Cambodia - Cambodian LeagueData current as of 13 September 2026

Boeung Ket vs Moi Kompong Dewa: match statistics

Boeung Ket crest
Boeung Ket
4 : 3half-time 3:0
Moi Kompong Dewa crest
Moi Kompong Dewa

Boeung Ket vs Moi Kompong Dewa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Boeung Ket played Moi Kompong Dewa in Cambodian League (Cambodia). The match was played on 17 May 2026. Final score: 4:3.

Current form

Boeung Ket: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Moi Kompong Dewa: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Boeung Ket scores 1.38 and concedes 0.90 goals per match. Moi Kompong Dewa scores 1.38 and concedes 1.41. League average: 3.16 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Boeung Ket 34%, Moi Kompong Dewa 52%. Over 2.5: Boeung Ket 38%, Moi Kompong Dewa 48%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Boeung Ket has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.31. Boeung Ket: 11.7 shots per match, Moi Kompong Dewa: 10.3.

Match halves

Boeung Ket: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.83. Moi Kompong Dewa: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.76.

Goals by minute

Boeung Ket: 76-90+ (10 goals). Moi Kompong Dewa: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Cambodian League: 3.16 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Boeung Ket holds a clear defensive edge at home — conceding only 0.43 goals per game and keeping 57% clean sheets, while Moi Kompong Dewa concedes 1.14 goals on the road and records 29% clean sheets. Both teams have 40 goals this season, but the visitors score 1.64 goals away with xG 1.25, whereas the hosts score 1.21 at home with xG 1.39, indicating higher efficiency for the away side (conversion 17% vs 11%). In the last 5 matches Boeung Ket has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (2.0 PPG), while Moi Kompong Dewa has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses (1.4 PPG). The hosts also produce more shots and shots on target at home (11.36 shots and 3.79 SoT per game vs 9.93 and 3.43 for the visitors), which combined with superior defense gives them control of the match. Considering the lower average goals conceded (0.43 vs 1.14), higher PPG in the last 5 (2.0 vs 1.4) and higher clean sheet percentage (57% vs 29%), I predict a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I select BTTS - Yes because recent indicators favor both teams scoring: in the last 5 matches Boeung Ket had BTTS in 60% of games, and Moi Kompong Dewa in 80%. Both teams scored 9 goals in their last 5 matches (avg 1.8 goals per game), with Boeung Ket conceding 1.2 on average and Moi Kompong Dewa 1.6, showing both score and concede. Seasonally Moi Kompong Dewa has BTTS at 57% versus Boeung Ket's 47%, while the league average is 56%, so seasonal rates also slightly lean toward Goal/Goal. Additionally xG and shot metrics suggest an open game: xG for attack is 1.37 for Boeung Ket and 1.25 for Moi, and xG against is 1.57 and 1.73; shots on target are 4.36 vs 3.43, and conversion rate 10% vs 17%, which increases the chance of goals from both sides. Considering 60–80% BTTS form in the last 5, seasonal 47–57% and higher xG against (approx. 1.5–1.73), the assessment is that the "Yes" scenario is clearly more likely than "No".

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Average xG indicate a game inclined to goals: 1.37 xG in Boeung Ket’s attack versus 1.73 xG in Moi Kompong Dewa’s defense yields ~1.55 goals for the home side, and 1.25 xG in the visitors’ attack against 1.57 xG in the home defense gives ~1.41 goals for the away side (total ~2.96). Seasonally 60% of Boeung Ket’s matches and 86% of Moi Kompong Dewa’s matches have finished over 1.5 goals (combined average ~73%), and the league averages 3.14 goals per game, which strengthens the Over 1.5 signal. For the 2.5 line the data are more balanced: season-to-date 47% and 50% Over 2.5, but in the last 5 games the visitors have 80% Over 2.5 vs 40% for the hosts, resulting in a moderate edge for Over 2.5 (~56%). The 3.5 line shows a weaker signal — seasonally only 27–29% of matches exceed 3.5 goals, so Under 3.5 (~72%) is safer; additionally both teams average 11.5 and 9.93 shots with conversion rates of 10% vs 17%, which increases the probability of at least two goals and makes Over 1.5 the best choice.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Half-Time statistics strongly favor the visitors: Moi Kompong Dewa led at the break in 43% of their matches, while Boeung Ket led at the break in only 14%; in the last 5 fixtures the visitors scored 10 goals before half-time (2.0 per match) compared to 6 (1.2) for the hosts. For Full-Time there are also more indicators in favor of the visitors — Moi Kompong Dewa’s season scoring average is 1.64 versus Boeung Ket’s 1.13, the visitors have won 57% of matches against the hosts’ 20%, and the visitors’ shot conversion rate is 17% versus 10% for the hosts; although the hosts’ xG is 1.37 compared to 1.25 for the visitors, the visitors’ efficiency translates into better outcomes. The 31–45' period is particularly significant: the visitors scored 5 goals in that interval while the hosts conceded 6, which explains the frequent lead by the visitors at the break. While Boeung Ket can stage turnarounds in the second half (in the last 5 matches the hosts averaged 1.2 goals in the second half), Moi Kompong Dewa conceded only 0.4 goals after the break over the same 5 matches, so comebacks are possible but difficult. On this basis the most likely HT/FT scenario is the visitors leading at the break and the visitors winning at full-time; therefore I recommend selecting 2/2 as the strongest signal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
1 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
14Shots14
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
5Shots on target5
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
1.57xG1.49
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
11Corners5
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
48Dangerous attacks37
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
2Fouls5
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
0Cards0
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
1.38Goals scored / match1.38
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
0.9Goals conceded / match1.41
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
47%Average possession47%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
4.17Shots on target / match3.72
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.72Shots per match10.31
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
4.17Shots on target3.72
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
11.8%Shot conversion13.4%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
47%Possession47%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
1.47xG for1.31
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
1.49xG against1.65
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa

