Cambodia - Cambodian LeagueData current as of 06 September 2026

Boeung Ket vs Visakha: match statistics

Boeung Ket crest
Boeung Ket
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Visakha crest
Visakha
130%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
245%(0.00)

Visakha currently displays significantly better form than Boeung Ket, averaging 2.6 points per game over their last five matches compared to the hosts' 1.8. The visitors are on an impressive five-match unbeaten run (4 wins, 1 draw), while Boeung Ket has lost two of their last five. Visakha stands out with their offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 2.33 goals per away match with a shot conversion rate of 20%, significantly surpassing the hosts' 1.44 goals and 13% conversion. Although Boeung Ket has a solid home record (56% win rate), the difference in current form and offensive effectiveness favors the visitors. Both teams have a positive goal difference (+8 for the hosts, +10 for the visitors), suggesting balanced capabilities, but the momentum clearly lies with Visakha.

Boeung Ket vs Visakha: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Boeung Ket played Visakha in Cambodian League (Cambodia). The match was played on 8 February 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Boeung Ket: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Visakha: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Boeung Ket scores 1.44 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Visakha scores 1.89 and concedes 1.42. League average: 3.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Boeung Ket 28%, Visakha 84%. Over 2.5: Boeung Ket 39%, Visakha 58%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Visakha has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.51. Boeung Ket: 12.2 shots per match, Visakha: 12.3.

Match halves

Boeung Ket: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.94. Visakha: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 1.05.

Goals by minute

Boeung Ket: 76-90+ (7 goals). Visakha: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Cambodian League: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Visakha currently displays significantly better form than Boeung Ket, averaging 2.6 points per game over their last five matches compared to the hosts' 1.8. The visitors are on an impressive five-match unbeaten run (4 wins, 1 draw), while Boeung Ket has lost two of their last five. Visakha stands out with their offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 2.33 goals per away match with a shot conversion rate of 20%, significantly surpassing the hosts' 1.44 goals and 13% conversion. Although Boeung Ket has a solid home record (56% win rate), the difference in current form and offensive effectiveness favors the visitors. Both teams have a positive goal difference (+8 for the hosts, +10 for the visitors), suggesting balanced capabilities, but the momentum clearly lies with Visakha.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
Boeung KetVisakha
12Shots23
Boeung KetVisakha
2Shots on target2
Boeung KetVisakha
1.21xG2.08
Boeung KetVisakha
0Corners15
Boeung KetVisakha
44Dangerous attacks69
Boeung KetVisakha
11Fouls13
Boeung KetVisakha
0Cards0
Boeung KetVisakha

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.44Goals scored / match1.89
Boeung KetVisakha
0.83Goals conceded / match1.42
Boeung KetVisakha
49%Average possession47%
Boeung KetVisakha
4.17Shots on target / match4.84
Boeung KetVisakha

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.17Shots per match12.32
Boeung KetVisakha
4.17Shots on target4.84
Boeung KetVisakha
11.9%Shot conversion15.4%
Boeung KetVisakha
49%Possession47%
Boeung KetVisakha
1.51xG for1.64
Boeung KetVisakha
1.3xG against1.59
Boeung KetVisakha

Shooting quality

Boeung Ket: BalancedVisakha: Counter-attacking
Boeung KetVisakha
Accuracy (shots on target)34%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Visakha is 44% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Boeung Ket · 2.6 pts / match - Visakha

Boeung Ket
WWLLW
Season result split
50% W22% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-4-5
1.72 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Visakha
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
37% W42% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-4
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.75Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Visakha is 31% better for: goals scored per match.

1.44 goals / match - Boeung Ket · 1.89 goals / match - Visakha

Boeung Ket is 71% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.83 goals / match - Boeung Ket · 1.42 goals / match - Visakha

Boeung Ket scoring profile: very strong

Boeung Ket scores in 67% of matches (12 of 18 matches), while Visakha keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 19 matches).

