Blooming vs The Strongest: match statistics
Blooming vs The Strongest: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Blooming played The Strongest in LFPB (Bolivia). The match was played on 26 July 2026. Venue: Estadio Ramón Aguilera Costas. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Blooming: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. The Strongest: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Blooming scores 1.60 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. The Strongest scores 1.50 and concedes 0.80. League average: 3.14 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Blooming 60%, The Strongest 60%. Over 2.5: Blooming 50%, The Strongest 50%. League level: BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 67%.
xG, shots and style
The Strongest has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.60. Blooming: 15.1 shots per match, The Strongest: 16.8.
Match halves
Blooming: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 0.50. The Strongest: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.80.
Goals by minute
Blooming: 0-15 (4 goals). The Strongest: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
LFPB: 3.14 goals per match, BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 67%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 4.50, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Blooming has a clear home advantage: scores on average 1.8 goals per game and concedes only 0.4, records 6.8 shots on target and xG 1.8, indicating high quality of created chances. The Strongest away averages 1.2 goals scored and concedes 0.6 with xG 1.57, and sit 2nd in the table with a record of 6 wins, 4 draws and 0 losses. Both teams have identical possession (56%) and a similar total shot count (16.6 vs 16.4), but Blooming converts better (11% efficiency vs 7%) and registers more shots on target (6.8 vs 4.6). In the last 5 matches The Strongest scored 4 and conceded 2 (averaging 1.8 points per game), while Blooming scored 3 and conceded 6 (averaging 1.4 points per game), which favors the visitors in terms of defensive form. Considering Blooming’s unbeaten home record (0% losses), 60% clean sheets and superior goal-area efficiency, I predict a narrow home win, with moderate risk of a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal xG values suggest expected goals of around 1.55 for Blooming (xG attack 1.74 and xG against 1.37) and 1.45 for The Strongest (xG attack 1.57 and xG against 1.33), which in a simple Poisson model yields an approximate probability of BTTS - Yes of about 60%. Seasonally Blooming have BTTS at 80% while The Strongest have 40% and the league average BTTS is 65%, which generally supports the 'yes' scenario. However, in the last 5 matches Blooming have only 20% BTTS and average 0.6 goals (3 in 5), whereas The Strongest have 40% BTTS and 0.8 goals (4 in 5), lowering short-term expectations for both teams. Additionally The Strongest have kept a clean sheet in 60% of seasonal appearances versus 20% for Blooming and are conceding on average 0.4 goals per match recently, which works against BTTS. Considering strong xG signals and seasonal shots metrics (5.4 vs 4.6 shots on target) alongside intersecting but ambiguous form trends, I recommend 'BTTS - Yes' with a 60% probability versus 40% for 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and defensive metrics I calculated expected goals: (1.74 + 1.37)/2 = 1.56 for Blooming and (1.57 + 1.33)/2 = 1.45 for The Strongest, yielding a total expected goals of 3.01. Seasonal averages confirm offensive potential — Blooming scores 1.8 goals per game, The Strongest 1.2, and the league average is 3.09; Blooming has 80% of matches Over 1.5 and 60% Over 2.5, while The Strongest have 40% and 40% respectively. In the last 5 matches Blooming scored 3 and conceded 6, and The Strongest scored 4 and conceded 2, indicating a dip in Blooming’s scoring form and greater defensive stability from The Strongest. A Poisson model with λ=3.01 yields probabilities of Over 1.5 ≈80%, Over 2.5 ≈58% and Over 3.5 ≈35%; considering Blooming’s higher finishing efficiency (conversion 10% vs 7%) and shot volume (17.2 vs 16.4), the strongest signal is a bet on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I predict a draw at half-time with Blooming winning the match (X/1). Blooming drew at half-time in 4 of their last 5 home games (drawingAtHT_home = 4, 80%), and The Strongest had a half-time draw in 3 of 5 away matches (drawingAtHT_away = 3, 60%), which strongly supports a draw in the first half. In the second half the home side is more active – Blooming average 1.0 goals after the break versus 0.6 for The Strongest (scored_2hg_avg_home = 1.0 vs scored_2hg_avg_away = 0.6) and have a higher AVG_2hg (1.4 vs 0.6), so they are more likely to turn the game around after the interval. Additionally, Blooming have higher xG (1.74 vs 1.57), more shots on target (5.4 vs 4.6) and a higher average goals per match (2.8 vs 1.8), which is why I assigned the highest probability to the X/1 scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Blooming | The Strongest | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
The Strongest is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Blooming · 1.8 pts / match - The Strongest
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Blooming is 7% better for: goals scored per match.
1.6 goals / match - Blooming · 1.5 goals / match - The Strongest
The Strongest is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.1 goals / match - Blooming · 0.8 goals / match - The Strongest
Blooming scores in 90% of matches (9 of 10 matches), while The Strongest keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 matches).
The Strongest scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Blooming keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Blooming
Over / Under - The Strongest
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Blooming is 69% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.2 pts / match - Blooming · 1.3 pts / match - The Strongest
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Blooming - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 40%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
The Strongest - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Blooming
The Strongest
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LFPB).
Teams vs league
| Blooming | Liga | The Strongest | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.70 | 3.14 | ▼ 2.30 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 60% | 67% | ▼ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 67% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 20% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 74% | ▼ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 87% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Blooming 1 - 0 - 1 The Strongest. Average goals 4.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Blooming vs The Strongest?
The LFPB match finished Blooming 1:1 The Strongest. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Blooming and The Strongest?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Blooming won 1, The Strongest won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Blooming vs The Strongest?
Blooming score 1.60 goals per game on average and The Strongest 1.50. The LFPB average is 3.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Blooming's matches and 60% of The Strongest's.
What form are Blooming and The Strongest in?
Over the last 5 games Blooming have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and The Strongest 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Blooming vs The Strongest?
The statistical background for Blooming vs The Strongest — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.