Norway - EliteserienBrann StadionData current as of 17 October 2026

Brann vs HamKam: match statistics

Brann crest
Brann
3 : 0half-time 1:0
HamKam crest
HamKam

Brann vs HamKam: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Brann played HamKam in Eliteserien (Norway). The match was played on 16 August 2026. Venue: Brann Stadion. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Brann: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. HamKam: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Brann scores 2.06 and concedes 1.69 goals per match. HamKam scores 1.50 and concedes 1.69. League average: 3.05 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Brann 88%, HamKam 63%. Over 2.5: Brann 88%, HamKam 69%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

Brann has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.33. Brann: 13.0 shots per match, HamKam: 11.1.

Match halves

Brann: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.06. HamKam: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Brann: 31-45+ (9 goals). HamKam: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eliteserien: 3.05 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 4-1-0. Average goals 3.20, BTTS 80%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Brann are in clearly better current form: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 12 goals in the process, while HamKam have recorded just 1 victory, scored 5 goals and lost 3 times. At home, the hosts create more chances, averaging 14.38 shots and 5 on target per match, compared with HamKam’s 11.13 shots and 3.88 on target away from home. Brann’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances, with their average home xG standing at 1.82, while HamKam’s away xG is only 1.32. HamKam have won just 13% of their away matches and fail to score in 25% of them, although Brann’s defence remains vulnerable, conceding an average of 1.63 goals at home. The hosts should control the match more often thanks to an average possession of 65% and greater attacking strength, making a home win the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams record BTTS at 63%, above the league average of 55%, indicating a favorable profile for goals at both ends. Brann average 1.75 goals, while HamKam concede as many as 1.88 goals per match and have kept a clean sheet in only 13% of their games. HamKam score an average of 1.25 goals, while Brann’s defense allows opponents an xG of 1.72 and concedes an average of 1.50 goals. In their last five matches, the hosts recorded BTTS in 80% of games and conceded 1.8 goals per match, although HamKam’s weaker BTTS trend at 40% reduces confidence in the pick. Nevertheless, the high scoring indicators and the visitors’ defensive inefficiency favor a scenario in which both sides find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The profile of this fixture clearly points to at least two goals: matches involving both teams have gone over the 1.5-goal line in 88% of cases. Brann score an average of 1.75 goals per match, while HamKam concede as many as 1.88, with the hosts having scored 12 goals in their last five appearances, or 2.4 per game. Both defences are currently vulnerable, as each team has conceded 9 goals in their last five matches, averaging 1.8 per game. The chance-creation potential also supports goals: Brann’s average xG over their last five matches stands at 1.69, while HamKam allow opponents 1.77 xG. Over 1.5 goals is the strongest selection, combining very high historical consistency with the hosts’ attacking form and the visitors’ defensive weakness.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Brann held the lead at the break in 50% of matches, while HamKam were trailing at half-time in as many as 63% of their games, clearly strengthening the scenario of a home lead. Before the break, Brann score an average of 0.75 goals and concede 0.63, whereas HamKam score just 0.25 goals and concede 1.13. Recent form also favours the hosts: in their last five matches, they led at half-time in 60% of cases, while the visitors were behind at the break in 80%. After the interval, Brann score an average of 1.0 goal, while HamKam concede 0.75, and the hosts’ superiority over the entire season is reflected in their 63% win rate compared with just 13% for their opponents. Therefore, the 1/1 outcome remains the most likely, although Brann’s average of 1.5 goals conceded per match leaves some risk of a late turnaround.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

70Possession (%)30
BrannHamKam
31Shots4
BrannHamKam
13Shots on target0
BrannHamKam
3.73xG0.48
BrannHamKam
10Corners1
BrannHamKam
123Dangerous attacks30
BrannHamKam
10Fouls12
BrannHamKam
1Cards3
BrannHamKam

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.06Goals scored / match1.5
BrannHamKam
1.69Goals conceded / match1.69
BrannHamKam
58%Average possession48%
BrannHamKam
4.81Shots on target / match4.38
BrannHamKam

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13Shots per match11.06
BrannHamKam
4.81Shots on target4.38
BrannHamKam
15.9%Shot conversion13.6%
BrannHamKam
58%Possession48%
BrannHamKam
1.6xG for1.33
BrannHamKam
1.58xG against1.69
BrannHamKam

Shooting quality

Brann: Efficient finishingHamKam: Efficient finishing
BrannHamKam
Accuracy (shots on target)37%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Brann is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Brann · 0.8 pts / match - HamKam

Brann
LWWLW
Season result split
44% W6% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-1-8
1.38 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-4
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
HamKam
LLLWD
Season result split
38% W25% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-6
1.38 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.77BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Brann is 37% better for: goals scored per match.

