Armenia - Armenian Premier LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

BKMA vs Shirak: match statistics

BKMA crest
BKMA
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Shirak crest
Shirak

BKMA vs Shirak: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

BKMA played Shirak in Armenian Premier League (Armenia). The match was played on 12 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

BKMA: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Shirak: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

BKMA scores 1.11 and concedes 1.63 goals per match. Shirak scores 0.72 and concedes 1.89. League average: 2.56 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: BKMA 58%, Shirak 39%. Over 2.5: BKMA 58%, Shirak 50%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

BKMA has higher xG: 1.23 vs 0.95. BKMA: 10.9 shots per match, Shirak: 7.7.

Match halves

BKMA: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.63. Shirak: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.39.

Goals by minute

BKMA: 61-75 (6 goals). Shirak: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Armenian Premier League: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

BKMA has a clear home advantage: on average 1.1 goals per game with xG 1.28 and 11.3 shots (3.4 on target), while Shirak score only 0.56 goals away with xG 0.92 and 7.44 shots (2.67 on target). Defensively the hosts concede 1.2 goals per home game with average xG against 1.55, whereas the visitors allow 2.44 goals conceded away and xG against 2.24, indicating greater susceptibility of Shirak to conceding. Form corroborates this gap: BKMA have won 1 of their last 5 matches, averaging 0.6 points per game in that period, while Shirak have lost all 5, with 0 points and 0 goals scored in their last five. Additionally BKMA have higher shot efficiency (conversion rate 10% vs 7%) and less frequently finish matches goalless (40% of matches vs 56% for Shirak), therefore I favor the home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back No BTTS because Shirak have failed to score in their last 5 matches (0 goals) and have a 0% BTTS rate in those five games, which is the strongest signal against BTTS. Shirak average 0.56 goals scored and concede 2.44 per game this season, with a season xG of 0.92; in the last 5 matches their xG dropped to 0.8 and was not converted into goals. BKMA at home score on average 0.89 goals per game, have a season BTTS rate of 33% (below the league 46%) and have scored 4 and conceded 11 in their last 5 matches, indicating poor home attacking effectiveness. Although Shirak’s season BTTS rate is 44% versus the league 46%, Shirak’s zero goal output in five matches and the visitors’ low shot conversion (7%) greatly reduce the likelihood of BTTS. Based on this I estimate BTTS - Yes at ~20% and No BTTS at ~80%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project approximately 2.70 total goals in this match: BKMA ~1.48 and Shirak ~1.22. The basis is xG values: BKMA has xG_for 0.98 versus Shirak’s xG_against 2.24 (average 1.61), but BKMA’s actual scoring rate this season is only 0.89 goals and 0.8 in the last 5 matches, which adjusts the home estimate down to ~1.48. Shirak has xG_for 0.92 and the home xG_against 1.65 (average 1.29), however a low conversion rate of 7% and zero goals scored in the last 5 matches (0.0) reduce the away expectation to ~1.22. Seasonally Over 1.5 occurs in 44% of home matches and 89% of away matches, and the league average is 2.54 goals per game; additionally BKMA concedes 1.33 goals and Shirak 2.44, so I assign a strong probability to Over 1.5 (78%). I rate Over 2.5 as moderately likely (55%) given season Over 2.5: BKMA 33% vs Shirak 67% and last5 both at 40%, while Over 3.5 remains unlikely (28%) in line with seasonal 22–33% for that line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistical analysis points to a draw at half-time as the most likely scenario – BKMA were level at the break in 67% of matches and led at half-time in only 11%. In the second half the hosts score on average 0.56 goals versus 0.22 for Shirak and have scored 3 goals in the 61–75 minute window while the visitors only 1, which increases BKMA’s chances of a victory after the break. Shirak have yet to win a match this season (0% wins) and concede an average of 2.44 goals per game, with an xG of 0.92 versus the hosts’ 0.98, reducing the probability of an away win. Since the second half is goal-rich (89% of matches see at least one goal after the break for both teams) and BKMA convert chances better (11% conversion versus Shirak’s 7%), the half-time draw to home win (X/1) scenario looks strongest. I assign this combination the highest probability of 37%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

66Possession (%)34
BKMAShirak
20Shots12
BKMAShirak
6Shots on target3
BKMAShirak
2.11xG1.26
BKMAShirak
4Corners2
BKMAShirak
62Dangerous attacks42
BKMAShirak
16Fouls4
BKMAShirak
0Cards2
BKMAShirak

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.11Goals scored / match0.72
BKMAShirak
1.63Goals conceded / match1.89
BKMAShirak
51%Average possession39%
BKMAShirak
3.84Shots on target / match2.94
BKMAShirak

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.95Shots per match7.72
BKMAShirak
3.84Shots on target2.94
BKMAShirak
10.1%Shot conversion9.4%
BKMAShirak
51%Possession39%
BKMAShirak
1.23xG for0.95
BKMAShirak
1.65xG against1.95
BKMAShirak

Shooting quality

BKMA: BalancedShirak: Balanced
BKMAShirak
Accuracy (shots on target)35%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

BKMA
WLLLL
Season result split
16% W32% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-10
0.79 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
DWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 0.98Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Shirak
WLLLL
Season result split
11% W22% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-12
0.56 pts / match · goal difference -21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-6
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 0.83Opponent xG: 2.00BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

BKMA is 54% better for: goals scored per match.

