Blooming vs Club Always Ready: match statistics
Blooming vs Club Always Ready: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Blooming played Club Always Ready in LFPB (Bolivia). The match was played on 6 August 2026. Venue: Estadio Ramón Aguilera Costas. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Blooming: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Club Always Ready: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Blooming scores 1.42 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. Club Always Ready scores 2.33 and concedes 0.50. League average: 3.01 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Blooming 58%, Club Always Ready 42%. Over 2.5: Blooming 42%, Club Always Ready 58%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 62%.
xG, shots and style
Club Always Ready has higher xG: 2.16 vs 1.59. Blooming: 15.5 shots per match, Club Always Ready: 19.9.
Match halves
Blooming: half-time lead 58%, second-half goals 0.42. Club Always Ready: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.75.
Goals by minute
Blooming: 0-15 (5 goals). Club Always Ready: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
LFPB: 3.01 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 62%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Club Always Ready lead the table and have won 8 of their 11 matches this season, while Blooming have a record of 4 wins, 5 draws and 3 defeats. The visitors are in excellent form, winning 4 of their last 5 matches and scoring as many as 18 goals during that run, compared with just 4 goals for Blooming over the same period. Away from home, Always Ready average 2.4 goals per match, create chances worth 2.13 xG and register 7.6 shots on target, surpassing Blooming’s home figures of 1.67 goals, 1.74 xG and 6 shots on target. However, the hosts remain unbeaten at home and concede just 0.5 goals per match, meaning their solid defensive structure and 50% draw rate on home soil significantly increase the likelihood of a closely contested match. Nevertheless, the league leaders’ greater attacking consistency, combined with their unbeaten away record, makes a victory for the visitors the preferred selection.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal for a scenario in which both teams do not score comes from Blooming’s profile: BTTS occurred in only 33% of their league matches, while in their last five games the team averaged just 0.8 goals per match. The hosts kept a clean sheet in 50% of their matches, while Club Always Ready failed to score in 20% of games, creating a realistic path both to a one-sided result and to one team failing to find the net. Always Ready are, however, in excellent attacking form, averaging 3.6 goals and an xG of 2.56 across their last five matches, which significantly increases the visitors’ chances of scoring but does not guarantee a response from Blooming. The hosts’ recent attack generated an xG of 1.45 compared with 2.56 for their opponents, while their scoring efficiency has clearly declined from their season average of 2.5 goals. Although the league records BTTS in 68% of matches, the combination of Blooming’s low season BTTS rate and their current average of 0.8 goals slightly favours BTTS - No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
In Blooming matches, at least 2 goals were scored in 67% of cases, while this figure stands at 80% for Always Ready fixtures. Always Ready are in excellent offensive form: they have averaged 3.6 goals over their last 5 matches, with an xG of 2.56. Blooming scored just 0.8 goals per game during this period, but their opponents conceded an average of 1.0 goal, while the hosts have created chances worth 2.32 xG over the season. Both teams produce a very high number of shots on target—7.5 and 7.6 per match, respectively—which supports going Over a low goals line. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as even a more conservative projection of 2.75 goals provides a clear margin of safety.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Club Always Ready are in clearly superior current form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, averaging 3.6 goals per game, while Blooming have scored just 0.8 goals per match over the same period. The visitors were leading at the break in 80% of their last five matches and have not once been behind at half-time, whereas Blooming, despite leading at the break in 60% of cases, have been significantly less effective after the interval. In second halves, Always Ready have recently averaged 2.2 goals, compared with just 0.2 for the hosts, with Blooming failing to score after half-time in 80% of their matches. Blooming’s home advantage and their seasonal xG of 2.32 compared with 2.13 for their opponents reduce confidence in the selection, but the visitors’ superior current attacking form and tempo most strongly support the HT/FT 2/2 scenario: Always Ready to lead at the break and win the match.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Blooming | Club Always Ready | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Club Always Ready is 88% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Blooming · 3 pts / match - Club Always Ready
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Club Always Ready is 64% better for: goals scored per match.
1.42 goals / match - Blooming · 2.33 goals / match - Club Always Ready
Club Always Ready is 134% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.17 goals / match - Blooming · 0.5 goals / match - Club Always Ready
Blooming scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Club Always Ready keeps a clean sheet in 50% (6 of 12 matches).
Club Always Ready scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Blooming keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Blooming
Over / Under - Club Always Ready
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Blooming is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.08 pts / match - Blooming · 1.75 pts / match - Club Always Ready
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Blooming - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 58% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Club Always Ready - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +10 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Blooming
Club Always Ready
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LFPB).
Teams vs league
| Blooming | Liga | Club Always Ready | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.58 | 3.01 | ▼ 2.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 58% | 65% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 62% | ▼ 58% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 21% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 73% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 86% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Blooming 1 - 0 - 1 Club Always Ready. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Blooming vs Club Always Ready?
The LFPB match finished Blooming 0:0 Club Always Ready. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Blooming and Club Always Ready?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Blooming won 1, Club Always Ready won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Blooming vs Club Always Ready?
Blooming score 1.42 goals per game on average and Club Always Ready 2.33. The LFPB average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Blooming's matches and 42% of Club Always Ready's.
What form are Blooming and Club Always Ready in?
Over the last 5 games Blooming have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Club Always Ready 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Blooming vs Club Always Ready?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


