BKMA vs Shirak: match statistics
BKMA vs Shirak: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
BKMA play Shirak in Armenian Premier League (Armenia). The match date is 12 April 2026 at 13:30. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
BKMA: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Shirak: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
BKMA scores 1.11 and concedes 1.56 goals per match. Shirak scores 0.62 and concedes 1.81. League average: 2.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: BKMA 63%, Shirak 35%. Over 2.5: BKMA 52%, Shirak 42%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
BKMA has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.00. BKMA: 11.4 shots per match, Shirak: 8.3.
Match halves
BKMA: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.63. Shirak: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.27.
Goals by minute
BKMA: 76-90+ (7 goals). Shirak: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Armenian Premier League: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.
Match description
BKMA has a clear home advantage: on average 1.1 goals per game with xG 1.28 and 11.3 shots (3.4 on target), while Shirak score only 0.56 goals away with xG 0.92 and 7.44 shots (2.67 on target). Defensively the hosts concede 1.2 goals per home game with average xG against 1.55, whereas the visitors allow 2.44 goals conceded away and xG against 2.24, indicating greater susceptibility of Shirak to conceding. Form corroborates this gap: BKMA have won 1 of their last 5 matches, averaging 0.6 points per game in that period, while Shirak have lost all 5, with 0 points and 0 goals scored in their last five. Additionally BKMA have higher shot efficiency (conversion rate 10% vs 7%) and less frequently finish matches goalless (40% of matches vs 56% for Shirak), therefore I favor the home win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| BKMA | Shirak | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
BKMA is 400% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - BKMA · 0.2 pts / match - Shirak
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
BKMA is 79% better for: goals scored per match.
1.11 goals / match - BKMA · 0.62 goals / match - Shirak
BKMA is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.56 goals / match - BKMA · 1.81 goals / match - Shirak
BKMA scores in 67% of matches (18 of 27 matches), while Shirak keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 26 matches).
Shirak scores in 38% of matches (10 of 26 matches), while BKMA keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — BKMA
Over / Under — Shirak
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
BKMA is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.07 pts / match - BKMA · 0.92 pts / match - Shirak
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
BKMA - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 15%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Shirak - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 8%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
BKMA
Shirak
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Armenian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| BKMA | Liga | Shirak | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.67 | 2.56 | ▼ 2.42 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 44% | ▼ 35% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 52% | 46% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 33% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 74% | 69% | ▼ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | • 78% | 78% | • 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): BKMA 1 - 1 - 0 Shirak. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of BKMA vs Shirak?
The Armenian Premier League match finished BKMA 0:0 Shirak. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between BKMA and Shirak?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches BKMA won 1, Shirak won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before BKMA vs Shirak?
BKMA score 1.11 goals per game on average and Shirak 0.62. The Armenian Premier League average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 63% of BKMA's matches and 35% of Shirak's.
What form are BKMA and Shirak in?
Over the last 5 games BKMA have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Shirak 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for BKMA vs Shirak?
The statistical background for BKMA vs Shirak — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.