United States - USL ChampionshipBBVA Compass FieldData current as of 23 October 2026

Birmingham Legion vs Charleston Battery: match statistics

Birmingham Legion vs Charleston Battery: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Birmingham Legion played Charleston Battery in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: BBVA Compass Field. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Birmingham Legion: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Charleston Battery: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Birmingham Legion scores 1.24 and concedes 1.52 goals per match. Charleston Battery scores 2.04 and concedes 1.26. League average: 2.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Birmingham Legion 71%, Charleston Battery 48%. Over 2.5: Birmingham Legion 52%, Charleston Battery 61%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Charleston Battery has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.38. Birmingham Legion: 12.1 shots per match, Charleston Battery: 12.9.

Match halves

Birmingham Legion: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.57. Charleston Battery: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 1.09.

Goals by minute

Birmingham Legion: 16-30 (7 goals). Charleston Battery: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-4. Average goals 2.20, BTTS 40%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Charleston Battery sit 4th, while Birmingham Legion are 22nd. Over their last five matches, the visitors have recorded 3 wins and conceded just 5 goals, compared with 1 win and 11 goals conceded by the hosts. Charleston’s superiority over the course of the season is clear: they have scored 47 goals and conceded 29, while Birmingham’s record stands at 26:32. However, the match could be closely contested due to Battery’s poor away form, with defeats in 58% of their away matches, an average of 1.67 goals conceded, and no goals scored in 42% of their away appearances. Legion draw as many as 45% of their home matches, and their average xG is 1.51, slightly higher than Charleston’s 1.24 away from home. The hosts should therefore create enough chances to exploit the visitors’ defensive instability, but Charleston’s better current form limits Legion’s chances of securing a win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes is primarily supported by Birmingham Legion’s current defensive form, having conceded 11 goals in their last 5 matches—an average of 2.2 per game—with a very high conceded xG of 2.48. Over the same period, Charleston Battery averaged 2.0 goals scored and generated 1.51 xG, giving them a solid foundation to exploit the hosts’ defensive weakness. Birmingham are also highly dangerous going forward: their season data shows an average of 3.0 goals scored, 1.98 xG created, and 7.45 shots on target per match, while Charleston concede an average of 1.67 goals. BTTS landed in 80% of Birmingham’s last five matches, and their average goals conceded is notably higher than Charleston’s recent figure of 1.0 goal conceded per game. The risk to the Yes outcome is Charleston’s low season BTTS rate of 33%, along with the fact that they have failed to score in 42% of their matches. However, the visitors’ current attacking form shifts the prediction toward both teams scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Birmingham has developed a very strong attacking profile at home: it averages 3.00 goals scored, generates an xG of 1.98, and records 7.45 shots on target per match. Charleston concedes an average of 1.67 goals away from home, while its average xG conceded stands at 1.49, which supports the expectation of at least two goals for the hosts. In their last five matches, Birmingham scored 9 goals but also conceded 11, while Charleston netted 10 goals during the same period. The 1.5 line was surpassed in 100% of Birmingham’s matches and 75% of Charleston’s, making Over 1.5 goals the market with by far the strongest statistical backing. The higher 2.5 line also appears positive, but Charleston’s greater volatility and just 50% of such matches on its side reduce its level of confidence.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Birmingham Legion has a very strong home-season profile: they win 73% of their matches, score an average of 3.00 goals, and concede just 0.82. The hosts led at the break in 8 of 11 home matches (73%), scoring 1.45 goals per game before half-time, while Charleston averages only 0.50 goals in this period away from home. Birmingham’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average xG is 1.98 compared with 1.24 for the visitors, while shots on target stand at 7.45 versus 3.42. After the break, the hosts add an average of 1.55 goals, whereas Charleston concedes 1.17, favouring the maintenance or extension of an early lead. Charleston has collected more points across the last five matches, with a 60% win rate compared with Birmingham’s 20%, so the draw-at-half-time and either-side-to-win scenarios remain significantly elevated; however, the overall home profile still points most strongly to 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

35Possession (%)65
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
8Shots11
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
2Shots on target6
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
0.95xG1.64
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
1Corners6
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
41Dangerous attacks71
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
9Fouls17
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
2Cards1
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
1.24Goals scored / match2.04
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
1.52Goals conceded / match1.26
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
49%Average possession56%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
3.57Shots on target / match5.35
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.1Shots per match12.91
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
3.57Shots on target5.35
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
10.2%Shot conversion15.8%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
49%Possession56%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
1.38xG for1.58
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
1.89xG against1.3
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery

Shooting quality

Birmingham Legion: BalancedCharleston Battery: Efficient finishing
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
Accuracy (shots on target)30%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Charleston Battery is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Birmingham Legion · 1.8 pts / match - Charleston Battery

Birmingham Legion
WLLLD
Season result split
14% W43% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-9-9
0.86 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-5-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 2.48BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Charleston Battery
WLWWL
Season result split
52% W13% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-3-8
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-7
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Charleston Battery is 65% better for: goals scored per match.

