Boston United vs Wealdstone: match statistics
Boston United vs Wealdstone: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Boston United played Wealdstone in National League (England). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: The Jakemans Stadium. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Boston United: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Wealdstone: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Boston United scores 1.33 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Wealdstone scores 1.17 and concedes 1.83. League average: 3.07 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Boston United 50%, Wealdstone 67%. Over 2.5: Boston United 50%, Wealdstone 50%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 61%.
xG, shots and style
Boston United has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.39. Boston United: 10.8 shots per match, Wealdstone: 10.3.
Match halves
Boston United: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50. Wealdstone: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Boston United: 31-45+ (3 goals). Wealdstone: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
National League: 3.07 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 61%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Boston United hold a slight edge thanks to their superior recent form: they have collected 7 points from their last five matches, compared with just 4 for Wealdstone. The hosts create significantly more chances at home, averaging 12.33 shots and 5 on target per match, compared with the visitors’ 7.67 shots and 3 attempts on target. The quality of their chances supports this assessment, with Boston averaging 1.60 xG, while Wealdstone produce 1.13 xG away from home and allow opponents 1.77 xG. Wealdstone have conceded 9 goals in their last five matches, while Boston have scored 8 over the same period, which strengthens the case for a strong attacking performance from the hosts. The risk of a draw remains significant, as both teams have failed to score in 33% of their matches in the relevant role; however, Boston’s advantage in chance creation points towards a 1 result.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS pick is supported by Boston United’s very weak defense, as they concede an average of 2.67 goals in home matches and have kept no clean sheets. Wealdstone score an average of 1.33 goals away from home, while their opponents have averaged 1.8 goals against them across their last 5 matches, giving the hosts a realistic route to finding the net. The current form of both teams is also favorable, with BTTS landing in 60% of their last 5 matches, alongside average xG figures of 1.42 for Boston and 1.38 for Wealdstone. The hosts average 13 shots and 4 shots on target per match, while the away xG conceded by Wealdstone is as high as 1.77, making a Boston goal likely despite their season average of only 1.0 goal at home. The main risks to the pick are Wealdstone’s 33% clean-sheet rate and their season BTTS rate of 33%, but the 65% BTTS rate in the league and Boston’s defensive profile tilt the assessment toward a scenario in which both sides score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Boston United create chances worth an average of 1.66 xG at home, while Wealdstone allow opponents 1.77 xG away from home, which strongly supports a goal for the hosts. In their last five matches, Boston scored 1.6 goals per game, whereas Wealdstone conceded as many as 1.8, with the average total number of goals in these respective runs standing at 3.0 and 2.8. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in none of their home matches, while Wealdstone average 1.33 goals away from home, so the visitors also have an offensive case. Over 1.5 goals has landed in 100% of Boston's home matches and 67% of Wealdstone's away matches, making Over 1.5 the strongest choice with a projected total of 2.80 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is for Boston United to lead at the break and hold on for the win, as the hosts were ahead after 45 minutes in 60% of their last five matches, compared with just 20% for Wealdstone. During this period, Boston averaged 1.0 goals scored and 0.4 conceded before half-time, while the visitors averaged 0.6 goals scored and allowed opponents 0.8. The hosts also have a clear edge in chance creation: their average xG stands at 1.66 versus Wealdstone’s 1.13, while shots on target are 4.0 to 3.0. Although Boston have conceded as many as 2.67 goals per match over the course of the season, their current form is more favourable: they are scoring 1.6 goals per game, compared with Wealdstone’s 1.0, while the visitors have lost 60% of their last five matches. After the interval, the risk of surrendering the lead remains significant, but Wealdstone have averaged only 0.4 goals in the second halves of their last five matches, supporting the 1/1 HT/FT selection.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Boston United | Wealdstone | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Boston United is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Boston United · 0.8 pts / match - Wealdstone
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Boston United is 14% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - Boston United · 1.17 goals / match - Wealdstone
Boston United is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.33 goals / match - Boston United · 1.83 goals / match - Wealdstone
Boston United scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Wealdstone keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
Wealdstone scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Boston United keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Boston United
Over / Under - Wealdstone
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Boston United is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / match - Boston United · 1 pts / match - Wealdstone
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Boston United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Wealdstone - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Boston United
Wealdstone
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National League).
Teams vs league
| Boston United | Liga | Wealdstone | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.67 | 3.07 | • 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 65% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 61% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 17% | • 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 72% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 89% | ▼ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Boston United 1 - 1 - 0 Wealdstone. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Boston United vs Wealdstone?
The National League match finished Boston United 1:3 Wealdstone. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Boston United and Wealdstone?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Boston United won 1, Wealdstone won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Boston United vs Wealdstone?
Boston United score 1.33 goals per game on average and Wealdstone 1.17. The National League average is 3.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Boston United's matches and 67% of Wealdstone's.
What form are Boston United and Wealdstone in?
Over the last 5 games Boston United have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Wealdstone 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Boston United vs Wealdstone?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.