Bnei Sakhnin vs Hapoel Petah Tikva: match statistics
Hapoel Petah Tikva demonstrates a clear advantage in key offensive statistics, scoring an average of 2 goals away from home with 5 shots on target per match, while Bnei Sakhnin manages only 1.2 goals at home with just 3 shots on target. The visitors also dominate in ball possession (54% vs 39%) and boast a significantly better xG ratio (1.51 vs 0.98 for the hosts). Hapoel's positive goal difference away (+2) in contrast to Bnei Sakhnin's negative goal difference at home (-2) confirms their advantage. Both teams' form is inconsistent, but the visitors' higher shooting efficiency and better offensive metrics point towards their victory. Bnei Sakhnin concedes an average of 1.4 goals at home, which further favors the offensively-minded visitors, who rarely leave the pitch without scoring (only 20% of away matches without a goal).
Bnei Sakhnin vs Hapoel Petah Tikva: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Bnei Sakhnin played Hapoel Petah Tikva in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The match was played on 7 February 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Bnei Sakhnin: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Hapoel Petah Tikva: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Bnei Sakhnin scores 1.14 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Hapoel Petah Tikva scores 1.76 and concedes 1.57. League average: 3.11 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Bnei Sakhnin 48%, Hapoel Petah Tikva 62%. Over 2.5: Bnei Sakhnin 48%, Hapoel Petah Tikva 62%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Hapoel Petah Tikva has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.01. Bnei Sakhnin: 8.5 shots per match, Hapoel Petah Tikva: 12.4.
Match halves
Bnei Sakhnin: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.57. Hapoel Petah Tikva: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.76.
Goals by minute
Bnei Sakhnin: 0-15 (6 goals). Hapoel Petah Tikva: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Israeli Premier League: 3.11 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Hapoel Petah Tikva demonstrates a clear advantage in key offensive statistics, scoring an average of 2 goals away from home with 5 shots on target per match, while Bnei Sakhnin manages only 1.2 goals at home with just 3 shots on target. The visitors also dominate in ball possession (54% vs 39%) and boast a significantly better xG ratio (1.51 vs 0.98 for the hosts). Hapoel's positive goal difference away (+2) in contrast to Bnei Sakhnin's negative goal difference at home (-2) confirms their advantage. Both teams' form is inconsistent, but the visitors' higher shooting efficiency and better offensive metrics point towards their victory. Bnei Sakhnin concedes an average of 1.4 goals at home, which further favors the offensively-minded visitors, who rarely leave the pitch without scoring (only 20% of away matches without a goal).
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Bnei Sakhnin | Hapoel Petah Tikva | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Hapoel Petah Tikva is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Bnei Sakhnin · 1.8 pts / match - Hapoel Petah Tikva
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Hapoel Petah Tikva is 54% better for: goals scored per match.
1.14 goals / match - Bnei Sakhnin · 1.76 goals / match - Hapoel Petah Tikva
Bnei Sakhnin is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.29 goals / match - Bnei Sakhnin · 1.57 goals / match - Hapoel Petah Tikva
Bnei Sakhnin scores in 67% of matches (14 of 21 matches), while Hapoel Petah Tikva keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 matches).
Hapoel Petah Tikva scores in 71% of matches (15 of 21 matches), while Bnei Sakhnin keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bnei Sakhnin
Over / Under - Hapoel Petah Tikva
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hapoel Petah Tikva is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.19 pts / match - Bnei Sakhnin · 1.71 pts / match - Hapoel Petah Tikva
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bnei Sakhnin - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Hapoel Petah Tikva - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +6 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Bnei Sakhnin
Hapoel Petah Tikva
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Bnei Sakhnin | Liga | Hapoel Petah Tikva | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.43 | 3.11 | ▲ 3.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 48% | 60% | ▲ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 48% | 59% | ▲ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 24% | • 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 66% | • 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 81% | ▼ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Bnei Sakhnin 0 - 1 - 0 Hapoel Petah Tikva. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Bnei Sakhnin vs Hapoel Petah Tikva?
The Israeli Premier League match finished Bnei Sakhnin 1:2 Hapoel Petah Tikva. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Bnei Sakhnin vs Hapoel Petah Tikva?
Bnei Sakhnin score 1.14 goals per game on average and Hapoel Petah Tikva 1.76. The Israeli Premier League average is 3.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Bnei Sakhnin's matches and 62% of Hapoel Petah Tikva's.
What form are Bnei Sakhnin and Hapoel Petah Tikva in?
Over the last 5 games Bnei Sakhnin have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Hapoel Petah Tikva 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bnei Sakhnin vs Hapoel Petah Tikva?
The statistical background for Bnei Sakhnin vs Hapoel Petah Tikva — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.