Australia - A-LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Brisbane Roar vs Auckland: match statistics

Brisbane Roar crest
Brisbane Roar
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Auckland crest
Auckland
130%(3.20)
X25%(3.45)
245%(2.15)

Auckland FC displays significantly better form and league standing, leading the competition with 6 victories in 11 matches. The visitors demonstrate impressive offensive efficiency with 16 goals scored this season and an average of 1.4 goals per away match, failing to score in only 20% of their games. Brisbane Roar is in poorer form, securing just 4 points in their last 5 fixtures with a goal difference of 3:7. Auckland remains unbeaten on the road this season (60% wins, 40% draws), providing a statistical and psychological edge. Superior xG (1.48 vs 1.34) and possession (51% vs 46%) metrics further favor the visitors. Considering all factors, Auckland has a strong chance of securing all three points, although Brisbane's solid home defense (80% clean sheets) could pose challenges, meaning a draw cannot be entirely ruled out.

Brisbane Roar vs Auckland: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Brisbane Roar play Auckland in A-League (Australia). The match date is 9 January 2026 at 09:35. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Brisbane Roar: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Auckland: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Brisbane Roar scores 1.04 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Auckland scores 1.60 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.82 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Brisbane Roar 58%, Auckland 67%. Over 2.5: Brisbane Roar 54%, Auckland 57%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Auckland has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.45. Brisbane Roar: 13.5 shots per match, Auckland: 15.6.

Match halves

Brisbane Roar: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.50. Auckland: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Brisbane Roar: 31-45+ (7 goals). Auckland: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

A-League: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Auckland FC displays significantly better form and league standing, leading the competition with 6 victories in 11 matches. The visitors demonstrate impressive offensive efficiency with 16 goals scored this season and an average of 1.4 goals per away match, failing to score in only 20% of their games. Brisbane Roar is in poorer form, securing just 4 points in their last 5 fixtures with a goal difference of 3:7. Auckland remains unbeaten on the road this season (60% wins, 40% draws), providing a statistical and psychological edge. Superior xG (1.48 vs 1.34) and possession (51% vs 46%) metrics further favor the visitors. Considering all factors, Auckland has a strong chance of securing all three points, although Brisbane's solid home defense (80% clean sheets) could pose challenges, meaning a draw cannot be entirely ruled out.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
Brisbane RoarAuckland
13Shots14
Brisbane RoarAuckland
3Shots on target6
Brisbane RoarAuckland
1.34xG1.64
Brisbane RoarAuckland
3Corners5
Brisbane RoarAuckland
41Dangerous attacks47
Brisbane RoarAuckland
11Fouls14
Brisbane RoarAuckland
4Cards2
Brisbane RoarAuckland

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Brisbane RoarAuckland
1.04Goals scored / match1.6
Brisbane RoarAuckland
1.38Goals conceded / match1.03
Brisbane RoarAuckland
47%Average possession50%
Brisbane RoarAuckland
4.15Shots on target / match5.13
Brisbane RoarAuckland

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.5Shots per match15.63
Brisbane RoarAuckland
4.15Shots on target5.13
Brisbane RoarAuckland
7.7%Shot conversion10.2%
Brisbane RoarAuckland
47%Possession50%
Brisbane RoarAuckland
1.45xG for1.7
Brisbane RoarAuckland
1.27xG against1.3
Brisbane RoarAuckland

Shooting quality

Brisbane Roar: BalancedAuckland: Attacking
Brisbane RoarAuckland
Accuracy (shots on target)31%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Auckland is 350% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Brisbane Roar · 1.8 pts / match - Auckland

Brisbane Roar
LDDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
23% W31% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-8-12
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-6
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
DDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.04BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Auckland
DDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
43% W37% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-11-6
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-5-2
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auckland is 54% better for: goals scored per match.

1.04 goals / match - Brisbane Roar · 1.6 goals / match - Auckland

Auckland is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.38 goals / match - Brisbane Roar · 1.03 goals / match - Auckland

Brisbane Roar scoring profile: strong

Brisbane Roar scores in 73% of matches (19 of 26 matches), while Auckland keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 matches).

Auckland scoring profile: very strong

Auckland scores in 93% of matches (28 of 30 matches), while Brisbane Roar keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 matches).

27Goals scored (season)48
Brisbane RoarAuckland
36Goals conceded (season)31
Brisbane RoarAuckland
2.42Average goals in match2.63
Brisbane RoarAuckland
6Goals scored (last 5)8
Brisbane RoarAuckland
9Goals conceded (last 5)4
Brisbane RoarAuckland

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal93%
Brisbane RoarAuckland
27%2 goals47%
Brisbane RoarAuckland
4%3 goals13%
Brisbane RoarAuckland
0%4 goals3%
Brisbane RoarAuckland

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal70%
Brisbane RoarAuckland
46%2 goals30%
Brisbane RoarAuckland
15%3 goals3%
Brisbane RoarAuckland
4%4 goals0%
Brisbane RoarAuckland

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time33%
Brisbane RoarAuckland
0%BTTS in both halves10%
Brisbane RoarAuckland
27%Scored in both halves37%
Brisbane RoarAuckland

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Brisbane RoarAuckland
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Brisbane RoarAuckland
80%BTTS - last 560%
Brisbane RoarAuckland

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Brisbane RoarAuckland
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Brisbane RoarAuckland
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Brisbane RoarAuckland

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
Brisbane RoarAuckland
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
Brisbane RoarAuckland
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
Brisbane RoarAuckland

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auckland is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.27 pts / match - Brisbane Roar · 1.7 pts / match - Auckland

Brisbane Roar - half-time state
27% leading46% draw27% trailing
Auckland - half-time state
43% leading40% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per match (1st half)1.7
Brisbane RoarAuckland
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.87
Brisbane RoarAuckland
0.54Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Brisbane RoarAuckland
1.08Average goals (1st half)1.4
Brisbane RoarAuckland
50%Clean sheet before half-time57%
Brisbane RoarAuckland
46%No goal before half-time27%
Brisbane RoarAuckland

After half-time (2nd half)

1.04Points per match (2nd half)1.6
Brisbane RoarAuckland
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
Brisbane RoarAuckland
0.85Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Brisbane RoarAuckland
1.35Average goals (2nd half)1.23
Brisbane RoarAuckland
54%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Brisbane RoarAuckland
54%No goal after half-time43%
Brisbane RoarAuckland

Brisbane Roar - second-half results

23% W35% R42% P
33
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 23%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Auckland - second-half results

40% W40% R20% P
51
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Brisbane Roar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Auckland - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Brisbane Roar
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
3
5
16-30
7
4
31-45
3
6
46-60
3
7
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Auckland
ScoredConceded
8
4
0-15
8
5
16-30
10
7
31-45
8
4
46-60
7
4
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.53
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
68%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Brisbane Roar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Auckland

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A-League).

Teams vs league

Brisbane RoarLigaAuckland
Average goals in match 2.422.82 2.63
Both teams scored 58%60% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 54%56% 57%
Clean sheets 27%23% 30%
Goal before half-time 77%72% 83%
Goal after half-time 69%82% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.82
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.49
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Brisbane Roar 0 - 1 - 0 Auckland. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Brisbane Roar vs Auckland?

The A-League match finished Brisbane Roar 0:2 Auckland. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Brisbane Roar vs Auckland?

Brisbane Roar score 1.04 goals per game on average and Auckland 1.60. The A-League average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Brisbane Roar's matches and 67% of Auckland's.

What form are Brisbane Roar and Auckland in?

Over the last 5 games Brisbane Roar have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Auckland 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Brisbane Roar vs Auckland?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.