Slovenia - PrvaLigaStadion StožiceData current as of 06 September 2026

Bravo vs Nafta: match statistics

Bravo crest
Bravo
0 : 3half-time 0:1
Nafta crest
Nafta

Bravo vs Nafta: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Bravo played Nafta in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The match was played on 26 July 2026. Venue: Stadion Stožice. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

Bravo: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Nafta: 0-0-1, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Bravo scores 2.00 and concedes 0.00 goals per match. Nafta scores 0.00 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.00 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Bravo 0%, Nafta 0%. Over 2.5: Bravo 0%, Nafta 0%. League level: BTTS 14%, Over 2.5 29%.

xG, shots and style

Nafta has higher xG: 1.84 vs 1.70. Bravo: 17.0 shots per match, Nafta: 15.0.

Match halves

Bravo: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 1.00. Nafta: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

Bravo: 16-30 (1 goals). Nafta: 0-15 (0 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

PrvaLiga: 2.00 goals per match, BTTS 14%, Over 2.5 29%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Bravo is in exceptional form — winning 5 of their last 5 matches, scoring 12 goals (2.4 per game) and conceding 4 (0.8 per game), which yields 3 points per game over that period and places them 1st in the table. Nafta’s last 5 matches show 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 3 goals scored (0.6 per game) and 5 conceded (1.0 per game), translating to an average of 1 point per game. In season-long stats Bravo officially has 1 win and 2 goals scored in the league with 0 conceded, while Nafta has 0 wins and 0 goals scored plus 1 loss and 2 goals conceded, confirming the hosts’ stronger start. The offensive differential is significant — hosts average 2.4 goals in their last 5 matches versus the visitors’ 0.6; defensively Bravo also performs better (0.8 conceded per game vs 1.0 for Nafta). Based on this, I predict a Bravo victory; estimated probabilities: 68% Bravo win, 17% draw, 15% Nafta win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict a higher probability for the 'No' scenario (BTTS - No). League trend supports this: only 20% of league matches finish BTTS, and the league clean sheets rate is 100%. In the last 5 matches Bravo had BTTS in 60% of cases (3/5), while Nafta only in 40% (2/5); additionally Bravo averages 2.4 goals in those 5 matches (12 goals) with xG 2.08, and Nafta only 0.6 goals in 5 matches (3 goals) despite xG 1.69, indicating poor finishing from the away side. Bravo concedes 0.8 goals on average in the last 5, and Nafta 1.0, so both teams do allow goals, but Nafta’s low scoring output (0.6) lowers the BTTS probability. Considering season-long team indicators (seasonal BTTS 0% for both) and the goal asymmetry 2.4 vs 0.6, I assign 60% to 'No' and 40% to 'Yes' (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Bravo has scored 12 goals in the last 5 matches (2.4 per match) and posts an average xG of 2.08 per game; they also average 15 shots and 6 on target. Nafta scored 3 goals in those five fixtures (0.6 per match), but their xG over the last 5 is 1.69, indicating poor chance conversion (xG 1.69 vs 0.6 goals). The combined xG (2.08 + 1.69 = 3.77) suggests potential for a high-scoring game, while actual last-5 data shows a total average of 15 goals, i.e. 3.0 per match; therefore I project 2.05 expected goals for Bravo and 1.05 for Nafta, totaling 3.10. Additionally, Bravo’s seasonal metric shows seasonOver15Percentage_home = 100% and last5_over25Percentage_overall_home = 80% (4 of 5), which strongly supports breaking the 1.5 line and is materially in favor of over 2.5. On this basis the strongest signal from the data is over 1.5 (high probability), hence the recommendation: play over at the 1.5 line; estimated probabilities: over 1.5 ~90%, over 2.5 ~70%, over 3.5 ~35%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is 1/1 (Bravo leads at the break and wins the match): Bravo won all of their last 5 matches (100% wins) and led at half-time in 3 of those 5 matches (60%), with an average goals at the break of 1.2 versus 0.0 for Nafta. A strong alternative is 2/1 — in 2 of the 5 matches (40%) Bravo were trailing at half-time but completed a turnaround to win; additionally Bravo’s average second-half goals in the last 5 matches is 1.2. Nafta has only a 20% win rate in the last 5 matches and scored zero goals on average by half-time (0.0), which significantly reduces the probability of scenarios favoring the visitors. Moreover, Bravo generates an average of 1.84 xG per match and records 15 shots and 6 on target per match, confirming superiority in chance creation and increasing the likelihood of a goal before the break and of maintaining the lead until full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
BravoNafta
22Shots14
BravoNafta
6Shots on target8
BravoNafta
2.45xG1.81
BravoNafta
10Corners3
BravoNafta
88Dangerous attacks50
BravoNafta
13Fouls13
BravoNafta
3Cards3
BravoNafta

