Japan - J2 LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Blaublitz Akita vs Omiya Ardija: match statistics

Blaublitz Akita crest
Blaublitz Akita
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Omiya Ardija crest
Omiya Ardija

Blaublitz Akita vs Omiya Ardija: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Blaublitz Akita played Omiya Ardija in J2 League (Japan). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Blaublitz Akita: 1-1-2, 1.00 points/match. Omiya Ardija: 3-1-0, 2.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

Blaublitz Akita scores 1.00 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Omiya Ardija scores 2.50 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.74 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Blaublitz Akita 25%, Omiya Ardija 75%. Over 2.5: Blaublitz Akita 50%, Omiya Ardija 75%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Omiya Ardija has higher xG: 1.75 vs 1.39. Blaublitz Akita: 10.5 shots per match, Omiya Ardija: 15.0.

Match halves

Blaublitz Akita: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50. Omiya Ardija: half-time lead 75%, second-half goals 1.25.

Goals by minute

Blaublitz Akita: 31-45+ (2 goals). Omiya Ardija: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

J2 League: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Omiya Ardija sit top of the table and remain unbeaten after 4 rounds, winning 3 matches, while Blaublitz Akita have just 1 victory and 2 defeats. The visitors are in excellent form: they have recorded 4 wins and a draw in their last five matches, scoring 12 goals, whereas the hosts have conceded as many as 10 goals and lost 3 times over the same period. Away from home, Omiya average 3.5 goals per match, registering 13 shots and 5 shots on target with a 27% conversion rate, clearly outperforming Akita’s home figures of 1.5 goals, 8.5 shots and 3.5 shots on target. The hosts’ defence allows opponents an xG of 2.26 and concedes an average of 2 goals at home, which aligns well with the league leaders’ attacking potential, reflected by an xG of 1.51 away from home. Akita have failed to score in 50% of their home matches, so Omiya’s advantage in quality, form and consistency points towards an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Omiya Ardija has an exceptionally strong goalscoring signal: they average 3.5 goals, including 2.4 across their last five matches, with BTTS at 100% this season. Blaublitz Akita conceded an average of 2.0 goals in their last five games, while their xG conceded stood at 2.04, clearly supporting the expectation of at least one away goal. The hosts do, however, create solid chances, averaging 1.98 xG this season and 6.0 shots on target per match, while Omiya have kept no clean sheets. Akita has only recorded 40% BTTS across their last five matches and 50% clean sheets over the entire season, so the Goal/Goal scenario is not overwhelmingly favored. Omiya’s superior form, a run of four wins and a draw, combined with their attacking strength and the defensive vulnerability of both sides, support BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Omiya Ardija are in excellent attacking form: they have averaged 2.4 goals over their last 5 matches, while Blaublitz Akita have conceded 2.0 goals per game over the same period. The hosts have lower scoring potential, but they average 1.98 xG at home, while Omiya allow opponents 1.66 xG. Omiya’s matches have gone over 1.5 goals in 100% of their appearances so far, with both teams scoring at least once in every game. In addition, both teams have recorded at least 3 goals in 60% of their last 5 matches, with averages of 3.0 goals for Akita and 3.4 for Omiya. Therefore, the safest edge is Over 1.5 goals, as the visitors’ attacking data and the hosts’ recent defensive weakness clearly reduce the likelihood of a one-goal-or-fewer scenario.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Omiya Ardija are in significantly better recent form: across their last five matches, they have averaged 2.4 goals scored, conceded 1.0, and won 80% of their games, while Blaublitz Akita have scored 1.0 goal, conceded 2.0, and lost 60% of their matches. The visitors have started matches very strongly, leading at the break in 80% of their last five appearances and averaging 1.2 goals before half-time; the hosts were trailing at this stage in 60% of their matches, scoring just 0.4 goals on average. Season-long data also favors Omiya, who have won all of their matches so far, averaging 3.5 goals and 3.0 points per game, compared with Akita’s 1.5 goals and 2.0 points. The visitors’ advantage should persist after the break, as they have averaged 1.2 goals scored in second halves over their last five matches, while Akita have conceded an average of 1.0 goal after half-time. Although the hosts create more chances, with an average xG of 1.98 compared with their opponents’ 1.51, Omiya are far more clinical: they convert 27% of their shots into goals, while Akita convert only 9%, supporting an HT/FT scenario in which the visitors lead at half-time and go on to win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