2.06 goals / match - Brann · 1.5 goals / match - HamKam

Brann scoring profile: very strong

Brann scores in 94% of matches (15 of 16 matches), while HamKam keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).

HamKam scoring profile: very strong

HamKam scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while Brann keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 16 matches).

33Goals scored (season)24
BrannHamKam
27Goals conceded (season)27
BrannHamKam
3.75Average goals in match3.19
BrannHamKam
10Goals scored (last 5)5
BrannHamKam
9Goals conceded (last 5)9
BrannHamKam

How often they score at least...

94%1 goal88%
BrannHamKam
63%2 goals44%
BrannHamKam
25%3 goals13%
BrannHamKam
13%4 goals6%
BrannHamKam

How often they concede at least...

94%1 goal75%
BrannHamKam
50%2 goals44%
BrannHamKam
25%3 goals25%
BrannHamKam
0%4 goals19%
BrannHamKam

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time13%
BrannHamKam
13%BTTS in both halves6%
BrannHamKam
38%Scored in both halves25%
BrannHamKam

BTTS and goal count

81%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
BrannHamKam
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
BrannHamKam
100%BTTS - last 540%
BrannHamKam

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

94%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
BrannHamKam
69%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
BrannHamKam
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
BrannHamKam

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
BrannHamKam
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
BrannHamKam
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
BrannHamKam

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Brann is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - Brann · 1.13 pts / match - HamKam

Brann - half-time state
38% leading25% draw38% trailing
HamKam - half-time state
31% leading19% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.13
BrannHamKam
1Goals scored (1st half)0.5
BrannHamKam
0.88Goals conceded (1st half)0.88
BrannHamKam
1.88Average goals (1st half)1.38
BrannHamKam
44%Clean sheet before half-time38%
BrannHamKam
31%No goal before half-time63%
BrannHamKam

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.69
BrannHamKam
1.06Goals scored (2nd half)1
BrannHamKam
0.81Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
BrannHamKam
1.88Average goals (2nd half)1.81
BrannHamKam
31%Clean sheet after half-time50%
BrannHamKam
38%No goal after half-time25%
BrannHamKam

Brann - second-half results

31% W44% D25% L
22
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

HamKam - second-half results

44% W38% D19% L
18
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Brann - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
HamKam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.40
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Brann
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
4
4
16-30
9
6
31-45
3
4
46-60
6
3
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

HamKam
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
4
16-30
5
7
31-45
5
8
46-60
3
2
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.47
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
76%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
83%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Brann

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

HamKam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).

Teams vs league

BrannLigaHamKam
Average goals in match▲ 3.753.05▲ 3.19
Both teams scored▲ 88%56%▲ 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 88%60%▲ 69%
Clean sheets▼ 6%23%▲ 25%
Goal before half-time▲ 94%85%▲ 88%
Goal after half-time▲ 81%79%▲ 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.05
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.76
Home goals / match
1.30
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. HamKamYellow cardBlerton Isufi
  2. HamKamRed cardMartin Gjone
  3. HamKamSubstitutionOn: Markus JohnsgårdOff: Blerton Isufi
  4. BrannYellow cardKristall Máni Ingason
  5. BrannSubstitutionOn: Bård FinneOff: Noah Jean Holm
  6. BrannGoalBård Finne

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Brann 4 - 1 - 0 HamKam. Average goals 3.20, both teams scored in 80% matches.

HamKam
1 : 5
Brann
SK Brann
3 : 1
Hamarkameratene Fotball
Hamarkameratene Fotball
1 : 1
SK Brann
HamKam
1 : 2
Brann
Brann
1 : 0
HamKam

FAQ

What was the result of Brann vs HamKam?

The Eliteserien match finished Brann 3:0 HamKam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Brann and HamKam?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Brann won 4, HamKam won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Brann vs HamKam?

Brann score 2.06 goals per game on average and HamKam 1.50. The Eliteserien average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 88% of Brann's matches and 63% of HamKam's.

What form are Brann and HamKam in?

Over the last 5 games Brann have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and HamKam 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Brann vs HamKam?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.