Blacks Power vs Vipers: match statistics
Blacks Power vs Vipers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Blacks Power played Vipers in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 8 October 2026. Final score: 0:4.
Current form
Blacks Power: 3-0-1, 2.25 points/match. Vipers: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match.
Goal statistics
Blacks Power scores 1.25 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. Vipers scores 1.50 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.00 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Blacks Power 50%, Vipers 0%. Over 2.5: Blacks Power 50%, Vipers 50%. League level: BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 36%.
xG, shots and style
Vipers has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.54. Blacks Power: 10.0 shots per match, Vipers: 11.5.
Match halves
Blacks Power: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.75. Vipers: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Blacks Power: 46-60 (2 goals). Vipers: 61-75 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Uganda Premier League: 2.00 goals per match, BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 36%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Blacks Power sit 4th and have won 3 of their 4 league matches so far, while Vipers are 11th. The hosts have won both of their home games without conceding, averaging 13.5 shots there, including 7 on target. Their average home xG is 1.82, but opponents’ xG of 1.65 suggests that their clean sheets so far do not mean their goal has been free from danger. Vipers have won just 1 of their last 5 matches, but scored 5 goals and conceded 4 during that run, so they could put up a fight. Home advantage and Blacks Power’s stronger results point to a home win, although the limited data on Vipers’ away performances adds uncertainty to the prediction.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS - No is more likely, meaning at least one team fails to score: in the league, both teams score in 38% of matches, with an average of 2.03 goals per game. In their recent matches, both teams scored in 50% of Blacks Power’s games and 40% of Vipers’ games, while they conceded an average of 0.75 and 0.8 goals per match, respectively. Their attacking potential nevertheless calls for caution: their average xG in this run is 1.54 and 1.51, respectively, so a scenario in which both teams score remains plausible. Vipers’ zero average in away-game statistics is not sufficient evidence that the visitors will fail to score, so the preference for BTTS - No is only moderate.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
In their most recent available matches, Blacks Power averaged 1.25 goals scored and 0.75 conceded, while Vipers averaged 1.0 scored and 0.8 conceded, pointing to a moderate goal tally. Although both teams’ average xG figures are higher, at 1.54 and 1.51 respectively, their actual finishing has fallen short of the quality of chances created. The league averages 2.03 goals per match, and only 38% of matches go Over 2.5 goals. Moreover, none of the Blacks Power home matches included in the analysis went Over 3.5 goals, so with a forecast of 2.25 goals, the strongest pick is Under 3.5. Vipers’ zero averages in away matches do not provide a reliable basis for a forecast, so greater weight is given to their overall results.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Blacks Power win: in their most recent available matches, the hosts were level at the break in 67% of cases, compared with 60% for Vipers. After the break, Blacks Power averaged 1.0 goals against Vipers’ 0.4, pointing to the match being decided in the second half. The hosts have recently averaged 2.25 points per match, compared with 1.0 for the visitors, and won 75% and 20% of their matches, respectively. However, the X/1 pick is not certain, as Blacks Power were not level at half-time in either of their two available home matches, while Vipers’ zero away statistics are not reliable evidence of their weakness.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Blacks Power | Vipers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 53% | 22% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.60 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Blacks Power is 50% better for: last-5 form.
2.25 pts / match - Blacks Power · 1.5 pts / match - Vipers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vipers is 20% better for: goals scored per match.
1.25 goals / match - Blacks Power · 1.5 goals / match - Vipers
Vipers is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.75 goals / match - Blacks Power · 0.5 goals / match - Vipers
Blacks Power scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Vipers keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).
Vipers scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Blacks Power keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Blacks Power
Over / Under - Vipers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Vipers is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.75 pts / match - Blacks Power · 1.5 pts / match - Vipers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Blacks Power - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Vipers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.75 | 1.75 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 75% |
| No goal | 75% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.50 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 100% |
| No goal | 50% | 50% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Blacks Power
Vipers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Blacks Power | Liga | Vipers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.00 | 2.00 | • 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 36% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 36% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 39% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 56% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 75% | 64% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Blacks Power vs Vipers?
The Uganda Premier League match finished Blacks Power 0:4 Vipers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Blacks Power vs Vipers?
Blacks Power score 1.25 goals per game on average and Vipers 1.50. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Blacks Power's matches and 0% of Vipers's.
What form are Blacks Power and Vipers in?
Over the last 5 games Blacks Power have a 3-0-1 record (2.25 points per game) and Vipers 1-0-1 (1.50 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Blacks Power vs Vipers?
The statistical background for Blacks Power vs Vipers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


