England - Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Brighton & Hove Albion vs Nottingham Forest: match statistics

155%(2.17)
X27%(3.74)
218%(3.48)

Brighton & Hove Albion hold a clear advantage as the home side, boasting a 38% win rate in home matches with just a 15% loss rate. Their offensive efficiency at home (averaging 1.54 goals per game) and their xG advantage (1.6 vs 1.26) indicate solid goal-scoring form. Nottingham Forest records poor away results with a 54% loss rate and only a 31% win rate, scoring on average just 0.92 goals per away game. The goal difference is significant: Brighton are +6 at home, while Forest are -8 away. Possession (54% vs 47%) and a higher number of shots on target (4.62 vs 3.92) further support the hosts. The poor form of both teams in their last five matches (0.8 points per game each) could lead to a more cautious approach, hence a significant probability of a draw, but Brighton should be able to capitalize on their home advantage.

Brighton & Hove Albion vs Nottingham Forest: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Brighton & Hove Albion play Nottingham Forest in Premier League (England). The match date is 1 March 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Brighton & Hove Albion: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Nottingham Forest: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Brighton & Hove Albion scores 1.37 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. Nottingham Forest scores 1.26 and concedes 1.34. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Brighton & Hove Albion 55%, Nottingham Forest 47%. Over 2.5: Brighton & Hove Albion 50%, Nottingham Forest 53%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Brighton & Hove Albion has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.44. Brighton & Hove Albion: 13.0 shots per match, Nottingham Forest: 12.5.

Match halves

Brighton & Hove Albion: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.84. Nottingham Forest: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.76.

Goals by minute

Brighton & Hove Albion: 76-90+ (16 goals). Nottingham Forest: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premier League: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Brighton & Hove Albion hold a clear advantage as the home side, boasting a 38% win rate in home matches with just a 15% loss rate. Their offensive efficiency at home (averaging 1.54 goals per game) and their xG advantage (1.6 vs 1.26) indicate solid goal-scoring form. Nottingham Forest records poor away results with a 54% loss rate and only a 31% win rate, scoring on average just 0.92 goals per away game. The goal difference is significant: Brighton are +6 at home, while Forest are -8 away. Possession (54% vs 47%) and a higher number of shots on target (4.62 vs 3.92) further support the hosts. The poor form of both teams in their last five matches (0.8 points per game each) could lead to a more cautious approach, hence a significant probability of a draw, but Brighton should be able to capitalize on their home advantage.

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
14Shots13
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
7Shots on target4
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
1.65xG1.39
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
4Corners4
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
38Dangerous attacks40
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
12Fouls13
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
3Cards1
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
1.37Goals scored / match1.26
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
1.21Goals conceded / match1.34
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
54%Average possession47%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
4.63Shots on target / match4.11
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.03Shots per match12.53
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
4.63Shots on target4.11
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
10.5%Shot conversion10.1%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
54%Possession47%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
1.54xG for1.44
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
1.33xG against1.52
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest

Shooting quality

Brighton & Hove Albion: BalancedNottingham Forest: Balanced
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
Accuracy (shots on target)36%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nottingham Forest is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Brighton & Hove Albion · 1.6 pts / match - Nottingham Forest

Brighton & Hove Albion
WLWLL
Season result split
37% W29% R34% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-11-13
1.39 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-6-4
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.80Opponent xG: 0.96BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 80%
Nottingham Forest
WWDLD
Season result split
29% W29% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-11-16
1.16 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-9
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 2.10BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Brighton & Hove Albion is 9% better for: goals scored per match.

1.37 goals / match - Brighton & Hove Albion · 1.26 goals / match - Nottingham Forest

Brighton & Hove Albion is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.21 goals / match - Brighton & Hove Albion · 1.34 goals / match - Nottingham Forest

Brighton & Hove Albion scoring profile: very strong

Brighton & Hove Albion scores in 76% of matches (29 of 38 matches), while Nottingham Forest keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 38 matches).

Nottingham Forest scoring profile: strong

Nottingham Forest scores in 63% of matches (24 of 38 matches), while Brighton & Hove Albion keeps a clean sheet in 26% (10 of 38 matches).

52Goals scored (season)48
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
46Goals conceded (season)51
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
2.58Average goals in match2.61
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
7Goals scored (last 5)12
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal63%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
47%2 goals34%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
13%3 goals21%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
0%4 goals5%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal76%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
32%2 goals39%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
11%3 goals18%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
5%4 goals0%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
Brighton & Hove Albion - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.21 of 38 matches
47%
Nottingham Forest - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.18 of 38 matches
56%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time13%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
5%BTTS in both halves0%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
29%Scored in both halves18%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS21%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
20%BTTS - last 580%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Brighton & Hove Albion is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.18 pts / match - Brighton & Hove Albion · 1 pts / match - Nottingham Forest

Brighton & Hove Albion - half-time state
29% leading32% draw39% trailing
Nottingham Forest - half-time state
21% leading37% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.18Points per match (1st half)1
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
0.66Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
1.18Average goals (1st half)1.13
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
47%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
61%No goal before half-time66%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest

After half-time (2nd half)

1.55Points per match (2nd half)1.32
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
0.84Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
1.39Average goals (2nd half)1.47
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
53%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest
34%No goal after half-time53%
Brighton & Hove AlbionNottingham Forest

Brighton & Hove Albion - second-half results

39% W37% R24% P
45
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
59
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding128%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nottingham Forest - second-half results

32% W37% R32% P
38
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Brighton & Hove Albion - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Nottingham Forest - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.20
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+60
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Brighton & Hove Albion
ScoredConceded
9
6
0-15
4
8
16-30
7
11
31-45
7
5
46-60
9
5
61-75
16
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Nottingham Forest
ScoredConceded
8
6
0-15
2
6
16-30
9
12
31-45
10
9
46-60
6
3
61-75
13
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.59
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
51%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Brighton & Hove Albion

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Nottingham Forest

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier League).

Teams vs league

Brighton & Hove AlbionLigaNottingham Forest
Average goals in match 2.582.75 2.61
Both teams scored 55%56% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%55% 53%
Clean sheets 26%26% 24%
Goal before half-time 76%72% 74%
Goal after half-time 87%79% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Brighton & Hove Albion 1 - 0 - 0 Nottingham Forest. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Brighton & Hove Albion vs Nottingham Forest?

The Premier League match finished Brighton & Hove Albion 2:1 Nottingham Forest. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Brighton & Hove Albion vs Nottingham Forest?

Brighton & Hove Albion score 1.37 goals per game on average and Nottingham Forest 1.26. The Premier League average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Brighton & Hove Albion's matches and 47% of Nottingham Forest's.

What form are Brighton & Hove Albion and Nottingham Forest in?

Over the last 5 games Brighton & Hove Albion have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Nottingham Forest 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Brighton & Hove Albion vs Nottingham Forest?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.