1.11 goals / match - BKMA · 0.72 goals / match - Shirak

BKMA is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.63 goals / match - BKMA · 1.89 goals / match - Shirak

BKMA scoring profile: very strong

BKMA scores in 63% of matches (12 of 19 matches), while Shirak keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 matches).

Shirak scoring profile: mixed

Shirak scores in 44% of matches (8 of 18 matches), while BKMA keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 matches).

21Goals scored (season)13
BKMAShirak
31Goals conceded (season)34
BKMAShirak
2.74Average goals in match2.61
BKMAShirak
4Goals scored (last 5)1
BKMAShirak
11Goals conceded (last 5)9
BKMAShirak

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal44%
BKMAShirak
32%2 goals17%
BKMAShirak
11%3 goals6%
BKMAShirak
5%4 goals6%
BKMAShirak

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal83%
BKMAShirak
63%2 goals56%
BKMAShirak
16%3 goals33%
BKMAShirak
5%4 goals11%
BKMAShirak

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time11%
BKMAShirak
5%BTTS in both halves0%
BKMAShirak
16%Scored in both halves11%
BKMAShirak

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
BKMAShirak
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS22%
BKMAShirak
40%BTTS - last 50%
BKMAShirak

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
BKMAShirak
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
BKMAShirak
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
BKMAShirak

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
BKMAShirak
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
BKMAShirak
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
BKMAShirak

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

BKMA is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / match - BKMA · 0.89 pts / match - Shirak

BKMA - half-time state
26% leading32% draw42% trailing
Shirak - half-time state
17% leading39% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per match (1st half)0.89
BKMAShirak
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.33
BKMAShirak
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.94
BKMAShirak
1.11Average goals (1st half)1.28
BKMAShirak
47%Clean sheet before half-time44%
BKMAShirak
68%No goal before half-time78%
BKMAShirak

After half-time (2nd half)

0.95Points per match (2nd half)0.83
BKMAShirak
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.39
BKMAShirak
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.94
BKMAShirak
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.33
BKMAShirak
32%Clean sheet after half-time33%
BKMAShirak
53%No goal after half-time67%
BKMAShirak

BKMA - second-half results

21% W32% R47% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding62%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 16%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shirak - second-half results

22% W17% R61% P
16
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding65%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

BKMA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.00
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.81.4
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Shirak - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.60
Goals scored / match0.00.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-5-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

BKMA
ScoredConceded
3
8
0-15
4
2
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
7
46-60
6
5
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Shirak
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
3
5
16-30
2
7
31-45
0
4
46-60
4
8
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
21%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

BKMA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
150%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Shirak

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Armenian Premier League).

Teams vs league

BKMALigaShirak
Average goals in match 2.742.56 2.61
Both teams scored 58%46% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%49% 50%
Clean sheets 21%31% 17%
Goal before half-time 74%70% 67%
Goal after half-time 84%80% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.56
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ShirakYellow cardRudik Mkrtchyan
  2. BKMASubstitutionOn: Artur AskaryanOff: Arshak Poghosyan
  3. ShirakYellow cardSuren Tsarukyan
  4. ShirakSubstitutionOn: Grigor GumashyanOff: Donald Alvine Kodia
  5. BKMASubstitutionOn: Harutyun ManukyanOff: Petros Aleqyan

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Henrik NalbandyanMatches officiated: 13
4.54Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 215%Home wins46%Draws38%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: BKMA 1 - 0 - 0 Shirak. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Banaki Kentronakan Marzakan Akumb
2 : 1
Shirak FC

FAQ

What was the result of BKMA vs Shirak?

The Armenian Premier League match finished BKMA 0:0 Shirak. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before BKMA vs Shirak?

BKMA score 1.11 goals per game on average and Shirak 0.72. The Armenian Premier League average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 58% of BKMA's matches and 39% of Shirak's.

What form are BKMA and Shirak in?

Over the last 5 games BKMA have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Shirak 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for BKMA vs Shirak?

The statistical background for BKMA vs Shirak — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.