Blooming vs Real Tomayapo: match statistics
Blooming vs Real Tomayapo: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Blooming played Real Tomayapo in LFPB (Bolivia). The match was played on 20 July 2026. Venue: Estadio Ramón Aguilera Costas. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Blooming: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Real Tomayapo: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Blooming scores 1.67 and concedes 1.22 goals per match. Real Tomayapo scores 0.78 and concedes 2.22. League average: 3.09 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Blooming 67%, Real Tomayapo 44%. Over 2.5: Blooming 56%, Real Tomayapo 56%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 64%.
xG, shots and style
Blooming has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.02. Blooming: 15.1 shots per match, Real Tomayapo: 8.7.
Match halves
Blooming: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 0.56. Real Tomayapo: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Blooming: 0-15 (4 goals). Real Tomayapo: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
LFPB: 3.09 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 64%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Blooming has a clear advantage in home metrics: at home they average 2.00 goals scored and only 0.50 conceded per match, with an attacking xG of 1.82 versus opponents’ xG of 1.38. In attack Blooming averages 17 shots and 6.75 on target per home match, with a conversion rate around 12% and 56% possession, indicating high-quality chances. Real Tomayapo away figures are poor: they score only 0.75 and concede 4.00 goals per match, have an attacking xG of 0.85 against opponents’ xG of 2.20, their away loss rate is 100% and they have no clean sheets (0%). Although Tomayapo have scored 6 goals in the last 5 matches versus Blooming’s 3, their average defending and low shots on target (3.0) make them ineffective on the road. Considering the defensive gap (0.50 vs 4.00), superior chance quality (xG 1.82 vs 0.85) and the fact Blooming are unbeaten at home (0% losses), I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Primary signals favor BTTS - Yes: Real Tomayapo concedes an average of 4.0 goals away and has 0% clean sheets on the road, while Blooming at home posts an xG of 1.16 and averages 0.8 goals per game this season, so the hosts have a realistic chance to score. Real, meanwhile, averages 1.2 goals per game in the last 5 matches (6 goals in last 5), and Blooming concedes 1.8 goals on average across those five games (9 conceded), which increases the probability of both teams scoring. League context supports this scenario — the league has 65% BTTS, and season-to-date Blooming has 40% BTTS at home, Real has 50% BTTS away and 60% BTTS in the last 5 matches. The counter-risk is visible: Blooming has kept 40% clean sheets at home and has 15 goals scored this season, and Real has a low xG_for away of 0.85, so a 1-0 type outcome is possible. Considering Real concedes 4.0 away, their 0% away clean sheets and the league trend of 65% BTTS, I assess that "both teams to score" is clearly more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I calculate expected goals: Blooming 1.68 (attacking xG 1.16 versus average xG conceded by Tomayapo 2.2 -> (1.16+2.2)/2=1.68) and Real Tomayapo 1.09 (attacking xG 0.85 versus average xG conceded by Blooming 1.33 -> (0.85+1.33)/2=1.09), total 2.77. Seasonal data confirm a tendency for goals: Tomayapo has conceded 20 goals this season and averages 4.0 conceded goals per match, while Blooming averages 9.6 shots and 3.8 shots on target. Statistics show Tomayapo away matches finished over 1.5 in 100% of cases and over 2.5 in 100% of cases, whereas Blooming at home has 60% of matches over 1.5 and 20% over 2.5, so the combined signal favors the over. A Poisson distribution model for an expected total of 2.77 suggests about a 76% chance for Over 1.5 goals, about 52% for Over 2.5 goals and about 30% for Over 3.5 goals; consequently the strongest pick is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal indicates a draw at half-time: the hosts have kept a clean sheet in 100% of matches to the break and average 0.0 first-half goals. After the break, however, the advantage may lie with Blooming, as the hosts average 9.6 shots per match, 3.8 on target, and have an xG of 1.16, while Real Tomayapo average 7.5 shots, 3.0 on target and an xG of 0.85 and concede an average of 4.0 goals per match. Additionally, Real Tomayapo concede an average of 2.5 goals after the break, and the hosts score an average of 1.6 second-half goals, which increases the likelihood of a turnaround after half-time. Based on 1.6 points per game for the hosts and 0.0 points per game for the visitors and 40% home wins for Blooming versus 0% away wins for Tomayapo, I select the scenario draw at half-time and home win after 90 minutes (X/1) as the most likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Blooming | Real Tomayapo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Blooming is 114% better for: goals scored per match.
1.67 goals / match - Blooming · 0.78 goals / match - Real Tomayapo
Blooming is 82% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.22 goals / match - Blooming · 2.22 goals / match - Real Tomayapo
Blooming scores in 89% of matches (8 of 9 matches), while Real Tomayapo keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).
Real Tomayapo scores in 56% of matches (5 of 9 matches), while Blooming keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Blooming
Over / Under - Real Tomayapo
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Blooming is 137% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.11 pts / match - Blooming · 0.89 pts / match - Real Tomayapo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Blooming - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Real Tomayapo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Blooming
Real Tomayapo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LFPB).
Teams vs league
| Blooming | Liga | Real Tomayapo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.89 | 3.09 | • 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 64% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 56% | 64% | ▼ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 22% | • 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 71% | ▼ 44% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 87% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Blooming 1 - 1 - 0 Real Tomayapo. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Blooming vs Real Tomayapo?
The LFPB match finished Blooming 1:0 Real Tomayapo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Blooming and Real Tomayapo?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Blooming won 1, Real Tomayapo won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Blooming vs Real Tomayapo?
Blooming score 1.67 goals per game on average and Real Tomayapo 0.78. The LFPB average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Blooming's matches and 44% of Real Tomayapo's.
What form are Blooming and Real Tomayapo in?
Over the last 5 games Blooming have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Real Tomayapo 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Blooming vs Real Tomayapo?
The statistical background for Blooming vs Real Tomayapo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.