Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 15 October 2026

Blacks Power vs Vipers: match statistics

Blacks Power crest
Blacks Power
0 : 4half-time 0:3
Vipers crest
Vipers

Blacks Power vs Vipers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Blacks Power played Vipers in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 8 October 2026. Final score: 0:4.

Current form

Blacks Power: 3-0-1, 2.25 points/match. Vipers: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

Blacks Power scores 1.25 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. Vipers scores 1.50 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.00 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Blacks Power 50%, Vipers 0%. Over 2.5: Blacks Power 50%, Vipers 50%. League level: BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 36%.

xG, shots and style

Vipers has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.54. Blacks Power: 10.0 shots per match, Vipers: 11.5.

Match halves

Blacks Power: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.75. Vipers: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Blacks Power: 46-60 (2 goals). Vipers: 61-75 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.00 goals per match, BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 36%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Blacks Power sit 4th and have won 3 of their 4 league matches so far, while Vipers are 11th. The hosts have won both of their home games without conceding, averaging 13.5 shots there, including 7 on target. Their average home xG is 1.82, but opponents’ xG of 1.65 suggests that their clean sheets so far do not mean their goal has been free from danger. Vipers have won just 1 of their last 5 matches, but scored 5 goals and conceded 4 during that run, so they could put up a fight. Home advantage and Blacks Power’s stronger results point to a home win, although the limited data on Vipers’ away performances adds uncertainty to the prediction.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - No is more likely, meaning at least one team fails to score: in the league, both teams score in 38% of matches, with an average of 2.03 goals per game. In their recent matches, both teams scored in 50% of Blacks Power’s games and 40% of Vipers’ games, while they conceded an average of 0.75 and 0.8 goals per match, respectively. Their attacking potential nevertheless calls for caution: their average xG in this run is 1.54 and 1.51, respectively, so a scenario in which both teams score remains plausible. Vipers’ zero average in away-game statistics is not sufficient evidence that the visitors will fail to score, so the preference for BTTS - No is only moderate.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their most recent available matches, Blacks Power averaged 1.25 goals scored and 0.75 conceded, while Vipers averaged 1.0 scored and 0.8 conceded, pointing to a moderate goal tally. Although both teams’ average xG figures are higher, at 1.54 and 1.51 respectively, their actual finishing has fallen short of the quality of chances created. The league averages 2.03 goals per match, and only 38% of matches go Over 2.5 goals. Moreover, none of the Blacks Power home matches included in the analysis went Over 3.5 goals, so with a forecast of 2.25 goals, the strongest pick is Under 3.5. Vipers’ zero averages in away matches do not provide a reliable basis for a forecast, so greater weight is given to their overall results.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Blacks Power win: in their most recent available matches, the hosts were level at the break in 67% of cases, compared with 60% for Vipers. After the break, Blacks Power averaged 1.0 goals against Vipers’ 0.4, pointing to the match being decided in the second half. The hosts have recently averaged 2.25 points per match, compared with 1.0 for the visitors, and won 75% and 20% of their matches, respectively. However, the X/1 pick is not certain, as Blacks Power were not level at half-time in either of their two available home matches, while Vipers’ zero away statistics are not reliable evidence of their weakness.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 3
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Blacks PowerVipers
12Shots6
Blacks PowerVipers
7Shots on target6
Blacks PowerVipers
1.75xG1.28
Blacks PowerVipers
0Corners1
Blacks PowerVipers
68Dangerous attacks63
Blacks PowerVipers
5Fouls13
Blacks PowerVipers
0Cards0
Blacks PowerVipers

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.25Goals scored / match1.5
Blacks PowerVipers
0.75Goals conceded / match0.5
Blacks PowerVipers
48%Average possession66%
Blacks PowerVipers
5.25Shots on target / match2.5
Blacks PowerVipers

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10Shots per match11.5
Blacks PowerVipers
5.25Shots on target2.5
Blacks PowerVipers
12.5%Shot conversion13%
Blacks PowerVipers
48%Possession66%
Blacks PowerVipers
1.54xG for1.6
Blacks PowerVipers
1.43xG against1.2
Blacks PowerVipers

Shooting quality

Blacks Power: BalancedVipers: Efficient finishing
Blacks PowerVipers
Accuracy (shots on target)53%22%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.60

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Blacks Power is 50% better for: last-5 form.

