Bristol Rovers vs Cheltenham Town: match statistics
Bristol Rovers vs Cheltenham Town: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Bristol Rovers played Cheltenham Town in EFL League Two (England). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 4:0.
Current form
Bristol Rovers: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Cheltenham Town: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Bristol Rovers scores 1.16 and concedes 1.45 goals per match. Cheltenham Town scores 1.18 and concedes 1.61. League average: 2.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Bristol Rovers 45%, Cheltenham Town 52%. Over 2.5: Bristol Rovers 52%, Cheltenham Town 45%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Bristol Rovers has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.16. Bristol Rovers: 11.6 shots per match, Cheltenham Town: 10.1.
Match halves
Bristol Rovers: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.68. Cheltenham Town: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.84.
Goals by minute
Bristol Rovers: 61-75 (12 goals). Cheltenham Town: 61-75 (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League Two: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Bristol Rovers are in significantly better form — they’ve won 5 of their last 5 matches, scoring 11 and conceding 4 (avg 2.2 scored and 0.8 conceded per match), while Cheltenham over their last 5 are 3-1-1 with 9 goals and 5 conceded (1.8/1.0). At home Bristol average 1.23 goals and 1.27 conceded with xG 1.32 and xG against 1.31; they also record more possession (51% vs 46%), more shots (11.95 vs 9.77) and a higher clean sheet rate (32% vs 23%). The hosts’ key advantage is home defence: Cheltenham concede 1.91 goals on the road versus 1.27 at home, and the higher xG against for the visitors (1.71 vs 1.31) suggests they will be exposed to chance creation. The visitors are, however, efficient in finishing — higher conversion (12% vs 10%) and slightly more shots on target per match (3.14 vs 2.95), meaning they can threaten if they create a few chances. Considering Bristol’s form, steadier home defence and Cheltenham’s away GD -17 versus hosts’ -1, I favour a home win and estimate probabilities: home 60%, draw 22%, away 18%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have seasonal BTTS rates: Bristol Rovers 50% and Cheltenham 55%, with the league average BTTS at 53%, providing a baseline around 52-53%. In the last 5 matches both sides have a 60% BTTS rate; Bristol scored 11 goals in those 5 fixtures (2.2 avg) and Cheltenham 9 goals (1.8 avg). Defensively both teams are vulnerable: season goals conceded are 64 (1.32 per match) for Bristol and 71 (1.91 per match) for Cheltenham, and expected xG against of 1.59 and 1.71 respectively, increasing the likelihood of conceding. Additionally, average shots on target of 2.86 (Bristol) and 3.14 (Cheltenham) with a 12% conversion rate suggest chances are translating into goals, and clean sheets are relatively rare (27% and 23%). On this basis I tip BTTS = Yes with a probability of 65% vs 35%, because recent form (60% BTTS) combined with high xG against and low clean sheet percentages outweigh the moderate seasonal levels of 50-55%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and seasonal averages: Bristol has xG 1.19 and scores 1.23 goals at home on average, while Cheltenham concedes xG 1.71 and concedes 1.91 goals away — together this yields about 1.45 expected goals for Bristol. Conversely, Cheltenham has xG 1.13 and Bristol concedes xG 1.59, giving about 1.36 expected goals for the visitors; averaging both approaches the final estimate is 1.51 (Bristol) and 1.29 (Cheltenham), total 2.80. A Poisson model with combined lambda=2.80 indicates ~77% probability of Over 1.5 goals, ~53% for Over 2.5 and ~31% for Over 3.5, which aligns with seasonal over1.5 rates (Bristol 77%, Cheltenham 82%) and over2.5 (both 45%). Additionally, in the last 5 matches Bristol averaged 2.2 goals, Cheltenham 1.8, and both teams have 60% over2.5 in their last five fixtures, reinforcing the higher-goal signal. Therefore the strongest and best-justified pick is Over 1.5 (side: Over).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a Bristol Rovers win (X/1) — I assign this 24%. Both teams record draws at half-time very frequently: the home side in 50% of matches, the visitors in 55% (average approximately 52.5%), so a draw at the break is the dominant state. Nevertheless Bristol Rovers have a clear advantage over the full match and after the break: the home team averages 1.41 points per match this season versus Cheltenham’s 0.95, they have won 5 of their last 5 matches (100% in the last 5) and earn 1.55 points per match in the second half compared to 1.09 for the visitors, which increases their chance of a post-break victory. Additionally the home side score on average 0.95 goals in the second half versus 0.73 for Cheltenham and in the last 5 matches they led at half-time in 40% of cases compared to 20% for the visitors, therefore the X/1 scenario is strongest compared with alternatives such as X/X (18%) or 1/1 (19%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Bristol Rovers | Cheltenham Town | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Bristol Rovers is 50% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / match - Bristol Rovers · 2 pts / match - Cheltenham Town
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Bristol Rovers is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.45 goals / match - Bristol Rovers · 1.61 goals / match - Cheltenham Town
Bristol Rovers scores in 66% of matches (29 of 44 matches), while Cheltenham Town keeps a clean sheet in 25% (11 of 44 matches).
Cheltenham Town scores in 75% of matches (33 of 44 matches), while Bristol Rovers keeps a clean sheet in 23% (10 of 44 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bristol Rovers
Over / Under - Cheltenham Town
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Bristol Rovers is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.18 pts / match - Bristol Rovers · 0.86 pts / match - Cheltenham Town
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bristol Rovers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Cheltenham Town - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (21). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (16 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Bristol Rovers
Cheltenham Town
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Bristol Rovers | Liga | Cheltenham Town | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.61 | 2.56 | ▲ 2.80 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 52% | • 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 52% | 48% | ▼ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 27% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 66% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 78% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Bristol Rovers 0 - 0 - 1 Cheltenham Town. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Bristol Rovers vs Cheltenham Town?
The EFL League Two match finished Bristol Rovers 4:0 Cheltenham Town. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Bristol Rovers vs Cheltenham Town?
Bristol Rovers score 1.16 goals per game on average and Cheltenham Town 1.18. The EFL League Two average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Bristol Rovers's matches and 52% of Cheltenham Town's.
What form are Bristol Rovers and Cheltenham Town in?
Over the last 5 games Bristol Rovers have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Cheltenham Town 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bristol Rovers vs Cheltenham Town?
The statistical background for Bristol Rovers vs Cheltenham Town — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