Shooting quality

Boeung Ket: BalancedMoi Kompong Dewa: Counter-attacking
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
Accuracy (shots on target)36%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Boeung Ket is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Boeung Ket · 1.4 pts / match - Moi Kompong Dewa

Boeung Ket
DWLWW
Season result split
48% W28% D24% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-8-7
1.72 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-6-1
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Moi Kompong Dewa
DLWWL
Season result split
38% W28% D34% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-8-10
1.41 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-3-3
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Boeung Ket is 57% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.9 goals / match - Boeung Ket · 1.41 goals / match - Moi Kompong Dewa

Boeung Ket scoring profile: strong

Boeung Ket scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while Moi Kompong Dewa keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 matches).

Moi Kompong Dewa scoring profile: strong

Moi Kompong Dewa scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Boeung Ket keeps a clean sheet in 41% (12 of 29 matches).

40Goals scored (season)40
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
26Goals conceded (season)41
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
2.28Average goals in match2.79
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
10Goals scored (last 5)9
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal72%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
45%2 goals38%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
17%3 goals17%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
3%4 goals7%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa

How often they concede at least...

59%1 goal69%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
24%2 goals45%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
7%3 goals17%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
0%4 goals3%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
Moi Kompong Dewa - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.15 of 29 matches
55%
League average

Goal patterns

3%BTTS at half-time21%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
0%BTTS in both halves7%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
24%Scored in both halves17%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
60%BTTS - last 580%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Boeung Ket is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.62 pts / match - Boeung Ket · 1.28 pts / match - Moi Kompong Dewa

Boeung Ket - half-time state
38% leading48% draw14% trailing
Moi Kompong Dewa - half-time state
28% leading45% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.62Points per match (1st half)1.28
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
0.55Goals scored (1st half)0.59
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
0.24Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
0.79Average goals (1st half)1.28
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
83%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
62%No goal before half-time62%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.34
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
0.66Goals conceded (2nd half)0.69
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
1.48Average goals (2nd half)1.45
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
48%Clean sheet after half-time52%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa
48%No goal after half-time52%
Boeung KetMoi Kompong Dewa

Boeung Ket - second-half results

34% W34% D31% L
47
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding126%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Moi Kompong Dewa - second-half results

34% W31% D34% L
37
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.28
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Boeung Ket - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Moi Kompong Dewa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match1.20.4
Average goals in match2.01.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Boeung Ket
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
3
2
16-30
9
1
31-45
8
5
46-60
6
5
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Moi Kompong Dewa
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
7
8
16-30
5
7
31-45
8
9
46-60
8
3
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
80%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Boeung Ket

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Moi Kompong Dewa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Cambodian League).

Teams vs league

Boeung KetLigaMoi Kompong Dewa
Average goals in match 2.283.16 2.79
Both teams scored 34%55% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%59% 48%
Clean sheets 41%25% 31%
Goal before half-time 52%71% 62%
Goal after half-time 79%83% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.16
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.62
Away goals / match
+-5%
Home attack advantage
+-5%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Away team

Other recorded players

Arthur Lucas⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Boeung KetGoalMyer BevanAssist: Rosib Sath
  2. Boeung KetGoalCyrus DehmieAssist: Louis Zabala
  3. Moi Kompong DewaGoalArthur Lucas
  4. Boeung KetGoalCyrus Dehmie

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Boeung Ket 1 - 1 - 1 Moi Kompong Dewa. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Boeung Ket vs Moi Kompong Dewa?

The Cambodian League match finished Boeung Ket 4:3 Moi Kompong Dewa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Boeung Ket and Moi Kompong Dewa?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Boeung Ket won 1, Moi Kompong Dewa won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Boeung Ket vs Moi Kompong Dewa?

Boeung Ket score 1.38 goals per game on average and Moi Kompong Dewa 1.38. The Cambodian League average is 3.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 34% of Boeung Ket's matches and 52% of Moi Kompong Dewa's.

What form are Boeung Ket and Moi Kompong Dewa in?

Over the last 5 games Boeung Ket have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Moi Kompong Dewa 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Boeung Ket vs Moi Kompong Dewa?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.