Blaublitz Akita vs Tokushima Vortis: match statistics
Blaublitz Akita vs Tokushima Vortis: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Blaublitz Akita played Tokushima Vortis in J2 League (Japan). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Final score: 4:1.
Current form
Blaublitz Akita: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Tokushima Vortis: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Blaublitz Akita scores 0.80 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. Tokushima Vortis scores 0.60 and concedes 0.80. League average: 2.68 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Blaublitz Akita 20%, Tokushima Vortis 20%. Over 2.5: Blaublitz Akita 40%, Tokushima Vortis 20%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Blaublitz Akita has higher xG: 1.28 vs 0.94. Blaublitz Akita: 9.8 shots per match, Tokushima Vortis: 7.6.
Match halves
Blaublitz Akita: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40. Tokushima Vortis: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.20.
Goals by minute
Blaublitz Akita: 31-45+ (2 goals). Tokushima Vortis: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
J2 League: 2.68 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Blaublitz Akita have the home advantage: they average 1.00 goal per home game and keep a clean sheet in 67% of their matches, while Tokushima Vortis score just 0.50 goals per away game. However, the hosts are struggling creatively, with an average xG of 1.10, and have failed to score in 67% of their home fixtures. Tokushima are showing significantly better overall current form, winning 3 of their last 5 matches and conceding only 2 goals in that run, compared with Akita’s record of 1 win, 1 draw and 3 defeats, alongside 6 goals conceded. At the same time, the visitors have lost both of their away matches so far, averaging 2.00 goals conceded and failing to keep a clean sheet, which limits their chances of taking all three points. The combination of both teams’ poor finishing and moderate xG figures—1.10 for Akita and 0.80 for Tokushima in their respective home and away fixtures—points to a closely contested match with a strong possibility of a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for BTTS - No comes from the current form: in their last 5 matches, both Blaublitz Akita and Tokushima Vortis recorded BTTS - Yes in only 20% of games. Akita score just 0.67 goals per home match, while Tokushima average 0.50 away goals, with a very low number of shots on target: 1.67 and 1.50 respectively. The hosts kept a clean sheet in 100% of their home matches, while the visitors failed to score in 50% of away games. Tokushima’s recent results also support a scenario in which at most one side scores, as they have conceded only 2 goals in 5 matches, averaging 0.4 per game. Although the latest xG figures for both teams are close, at 1.45 and 1.37, the overall chance-conversion level and the league BTTS rate of 44% suggest that at least one team will fail to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile points to a limited number of goals: Blaublitz Akita averages 0.67 goals at home, while Tokushima Vortis scores just 0.50 away from home. In their last five matches, both teams recorded goals for both sides in only 20% of games, while just 40% of their matches went Over 2.5 goals. Akita has yet to concede at home, whereas Tokushima has allowed opponents to score only 0.4 goals per match across its last five appearances. Although the teams’ latest xG figures stand at 1.45 and 1.37, their actual finishing efficiency remains low, lowering the projected total to 2.06 goals. The strongest signal is for Under 3.5, as all matches played by both teams so far have stayed below this line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Blaublitz Akita remain unbeaten at home, winning 67% of their matches and conceding an average of 0.00 goals, while Tokushima Vortis have lost every away fixture and conceded an average of 2.00 goals. The hosts were leading at the break in 1 of their 3 home matches, while drawing the other 2, without conceding before half-time; Tokushima have never led away from home and went into the interval trailing in 50% of cases. Akita’s first-half advantage is supported by a record of 1 goal scored and 0 conceded, compared with Tokushima conceding an average of 1 goal before the break. After half-time, the hosts have still not conceded, whereas the visitors conceded an average of 1.00 goal and lost the second half of every away match. Despite Tokushima’s better recent form, with 60% wins in their last five matches compared with Akita’s 20%, the hosts’ home profile and the visitors’ away defensive weakness most strongly point to Akita leading at half-time and securing the full-time win, i.e. the HT/FT 1/1 outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Blaublitz Akita | Tokushima Vortis | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 21% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Tokushima Vortis is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Blaublitz Akita · 1.4 pts / match - Tokushima Vortis
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Blaublitz Akita is 33% better for: goals scored per match.
0.8 goals / match - Blaublitz Akita · 0.6 goals / match - Tokushima Vortis
Tokushima Vortis is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.2 goals / match - Blaublitz Akita · 0.8 goals / match - Tokushima Vortis
Blaublitz Akita scores in 40% of matches (2 of 5 matches), while Tokushima Vortis keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 matches).
Tokushima Vortis scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Blaublitz Akita keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Blaublitz Akita
Over / Under - Tokushima Vortis
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tokushima Vortis is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Blaublitz Akita · 1.2 pts / match - Tokushima Vortis
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Blaublitz Akita - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Tokushima Vortis - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Blaublitz Akita
Tokushima Vortis
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).
Teams vs league
| Blaublitz Akita | Liga | Tokushima Vortis | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.00 | 2.68 | ▼ 1.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 20% | 44% | ▼ 20% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 50% | ▼ 20% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 33% | ▲ 60% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 72% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | • 80% | 80% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Blaublitz Akita 0 - 1 - 1 Tokushima Vortis. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Blaublitz Akita vs Tokushima Vortis?
The J2 League match finished Blaublitz Akita 4:1 Tokushima Vortis. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Blaublitz Akita and Tokushima Vortis?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Blaublitz Akita won 0, Tokushima Vortis won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Blaublitz Akita vs Tokushima Vortis?
Blaublitz Akita score 0.80 goals per game on average and Tokushima Vortis 0.60. The J2 League average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 20% of Blaublitz Akita's matches and 20% of Tokushima Vortis's.
What form are Blaublitz Akita and Tokushima Vortis in?
Over the last 5 games Blaublitz Akita have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Tokushima Vortis 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Blaublitz Akita vs Tokushima Vortis?
The statistical background for Blaublitz Akita vs Tokushima Vortis — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


