scored before half-time, whereas the hosts took the lead in only 20% of cases, scoring 0.6 goals in this phase. Birmingham conceded an average of 1.0 goals before half-time, compared with 0.8 for Wolves, further strengthening the scenario of an away advantage in the first half. After the interval, Wolves still have the more favourable record, averaging 1.2 goals scored and recording a positive goal difference of +2 in their last five appearances, compared with Birmingham’s 0.6 goals. The most likely outcome is therefore a Wolverhampton lead at half-time followed by a win at full-time: HT/FT 2/2.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
15Shots10
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
5Shots on target4
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
1.9xG1.1
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
8Corners4
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
84Dangerous attacks26
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
17Fouls12
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
2Cards1
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
1.25Goals scored / match2.75
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
1Goals conceded / match2
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
49%Average possession55%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
3Shots on target / match4.75
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.75Shots per match17.5
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
3Shots on target4.75
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
11.6%Shot conversion15.7%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
49%Possession55%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
1.24xG for1.78
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
1.16xG against1.26
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers

Shooting quality

Birmingham City: BalancedWolverhampton Wanderers: Dominant
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
Accuracy (shots on target)28%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.58

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Wolverhampton Wanderers is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.5 pts / match - Birmingham City · 1.75 pts / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers

Birmingham City
DDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
25% W75% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-0
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-0
1.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-0
Last 5 at home
0-2-0
DD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.3Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 50%
Wolverhampton Wanderers
DWWL
Season result split
50% W25% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Wolverhampton Wanderers is 120% better for: goals scored per match.

1.25 goals / match - Birmingham City · 2.75 goals / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers

Birmingham City is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Birmingham City · 2 goals / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers

Birmingham City scoring profile: very strong

Birmingham City scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Wolverhampton Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

Wolverhampton Wanderers scoring profile: very strong

Wolverhampton Wanderers scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Birmingham City keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

5Goals scored (season)11
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
4Goals conceded (season)8
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
2.25Average goals in match4.75
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
5Goals scored (last 5)11
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal100%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
50%2 goals100%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
0%3 goals50%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
0%4 goals25%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal100%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
25%2 goals50%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
0%3 goals25%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
0%4 goals25%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

100%
Wolverhampton Wanderers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.4 of 4 matches
66%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time75%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
25%BTTS in both halves50%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
50%Scored in both halves100%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
75%BTTS - last 5100%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time75%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time50%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Wolverhampton Wanderers is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - Birmingham City · 1.75 pts / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers

Birmingham City - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing
Wolverhampton Wanderers - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)1.75
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
0.5Goals scored (1st half)1.25
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)1
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
1Average goals (1st half)2.25
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
50%Clean sheet before half-time25%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
50%No goal before half-time0%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1.75
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)1.5
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
1.25Average goals (2nd half)2.5
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
50%Clean sheet after half-time25%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers
25%No goal after half-time0%
Birmingham CityWolverhampton Wanderers

Birmingham City - second-half results

25% W75% D0% L
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Wolverhampton Wanderers - second-half results

50% W25% D25% L
7
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Birmingham City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.251.50
Goals scored / match0.50.8
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match1.01.3
1 goal75%75%
2 goals25%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal50%25%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 25% leading - 50% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 75% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 2
Wolverhampton Wanderers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.751.75
Goals scored / match1.31.5
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match2.32.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals75%100%
3 goals50%50%
Clean sheet25%25%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 50% leading - 25% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 25% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 75% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Birmingham City
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Wolverhampton Wanderers
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
3
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
1
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
123%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
88%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Birmingham City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Wolverhampton Wanderers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.97
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.74
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
220%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
126%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).

Teams vs league

Birmingham CityLigaWolverhampton Wanderers
Average goals in match▼ 2.252.85▲ 4.75
Both teams scored▲ 75%66%▲ 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%64%▲ 100%
Clean sheets▲ 25%21%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▼ 75%80%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time• 75%76%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.85
Average goals per match
66%
Both teams scored
64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.59
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Wolverhampton WanderersGoalFernando López GonzálezAssist: Rodrigo Martins Gomes
  2. Birmingham CityGoalJay StansfieldAssist: Patrick Roberts
  3. Wolverhampton WanderersGoalLadislav KrejčíAssist: André Trindade da Costa Neto
  4. Wolverhampton WanderersGoalJackson Tchatchoua
  5. Wolverhampton WanderersYellow cardMarshall Nyasha Munetsi
  6. Birmingham CityYellow cardChristoph Klarer
  7. Birmingham CityYellow cardPhil Neumann
  8. Birmingham CitySubstitutionOn: Demarai Ramelle GrayOff: Liam Millar
  9. Wolverhampton WanderersSubstitutionOn: Thomas DoyleOff: Raúl Alonso Jiménez Rodríguez
  10. Birmingham CitySubstitutionOn: Ethan LairdOff: Demarai Ramelle Gray

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Birmingham City vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?

The Championship match finished Birmingham City 2:2 Wolverhampton Wanderers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Birmingham City vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?

Birmingham City score 1.25 goals per game on average and Wolverhampton Wanderers 2.75. The Championship average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Birmingham City's matches and 100% of Wolverhampton Wanderers's.

What form are Birmingham City and Wolverhampton Wanderers in?

Over the last 5 games Birmingham City have a 1-3-0 record (1.50 points per game) and Wolverhampton Wanderers 2-1-1 (1.75 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Birmingham City vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Birmingham City vs Wolverhampton Wanderers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.