Brisbane Roar vs Melbourne Victory FC: match statistics
Brisbane Roar vs Melbourne Victory FC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Brisbane Roar played Melbourne Victory FC in A-League (Australia). The match was played on 28 November 2025. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Brisbane Roar: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Melbourne Victory FC: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Brisbane Roar scores 1.20 and concedes 0.60 goals per match. Melbourne Victory FC scores 0.80 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.70 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Brisbane Roar 40%, Melbourne Victory FC 20%. Over 2.5: Brisbane Roar 40%, Melbourne Victory FC 40%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Melbourne Victory FC has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.13. Brisbane Roar: 10.6 shots per match, Melbourne Victory FC: 15.6.
Match halves
Brisbane Roar: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 0.40. Melbourne Victory FC: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40.
Goals by minute
Brisbane Roar: 31-45+ (4 goals). Melbourne Victory FC: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
A-League: 2.70 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Brisbane Roar | Melbourne Victory FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 25% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.17 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Brisbane Roar is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Brisbane Roar · 0.8 pts / match - Melbourne Victory FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Brisbane Roar is 50% better for: goals scored per match.
1.2 goals / match - Brisbane Roar · 0.8 goals / match - Melbourne Victory FC
Brisbane Roar is 233% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.6 goals / match - Brisbane Roar · 2 goals / match - Melbourne Victory FC
Brisbane Roar scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Melbourne Victory FC keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).
Melbourne Victory FC scores in 40% of matches (2 of 5 matches), while Brisbane Roar keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Brisbane Roar
Over / Under - Melbourne Victory FC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Brisbane Roar is 120% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.2 pts / match - Brisbane Roar · 1 pts / match - Melbourne Victory FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Brisbane Roar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 40%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Melbourne Victory FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Brisbane Roar
Melbourne Victory FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A-League).
Teams vs league
| Brisbane Roar | Liga | Melbourne Victory FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.80 | 2.70 | • 2.80 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 53% | ▼ 20% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 50% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 60% | 27% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 70% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 40% | 73% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Brisbane Roar vs Melbourne Victory FC?
The A-League match finished Brisbane Roar 1:0 Melbourne Victory FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Brisbane Roar vs Melbourne Victory FC?
Brisbane Roar score 1.20 goals per game on average and Melbourne Victory FC 0.80. The A-League average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Brisbane Roar's matches and 20% of Melbourne Victory FC's.
What form are Brisbane Roar and Melbourne Victory FC in?
Over the last 5 games Brisbane Roar have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Melbourne Victory FC 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Brisbane Roar vs Melbourne Victory FC?
The statistical background for Brisbane Roar vs Melbourne Victory FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.