Visakha scoring profile: strong

Visakha scores in 84% of matches (16 of 19 matches), while Boeung Ket keeps a clean sheet in 44% (8 of 18 matches).

26Goals scored (season)36
Boeung KetVisakha
15Goals conceded (season)27
Boeung KetVisakha
2.28Average goals in match3.32
Boeung KetVisakha
11Goals scored (last 5)16
Boeung KetVisakha
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
Boeung KetVisakha

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal84%
Boeung KetVisakha
44%2 goals53%
Boeung KetVisakha
17%3 goals26%
Boeung KetVisakha
6%4 goals5%
Boeung KetVisakha

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal95%
Boeung KetVisakha
17%2 goals42%
Boeung KetVisakha
11%3 goals5%
Boeung KetVisakha
0%4 goals0%
Boeung KetVisakha

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time42%
Boeung KetVisakha
0%BTTS in both halves16%
Boeung KetVisakha
33%Scored in both halves37%
Boeung KetVisakha

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
Boeung KetVisakha
22%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Boeung KetVisakha
20%BTTS - last 5100%
Boeung KetVisakha

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Boeung KetVisakha
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
Boeung KetVisakha
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
Boeung KetVisakha

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
Boeung KetVisakha
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
Boeung KetVisakha
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time32%
Boeung KetVisakha

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Boeung Ket is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.61 pts / match - Boeung Ket · 1.37 pts / match - Visakha

Boeung Ket - half-time state
39% leading44% draw17% trailing
Visakha - half-time state
26% leading58% draw16% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.61Points per match (1st half)1.37
Boeung KetVisakha
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.79
Boeung KetVisakha
0.22Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
Boeung KetVisakha
0.72Average goals (1st half)1.37
Boeung KetVisakha
83%Clean sheet before half-time42%
Boeung KetVisakha
61%No goal before half-time47%
Boeung KetVisakha

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1.32
Boeung KetVisakha
0.94Goals scored (2nd half)1.05
Boeung KetVisakha
0.61Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
Boeung KetVisakha
1.56Average goals (2nd half)1.84
Boeung KetVisakha
50%Clean sheet after half-time37%
Boeung KetVisakha
39%No goal after half-time37%
Boeung KetVisakha

Boeung Ket - second-half results

39% W33% R28% P
29
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding128%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Visakha - second-half results

26% W53% R21% P
26
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Boeung Ket - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Visakha - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.80
Goals scored / match1.81.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.2
Average goals in match2.81.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals100%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet0%80%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference+4+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 100% - Half-time goals total: 9

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Boeung Ket
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
2
1
16-30
5
0
31-45
5
3
46-60
5
3
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Visakha
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
6
5
16-30
5
6
31-45
6
5
46-60
7
2
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+43%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Boeung Ket

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
47%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Visakha

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Cambodian League).

Teams vs league

Boeung KetLigaVisakha
Average goals in match 2.283.23 3.32
Both teams scored 28%56% 84%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%61% 58%
Clean sheets 44%25% 5%
Goal before half-time 56%72% 68%
Goal after half-time 83%84% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.23
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.47
Home goals / match
1.77
Away goals / match
+-17%
Home attack advantage
+-20%
Home defence advantage
+-8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
8%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Boeung Ket 0 - 1 - 0 Visakha. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Visakha
2 : 2
Boeung Ket

FAQ

What was the result of Boeung Ket vs Visakha?

The Cambodian League match finished Boeung Ket 0:0 Visakha. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Boeung Ket vs Visakha?

Boeung Ket score 1.44 goals per game on average and Visakha 1.89. The Cambodian League average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 28% of Boeung Ket's matches and 84% of Visakha's.

What form are Boeung Ket and Visakha in?

Over the last 5 games Boeung Ket have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Visakha 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Boeung Ket vs Visakha?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Boeung Ket vs Visakha: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.