1.24 goals / match - Birmingham Legion · 2.04 goals / match - Charleston Battery

Charleston Battery is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.52 goals / match - Birmingham Legion · 1.26 goals / match - Charleston Battery

Birmingham Legion scoring profile: very strong

Birmingham Legion scores in 81% of matches (17 of 21 matches), while Charleston Battery keeps a clean sheet in 30% (7 of 23 matches).

Charleston Battery scoring profile: very strong

Charleston Battery scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while Birmingham Legion keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 matches).

26Goals scored (season)47
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
32Goals conceded (season)29
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
2.76Average goals in match3.3
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
9Goals scored (last 5)10
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
11Goals conceded (last 5)5
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal78%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
38%2 goals52%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
5%3 goals30%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
0%4 goals26%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal70%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
52%2 goals39%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
19%3 goals13%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
0%4 goals4%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

71%
Birmingham Legion - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.15 of 21 matches
48%
Charleston Battery - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 23 matches
55%
League average

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time13%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
14%BTTS in both halves4%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
24%Scored in both halves39%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS22%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
80%BTTS - last 540%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time96%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time61%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time35%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Charleston Battery is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / match - Birmingham Legion · 1.78 pts / match - Charleston Battery

Birmingham Legion - half-time state
19% leading71% draw10% trailing
Charleston Battery - half-time state
48% leading35% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)1.78
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.96
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
0.52Goals conceded (1st half)0.39
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
1.19Average goals (1st half)1.35
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
52%Clean sheet before half-time74%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
43%No goal before half-time48%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery

After half-time (2nd half)

0.81Points per match (2nd half)1.61
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)1.09
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.87
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
1.57Average goals (2nd half)1.96
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
33%Clean sheet after half-time39%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery
52%No goal after half-time35%
Birmingham LegionCharleston Battery

Birmingham Legion - second-half results

14% W38% D48% L
27
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding74%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 14%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Charleston Battery - second-half results

48% W17% D35% L
41
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.78
PPG before half-time
Lead holding108%

Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Birmingham Legion - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.4
Average goals in match1.62.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
Charleston Battery - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.80
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Birmingham Legion
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
7
2
16-30
5
6
31-45
4
5
46-60
2
4
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Charleston Battery
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
9
4
16-30
8
2
31-45
9
4
46-60
5
7
61-75
11
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.03
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Birmingham Legion

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
127%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Charleston Battery

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
170%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Birmingham LegionLigaCharleston Battery
Average goals in match• 2.762.71▲ 3.30
Both teams scored▲ 71%55%▼ 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 52%49%▲ 61%
Clean sheets▼ 19%27%▲ 30%
Goal before half-time▲ 67%64%• 65%
Goal after half-time▲ 81%79%▲ 96%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.71
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.51
Home goals / match
1.20
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Birmingham LegionGoalSebastian TregarthenAssist: Bryce Washington
  2. Charleston BatteryGoalMiguel Berry
  3. Birmingham LegionYellow cardRomario Williams
  4. Charleston BatteryGoalMiguel BerryAssist: Jeremy Kelley
  5. Birmingham LegionYellow cardKadeem Coles Martínez
  6. Charleston BatteryYellow cardJeremy Kelley
  7. Birmingham LegionGoalRomario WilliamsAssist: Tyler Pasher
  8. Birmingham LegionSubstitutionOn: Phanuel KavitaOff: Bryce Washington
  9. Charleston BatterySubstitutionOn: Andy CabreraOff: Maalique Nathanael Foster
  10. Charleston BatterySubstitutionOn: Langston BlackstockOff: Douglas Francisco Martìnez Juárez
  11. Birmingham LegionSubstitutionOn: Serge NgomaOff: Tyler Pasher

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Birmingham Legion 0 - 1 - 4 Charleston Battery. Average goals 2.20, both teams scored in 40% matches.

Charleston Battery
3 : 2
Birmingham Legion
Charleston Battery
2 : 1
Birmingham Legion FC
Birmingham Legion FC
0 : 0
Charleston Battery
Charleston Battery
2 : 0
Birmingham Legion
Birmingham Legion
0 : 1
Charleston Battery

FAQ

What was the result of Birmingham Legion vs Charleston Battery?

The USL Championship match finished Birmingham Legion 2:2 Charleston Battery. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Birmingham Legion and Charleston Battery?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Birmingham Legion won 0, Charleston Battery won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Birmingham Legion vs Charleston Battery?

Birmingham Legion score 1.24 goals per game on average and Charleston Battery 2.04. The USL Championship average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Birmingham Legion's matches and 48% of Charleston Battery's.

What form are Birmingham Legion and Charleston Battery in?

Over the last 5 games Birmingham Legion have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Charleston Battery 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Birmingham Legion vs Charleston Battery?

The statistical background for Birmingham Legion vs Charleston Battery — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.