Botoşani vs Metaloglobus: match statistics
Botoşani vs Metaloglobus: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Botoşani played Metaloglobus in Liga I (Romania). The match was played on 20 April 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
Botoşani: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Metaloglobus: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Botoşani scores 1.29 and concedes 1.15 goals per match. Metaloglobus scores 0.79 and concedes 2.12. League average: 2.54 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Botoşani 47%, Metaloglobus 56%. Over 2.5: Botoşani 47%, Metaloglobus 62%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Botoşani has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.24. Botoşani: 13.7 shots per match, Metaloglobus: 10.1.
Match halves
Botoşani: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.71. Metaloglobus: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.47.
Goals by minute
Botoşani: 76-90+ (12 goals). Metaloglobus: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga I: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Botoşani is the clear favorite based on statistics: at home they have scored 44 goals this season (1.76 per match) and possess a +14 goal difference, while Metaloglobus have scored only 27 goals all season and average 0.82 goals per away match with a -32 goal difference. The hosts’ defense is markedly superior — Botoşani concede 0.94 goals per home match and keep 29% clean sheets, whereas Metaloglobus concede 2.71 goals on the road and have only 6% clean sheets; the visitors have conceded 72 goals in total this season. Offensively the hosts create more and higher-quality chances: they average 15 shots and 4.94 on target per home match versus Metaloglobus’s 9.41 shots and 3.65 on-target away, and average xG at home is 1.66 compared to 1.19 for the visitors, indicating better chance quality. In the last 5 matches Botoşani have won 2 games and average 1.2 points in that period, Metaloglobus have 1 win and 1.0 point, and the visitors have not recorded any away wins this season (0%), which further favors the hosts. Based on this, I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The 'both teams to score' scenario is more likely due to clear defensive issues on both sides: Metaloglobus concedes an average of 2.71 goals away and has 72 goals conceded this season, with an away clean sheet rate of only 6%. Botoşani at home scores 0.76 and concedes 1.53 per match; their season share of BTTS games is 47%, but BTTS has occurred in 60% of their last 5 matches. Metaloglobus has a season BTTS of 65%, although only 40% in the last 5 matches, which aligns with their high goals conceded (72) and moderate scoring rate of 0.82 goals away. xG against are 1.76 (Botoşani) and 2.07 (Metaloglobus), and Metaloglobus averages 3.65 shots on target, so genuine scoring opportunities exist; the league averages 2.55 goals per game. Considering the low clean sheet rates (12% for Botoşani and 6% for Metaloglobus) and the combination of Metaloglobus’s season BTTS 65% and Botoşani’s 60% BTTS in the last 5, I estimate BTTS probability at 68% vs 32% and recommend a 'BTTS - Yes' bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The prediction is based on xG and defensive data: Botoşani’s attacking xG is 1.30, while Metaloglobus concedes xG of 2.07, yielding expected home goals ≈(1.30+2.07)/2=1.69; similarly for the away side (1.19+1.76)/2=1.47, total ≈3.16 goals. With an expected total of 3.16 goals, a Poisson distribution gives probability for Over 1.5 goals ≈82% (i.e. at least 2 goals), Over 2.5 ≈61% and Over 3.5 ≈39%. Seasonal stats reinforce this picture: Metaloglobus has 82% of matches over 2.5 goals, Botoşani 41%, and both teams show a high share of Over 1.5 (65% home, 88% away). Therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (~82% chance), the 2.5 line is moderately supported (~61%), and Over 3.5 remains risky (~39%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw looks likely: the home side were level at the break in 35% of matches and the visitors in 29%, with average first-half goals of 1.24 (home) versus 1.59 (away). A strong signal in favor of the home side after the break comes from second-half performance – Botoşani averages 1.12 points in second halves compared to 0.59 points for the visitors, while the visitors concede an average of 1.47 goals in the 2nd half and in 88% of their matches more than 0.5 goals are scored after the break. xG and shot metrics show both teams create chances (xG 1.30 vs 1.19 and 10.82 shots for the home side versus 9.41 for the visitors), but the visitors have a higher season-long goals-conceded rate (2.71 vs 1.53 for the home side), which increases the home side’s likelihood of exploiting defensive errors after the break; in the last 5 matches the home side scored 10 first-half goals compared to 5 by the visitors. Therefore my strongest signal is X/1 – a half-time draw (35%/29% HT draws) followed by a home win after the break (1.12 vs 0.59 points and 1.47 conceded by the visitors in the 2nd half).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Botoşani | Metaloglobus | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Botoşani is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Botoşani · 1 pts / match - Metaloglobus
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Botoşani is 63% better for: goals scored per match.
1.29 goals / match - Botoşani · 0.79 goals / match - Metaloglobus
Botoşani is 84% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.15 goals / match - Botoşani · 2.12 goals / match - Metaloglobus
Botoşani scores in 68% of matches (23 of 34 matches), while Metaloglobus keeps a clean sheet in 9% (3 of 34 matches).
Metaloglobus scores in 59% of matches (20 of 34 matches), while Botoşani keeps a clean sheet in 35% (12 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Botoşani
Over / Under - Metaloglobus
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Botoşani is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.18 pts / match - Botoşani · 0.59 pts / match - Metaloglobus
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Botoşani - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Metaloglobus - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 9%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Botoşani
Metaloglobus
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).
Teams vs league
| Botoşani | Liga | Metaloglobus | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.44 | 2.54 | ▲ 2.91 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 51% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 47% | 47% | ▲ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 28% | ▼ 9% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 69% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 65% | 76% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Botoşani 2 - 0 - 0 Metaloglobus. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Botoşani vs Metaloglobus?
The Liga I match finished Botoşani 3:2 Metaloglobus. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Botoşani and Metaloglobus?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Botoşani won 2, Metaloglobus won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Botoşani vs Metaloglobus?
Botoşani score 1.29 goals per game on average and Metaloglobus 0.79. The Liga I average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Botoşani's matches and 56% of Metaloglobus's.
What form are Botoşani and Metaloglobus in?
Over the last 5 games Botoşani have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Metaloglobus 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Botoşani vs Metaloglobus?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Botoşani vs Metaloglobus: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