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match0
BravoNafta
0Goals conceded / match2
BravoNafta
35%Average possession39%
BravoNafta
5Shots on target / match6
BravoNafta

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

17Shots per match15
BravoNafta
5Shots on target6
BravoNafta
11.8%Shot conversion0%
BravoNafta
35%Possession39%
BravoNafta
1.7xG for1.84
BravoNafta
2.42xG against1.46
BravoNafta

Shooting quality

Bravo: AttackingNafta: Attacking
BravoNafta
Accuracy (shots on target)29%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Bravo
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 2.42BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Nafta
L
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% R100% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Bravo scoring profile: very strong

Bravo scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

Nafta scoring profile: more difficult

Nafta scores in 0% of matches (0 of 1 matches), while Bravo keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 matches).

2Goals scored (season)0
BravoNafta
0Goals conceded (season)2
BravoNafta
2Average goals in match2
BravoNafta
2Goals scored (last 5)0
BravoNafta
0Goals conceded (last 5)2
BravoNafta

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal0%
BravoNafta
100%2 goals0%
BravoNafta
0%3 goals0%
BravoNafta
0%4 goals0%
BravoNafta

How often they concede at least...

0%1 goal100%
BravoNafta
0%2 goals100%
BravoNafta
0%3 goals0%
BravoNafta
0%4 goals0%
BravoNafta

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
BravoNafta
0%BTTS in both halves0%
BravoNafta
100%Scored in both halves0%
BravoNafta

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
BravoNafta
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
BravoNafta
0%BTTS - last 50%
BravoNafta

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
BravoNafta
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
BravoNafta
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
BravoNafta

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
BravoNafta
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
BravoNafta
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
BravoNafta

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Bravo - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing
Nafta - half-time state
0% leading0% draw100% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

3Points per match (1st half)0
BravoNafta
1Goals scored (1st half)0
BravoNafta
0Goals conceded (1st half)1
BravoNafta
1Average goals (1st half)1
BravoNafta
100%Clean sheet before half-time0%
BravoNafta
0%No goal before half-time100%
BravoNafta

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per match (2nd half)0
BravoNafta
1Goals scored (2nd half)0
BravoNafta
0Goals conceded (2nd half)1
BravoNafta
1Average goals (2nd half)1
BravoNafta
100%Clean sheet after half-time0%
BravoNafta
0%No goal after half-time100%
BravoNafta

Bravo - second-half results

100% W0% R0% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nafta - second-half results

0% W0% R100% P
0
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Bravo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.003.00
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Nafta - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.000.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Bravo
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Nafta
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 0.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
0%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
0%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Bravo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.72
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+2.72
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+2.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
233%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Nafta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-2.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.84
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
0%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
233%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).

Teams vs league

BravoLigaNafta
Average goals in match 2.002.00 2.00
Both teams scored 0%14% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%29% 0%
Clean sheets 100%50% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%86% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%71% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.00
Average goals per match
14%
Both teams scored
29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
50%
Clean sheets
0.86
Home goals / match
1.14
Away goals / match
+-25%
Home attack advantage
+-33%
Home defence advantage
+-14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
0%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. NaftaGoalLuka PihlerAssist: Luka Kambič
  2. NaftaYellow cardAnis Jašaragič
  3. NaftaYellow cardJosip Ivan Zorica
  4. BravoYellow cardMarwann Nzuzi
  5. NaftaSubstitutionOn: Aleks PihlerOff: Michael Ogwuche
  6. NaftaSubstitutionOn: Shyon OmraniOff: Luka Pihler
  7. BravoRed cardArinze James Inyere
  8. BravoSubstitutionOn: Andrej PecarOff: Divine Omoregie
  9. NaftaYellow cardShyon Omrani

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Bravo vs Nafta?

The PrvaLiga match finished Bravo 0:3 Nafta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Bravo vs Nafta?

Bravo score 2.00 goals per game on average and Nafta 0.00. The PrvaLiga average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 29% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Bravo's matches and 0% of Nafta's.

What form are Bravo and Nafta in?

Over the last 5 games Bravo have a 1-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Nafta 0-0-1 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bravo vs Nafta?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.