Blooming vs Aurora: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Blooming vs Aurora: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Blooming play Aurora in LFPB (Bolivia). The match date is 15 August 2026. Venue: Estadio Ramón Aguilera Costas.
Current form
Blooming: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Aurora: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Blooming scores 1.21 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Aurora scores 1.64 and concedes 1.36. League average: 3.02 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Blooming 50%, Aurora 79%. Over 2.5: Blooming 36%, Aurora 43%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 63%.
xG, shots and style
Aurora has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.46. Blooming: 14.1 shots per match, Aurora: 14.6.
Match halves
Blooming: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.36. Aurora: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Blooming: 0-15 (5 goals). Aurora: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
LFPB: 3.02 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 63%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Blooming | Aurora | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Aurora is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Blooming · 1.2 pts / match - Aurora
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Aurora is 36% better for: goals scored per match.
1.21 goals / match - Blooming · 1.64 goals / match - Aurora
Blooming is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.14 goals / match - Blooming · 1.36 goals / match - Aurora
Blooming scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Aurora keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).
Aurora scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Blooming keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Blooming
Over / Under - Aurora
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Blooming is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.86 pts / match - Blooming · 1.29 pts / match - Aurora
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Blooming - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 29%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Aurora - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Blooming
Aurora
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LFPB).
Teams vs league
| Blooming | Liga | Aurora | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.36 | 3.02 | • 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 64% | ▲ 79% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 63% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 22% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 73% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 79% | 87% | • 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Blooming 1 - 0 - 1 Aurora. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
When do Blooming and Aurora play?
Blooming face Aurora on 15 August 2026 in LFPB at Estadio Ramón Aguilera Costas. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Blooming and Aurora?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Blooming won 1, Aurora won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Blooming vs Aurora?
Blooming score 1.21 goals per game on average and Aurora 1.64. The LFPB average is 3.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Blooming's matches and 79% of Aurora's.
What form are Blooming and Aurora in?
Over the last 5 games Blooming have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Aurora 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Blooming vs Aurora?
The statistical background for Blooming vs Aurora — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.