Blaublitz Akita vs Omiya Ardija: match statistics
Blaublitz Akita vs Omiya Ardija: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Blaublitz Akita played Omiya Ardija in J2 League (Japan). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Blaublitz Akita: 1-1-2, 1.00 points/match. Omiya Ardija: 3-1-0, 2.50 points/match.
Goal statistics
Blaublitz Akita scores 1.00 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Omiya Ardija scores 2.50 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.74 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Blaublitz Akita 25%, Omiya Ardija 75%. Over 2.5: Blaublitz Akita 50%, Omiya Ardija 75%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Omiya Ardija has higher xG: 1.75 vs 1.39. Blaublitz Akita: 10.5 shots per match, Omiya Ardija: 15.0.
Match halves
Blaublitz Akita: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50. Omiya Ardija: half-time lead 75%, second-half goals 1.25.
Goals by minute
Blaublitz Akita: 31-45+ (2 goals). Omiya Ardija: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
J2 League: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Omiya Ardija sit top of the table and remain unbeaten after 4 rounds, winning 3 matches, while Blaublitz Akita have just 1 victory and 2 defeats. The visitors are in excellent form: they have recorded 4 wins and a draw in their last five matches, scoring 12 goals, whereas the hosts have conceded as many as 10 goals and lost 3 times over the same period. Away from home, Omiya average 3.5 goals per match, registering 13 shots and 5 shots on target with a 27% conversion rate, clearly outperforming Akita’s home figures of 1.5 goals, 8.5 shots and 3.5 shots on target. The hosts’ defence allows opponents an xG of 2.26 and concedes an average of 2 goals at home, which aligns well with the league leaders’ attacking potential, reflected by an xG of 1.51 away from home. Akita have failed to score in 50% of their home matches, so Omiya’s advantage in quality, form and consistency points towards an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Omiya Ardija has an exceptionally strong goalscoring signal: they average 3.5 goals, including 2.4 across their last five matches, with BTTS at 100% this season. Blaublitz Akita conceded an average of 2.0 goals in their last five games, while their xG conceded stood at 2.04, clearly supporting the expectation of at least one away goal. The hosts do, however, create solid chances, averaging 1.98 xG this season and 6.0 shots on target per match, while Omiya have kept no clean sheets. Akita has only recorded 40% BTTS across their last five matches and 50% clean sheets over the entire season, so the Goal/Goal scenario is not overwhelmingly favored. Omiya’s superior form, a run of four wins and a draw, combined with their attacking strength and the defensive vulnerability of both sides, support BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Omiya Ardija are in excellent attacking form: they have averaged 2.4 goals over their last 5 matches, while Blaublitz Akita have conceded 2.0 goals per game over the same period. The hosts have lower scoring potential, but they average 1.98 xG at home, while Omiya allow opponents 1.66 xG. Omiya’s matches have gone over 1.5 goals in 100% of their appearances so far, with both teams scoring at least once in every game. In addition, both teams have recorded at least 3 goals in 60% of their last 5 matches, with averages of 3.0 goals for Akita and 3.4 for Omiya. Therefore, the safest edge is Over 1.5 goals, as the visitors’ attacking data and the hosts’ recent defensive weakness clearly reduce the likelihood of a one-goal-or-fewer scenario.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Omiya Ardija are in significantly better recent form: across their last five matches, they have averaged 2.4 goals scored, conceded 1.0, and won 80% of their games, while Blaublitz Akita have scored 1.0 goal, conceded 2.0, and lost 60% of their matches. The visitors have started matches very strongly, leading at the break in 80% of their last five appearances and averaging 1.2 goals before half-time; the hosts were trailing at this stage in 60% of their matches, scoring just 0.4 goals on average. Season-long data also favors Omiya, who have won all of their matches so far, averaging 3.5 goals and 3.0 points per game, compared with Akita’s 1.5 goals and 2.0 points. The visitors’ advantage should persist after the break, as they have averaged 1.2 goals scored in second halves over their last five matches, while Akita have conceded an average of 1.0 goal after half-time. Although the hosts create more chances, with an average xG of 1.98 compared with their opponents’ 1.51, Omiya are far more clinical: they convert 27% of their shots into goals, while Akita convert only 9%, supporting an HT/FT scenario in which the visitors lead at half-time and go on to win.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Blaublitz Akita | Omiya Ardija | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Omiya Ardija is 150% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Blaublitz Akita · 2.5 pts / match - Omiya Ardija
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Omiya Ardija is 150% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Blaublitz Akita · 2.5 goals / match - Omiya Ardija
Omiya Ardija is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - Blaublitz Akita · 1.25 goals / match - Omiya Ardija
Blaublitz Akita scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while Omiya Ardija keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).
Omiya Ardija scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Blaublitz Akita keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Blaublitz Akita
Over / Under - Omiya Ardija
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Omiya Ardija is 125% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Blaublitz Akita · 2.25 pts / match - Omiya Ardija
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Blaublitz Akita - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Omiya Ardija - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 75% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.50 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 75% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.25 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.5 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 75% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 25% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 25% | 25% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Blaublitz Akita
Omiya Ardija
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).
Teams vs league
| Blaublitz Akita | Liga | Omiya Ardija | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.50 | 2.74 | ▲ 3.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 25% | 46% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 52% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 32% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 72% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 83% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Blaublitz Akita 0 - 0 - 2 Omiya Ardija. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Blaublitz Akita vs Omiya Ardija?
The J2 League match finished Blaublitz Akita 0:0 Omiya Ardija. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Blaublitz Akita and Omiya Ardija?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Blaublitz Akita won 0, Omiya Ardija won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Blaublitz Akita vs Omiya Ardija?
Blaublitz Akita score 1.00 goals per game on average and Omiya Ardija 2.50. The J2 League average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Blaublitz Akita's matches and 75% of Omiya Ardija's.
What form are Blaublitz Akita and Omiya Ardija in?
Over the last 5 games Blaublitz Akita have a 1-1-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Omiya Ardija 3-1-0 (2.50 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Blaublitz Akita vs Omiya Ardija?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Blaublitz Akita vs Omiya Ardija: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


