Bistrica vs Tabor Sežana: match statistics
Bistrica vs Tabor Sežana: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Bistrica played Tabor Sežana in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 12 April 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Bistrica: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Tabor Sežana: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Bistrica scores 1.73 and concedes 1.09 goals per match. Tabor Sežana scores 1.41 and concedes 0.77. League average: 2.78 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Bistrica 41%, Tabor Sežana 36%. Over 2.5: Bistrica 55%, Tabor Sežana 36%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Tabor Sežana has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.43. Bistrica: 10.2 shots per match, Tabor Sežana: 13.3.
Match halves
Bistrica: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.82. Tabor Sežana: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.82.
Goals by minute
Bistrica: 31-45+ (9 goals). Tabor Sežana: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.78 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorite appears to be Tabor Sežana: the visitors have 14 wins this season versus Bistrica’s 9 and sit 3rd compared to 6th, indicating superiority in results. In their last five matches Tabor has 3 wins and 2 draws (averaging 2.2 points per match), while Bistrica has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses (averaging 1.0 point). The visitors’ away metrics are strong — on average 5.55 shots on target and xG 1.74 away, versus Bistrica’s 4.55 shots on target and xG 1.48 at home; additionally Tabor has 55% clean sheets on the road compared to the hosts’ 36%. Bistrica offsets this with home efficiency: averaging 2.18 goals scored with a 20% conversion rate and a +12 goal difference in home matches, but overall better form, more chances and a lower share of matches without a goal (9% for Tabor vs 18% for Bistrica) argue in favor of the visitors’ win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The 'no' scenario (i.e., at least one team fails to score) is more likely, as Bistrica concedes only 0.36 goals per game this season and keeps a clean sheet in 64% of matches, with a season BTTS rate of just 27%. Conversely, xG indicates both sides create chances (xG 1.74 each) and Tabor records 5.55 shots on target versus Bistrica's 4.45, with higher shot efficiency (13% vs 8%), giving the visitors a realistic scoring opportunity. However, Bistrica defends significantly better than xG suggests – xG against them is 1.19 while actual goals conceded are only 0.36 per game – which weakens the BTTS signal. In the short term the last 5 matches are more balanced: Bistrica has 60% BTTS in the last 5 with averages of 1.4 scored and 1.2 conceded, while Tabor has 40% BTTS with 1.6 scored and 0.8 conceded, providing a moderate impulse for 'yes'. After weighing the hosts' season-long defensive edge (0.36 conceded, 64% clean sheets, 27% BTTS) above the visitors' offensive signals, I assign 65% to 'no' and 35% to 'yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Average xG values point to high goal potential: both teams have xG for of 1.74, with xG conceded 1.19 for Bistrica and 1.43 for Tabor, yielding expected goals ≈1.59 (home) and ≈1.46 (away), total ≈3.05. Seasonal profiles diverge — Bistrica scores 1.09 goals at home on average, keeps 64% clean sheets and only 9% Over 2.5 matches, while Tabor away averages 1.73 goals, records 64% Over 2.5 matches and 36% Over 3.5. In the last 5 rounds Bistrica scored 7 goals (1.4/match) and conceded 6 (1.2/match), and Tabor scored 8 (1.6/match) and conceded 4 (0.8/match), which together yield an average of 3.0 goals per match. With λ=3.05 from a Poisson model we estimate: Over 1.5 ≈82%, Over 2.5 ≈60% and Over 3.5 ≈36%, consistent with high xG for both sides and the visitors’ seasonal tendency toward higher-scoring games. Therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (pick: over, line 1.5) with an estimated probability of ~82%, while Over 2.5 remains a moderate-probability option (~60%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Half-time statistics favor the visitors: Tabor Sežana led at the break in 6 matches (55%) versus 3 (27%) for the hosts, with average first-half goals of 0.73 for the visitors compared to 0.45 for Bistrica. In the last 5 fixtures the visitors have a 60% win rate (dwdww) versus 20% for the hosts (wlddl), indicating superior form for Tabor. Although the hosts concede only 0.36 goals per match on average and allow less xG (1.19 vs 1.43), the attacking xG for both teams is 1.74 and the visitors have a higher shot conversion rate (13% vs 8%), which favors them in turning chances into goals. In the second half the visitors score on average 1.00 and concede 0.55, while the hosts score 0.64 and concede 0.18, so Tabor more often preserves or extends a lead after the break. On this basis my strongest signal is HT/FT 2/2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Bistrica | Tabor Sežana | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Tabor Sežana is 120% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Bistrica · 2.2 pts / match - Tabor Sežana
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Bistrica is 23% better for: goals scored per match.
1.73 goals / match - Bistrica · 1.41 goals / match - Tabor Sežana
Tabor Sežana is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.09 goals / match - Bistrica · 0.77 goals / match - Tabor Sežana
Bistrica scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while Tabor Sežana keeps a clean sheet in 59% (13 of 22 matches).
Tabor Sežana scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while Bistrica keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bistrica
Over / Under - Tabor Sežana
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tabor Sežana is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.41 pts / match - Bistrica · 1.64 pts / match - Tabor Sežana
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bistrica - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Tabor Sežana - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Bistrica
Tabor Sežana
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Bistrica | Liga | Tabor Sežana | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.82 | 2.78 | ▼ 2.18 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 41% | 49% | ▼ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 55% | 53% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 29% | ▲ 59% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 86% | 74% | ▼ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 80% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- BistricaGoalLluc Carrera Sánchez
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Bistrica 0 - 0 - 1 Tabor Sežana. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Bistrica vs Tabor Sežana?
The 2. SNL match finished Bistrica 2:1 Tabor Sežana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Bistrica vs Tabor Sežana?
Bistrica score 1.73 goals per game on average and Tabor Sežana 1.41. The 2. SNL average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Bistrica's matches and 36% of Tabor Sežana's.
What form are Bistrica and Tabor Sežana in?
Over the last 5 games Bistrica have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Tabor Sežana 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bistrica vs Tabor Sežana?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