30Possession (%)70
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
9Shots20
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
3Shots on target5
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
1.04xG2.11
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
7Corners6
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
37Dangerous attacks71
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
9Fouls11
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
3Cards2
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
1Goals scored / match2.5
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
1.5Goals conceded / match1.25
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
38%Average possession50%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
3.75Shots on target / match5.5
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.5Shots per match15
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
3.75Shots on target5.5
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
9.5%Shot conversion16.7%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
38%Possession50%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
1.39xG for1.75
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
1.87xG against1.36
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija

Shooting quality

Blaublitz Akita: BalancedOmiya Ardija: Attacking
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
Accuracy (shots on target)36%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.45

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Omiya Ardija is 150% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Blaublitz Akita · 2.5 pts / match - Omiya Ardija

Blaublitz Akita
DLWL
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.87BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 50%
Omiya Ardija
WWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
75% W25% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-0
2.50 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-0
2.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.5Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.75Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 75%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Omiya Ardija is 150% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Blaublitz Akita · 2.5 goals / match - Omiya Ardija

Omiya Ardija is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Blaublitz Akita · 1.25 goals / match - Omiya Ardija

Blaublitz Akita scoring profile: strong

Blaublitz Akita scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while Omiya Ardija keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

Omiya Ardija scoring profile: very strong

Omiya Ardija scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Blaublitz Akita keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

4Goals scored (season)10
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
6Goals conceded (season)5
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
2.5Average goals in match3.75
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
4Goals scored (last 5)10
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
25%2 goals75%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
25%3 goals50%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
0%4 goals25%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
25%2 goals50%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
25%3 goals0%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
25%4 goals0%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

46%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time25%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
0%BTTS in both halves25%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
25%Scored in both halves50%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS75%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
25%BTTS - last 575%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time75%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Omiya Ardija is 125% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Blaublitz Akita · 2.25 pts / match - Omiya Ardija

Blaublitz Akita - half-time state
25% leading25% draw50% trailing
Omiya Ardija - half-time state
75% leading0% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)2.25
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
0.5Goals scored (1st half)1.25
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
1.25Average goals (1st half)2
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
75%No goal before half-time25%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)2
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)1.25
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
1.25Average goals (2nd half)1.75
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija
50%No goal after half-time25%
Blaublitz AkitaOmiya Ardija

Blaublitz Akita - second-half results

50% W0% R50% P
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Omiya Ardija - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
9
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 75% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Blaublitz Akita - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.50
Goals scored / match0.50.5
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.31.3
1 goal75%100%
2 goals50%25%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal75%50%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 25% leading - 25% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Omiya Ardija - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.252.00
Goals scored / match1.31.3
Goals conceded / match0.80.5
Average goals in match2.01.8
1 goal100%75%
2 goals75%75%
3 goals25%25%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal25%25%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 75% leading - 0% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Blaublitz Akita
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
2
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Omiya Ardija
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Blaublitz Akita

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Omiya Ardija

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.86
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.75
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
214%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).

Teams vs league

Blaublitz AkitaLigaOmiya Ardija
Average goals in match 2.502.74 3.75
Both teams scored 25%46% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%52% 75%
Clean sheets 25%32% 25%
Goal before half-time 75%72% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%83% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.74
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.57
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Blaublitz AkitaYellow cardHiroto Morooka
  2. Blaublitz AkitaYellow cardKoki Doi
  3. Omiya ArdijaYellow cardRyuya Nishio
  4. Omiya ArdijaSubstitutionOn: Kota NakayamaOff: Masato Kojima
  5. Blaublitz AkitaYellow cardKoki Doi
  6. Blaublitz AkitaSubstitutionOn: Takuma MizutaniOff: Shota Suzuki
  7. Blaublitz AkitaSubstitutionOn: Ryota NakamuraOff: Masakazu Yoshioka
  8. Omiya ArdijaYellow cardKaishin Sekiguchi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Blaublitz Akita 0 - 0 - 2 Omiya Ardija. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Omiya Ardija
5 : 0
AFC Blaublitz Akita
AFC Blaublitz Akita
1 : 2
Omiya Ardija

FAQ

What was the result of Blaublitz Akita vs Omiya Ardija?

The J2 League match finished Blaublitz Akita 0:0 Omiya Ardija. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Blaublitz Akita and Omiya Ardija?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Blaublitz Akita won 0, Omiya Ardija won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Blaublitz Akita vs Omiya Ardija?

Blaublitz Akita score 1.00 goals per game on average and Omiya Ardija 2.50. The J2 League average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Blaublitz Akita's matches and 75% of Omiya Ardija's.

What form are Blaublitz Akita and Omiya Ardija in?

Over the last 5 games Blaublitz Akita have a 1-1-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Omiya Ardija 3-1-0 (2.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Blaublitz Akita vs Omiya Ardija?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Blaublitz Akita vs Omiya Ardija: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.