2.25 pts / match - Blacks Power · 1.5 pts / match - Vipers

Blacks Power
WWWL
Season result split
75% W0% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-1
2.25 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-1
2.25 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.3Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%
Vipers
LW
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 50%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Vipers is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

1.25 goals / match - Blacks Power · 1.5 goals / match - Vipers

Vipers is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.75 goals / match - Blacks Power · 0.5 goals / match - Vipers

Blacks Power scoring profile: very strong

Blacks Power scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Vipers keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

Vipers scoring profile: mixed

Vipers scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Blacks Power keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).

5Goals scored (season)3
Blacks PowerVipers
3Goals conceded (season)1
Blacks PowerVipers
2Average goals in match2
Blacks PowerVipers
5Goals scored (last 5)3
Blacks PowerVipers
3Goals conceded (last 5)1
Blacks PowerVipers

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal50%
Blacks PowerVipers
25%2 goals50%
Blacks PowerVipers
0%3 goals50%
Blacks PowerVipers
0%4 goals0%
Blacks PowerVipers

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal50%
Blacks PowerVipers
25%2 goals0%
Blacks PowerVipers
0%3 goals0%
Blacks PowerVipers
0%4 goals0%
Blacks PowerVipers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time0%
Blacks PowerVipers
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Blacks PowerVipers
0%Scored in both halves50%
Blacks PowerVipers

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Blacks PowerVipers
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS50%
Blacks PowerVipers
50%BTTS - last 50%
Blacks PowerVipers

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Blacks PowerVipers
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Blacks PowerVipers
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Blacks PowerVipers

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
Blacks PowerVipers
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Blacks PowerVipers
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Blacks PowerVipers

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Vipers is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.75 pts / match - Blacks Power · 1.5 pts / match - Vipers

Blacks Power - half-time state
0% leading75% draw25% trailing
Vipers - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.75Points per match (1st half)1.5
Blacks PowerVipers
0.25Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Blacks PowerVipers
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Blacks PowerVipers
0.75Average goals (1st half)1
Blacks PowerVipers
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Blacks PowerVipers
75%No goal before half-time50%
Blacks PowerVipers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.75Points per match (2nd half)2
Blacks PowerVipers
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)1
Blacks PowerVipers
0.25Goals conceded (2nd half)0
Blacks PowerVipers
1Average goals (2nd half)1
Blacks PowerVipers
75%Clean sheet after half-time100%
Blacks PowerVipers
50%No goal after half-time50%
Blacks PowerVipers

Blacks Power - second-half results

50% W25% D25% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Vipers - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Blacks Power - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.751.75
Goals scored / match0.30.8
Goals conceded / match0.50.3
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal50%75%
2 goals25%25%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%75%
No goal75%50%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 75% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 25% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 1
Vipers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.502.00
Goals scored / match0.51.0
Goals conceded / match0.50.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal100%50%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%100%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Blacks Power
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Vipers
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Blacks Power

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.68
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Vipers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.70
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
200%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
40%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

Blacks PowerLigaVipers
Average goals in match• 2.002.00• 2.00
Both teams scored▲ 50%36%▼ 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%36%▲ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 50%39%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%56%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 75%64%▼ 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.00
Average goals per match
36%
Both teams scored
36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / match
0.75
Away goals / match
+67%
Home attack advantage
+40%
Home defence advantage
+28%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Blacks Power vs Vipers?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Blacks Power 0:4 Vipers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Blacks Power vs Vipers?

Blacks Power score 1.25 goals per game on average and Vipers 1.50. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Blacks Power's matches and 0% of Vipers's.

What form are Blacks Power and Vipers in?

Over the last 5 games Blacks Power have a 3-0-1 record (2.25 points per game) and Vipers 1-0-1 (1.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Blacks Power vs Vipers?

The statistical background for Blacks Power vs Vipers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.